1980
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1980)037<1342:sadpom>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smoke and Dust Particles of Meteoric Origin in the Mesosphere and Stratosphere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

33
536
1
5

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 569 publications
(575 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
33
536
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, we have tried to assess the interpretation of our retrieved radii assuming that the actual MSP size distribution is of the same form as described by Hunten et al [1980]. Their results can be closely described by a distribution of the form…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, we have tried to assess the interpretation of our retrieved radii assuming that the actual MSP size distribution is of the same form as described by Hunten et al [1980]. Their results can be closely described by a distribution of the form…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radii show a near constant value of $0.8 nm, while number densities show a relatively steep gradient with only $10 cm À3 at an altitude of 85 km and maximum values of $1000 cm À3 at an altitude of 90 km. Importantly, these retrieved values are all well within the range of values suggested by MSP models and the available data from in situ observations [Hunten et al, 1980;Rapp et al, 2007].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reason for the comparatively high value of the impact angles found in the experiments, compared to those required for mesospheric dust particles, is most likely that the pure ice particles in the experiments will totally sublimate at lower impact angles (Tomsic, 2001). On the other hand, mesospheric ice particles may contain many small meteoric particles (Rosinski and Snow, 1961;Hunten et al, 1980;Megner et al, 2006) which probably do not sublimate. Havnes and Naesheim (2007) suggested that mesospheric dust particles fragment during impact and that much or all of the ice within which the meteoric smoke particles are embedded, sublimates, while the meteoric smoke particles carry away charge from the surface where the impact takes place.…”
Section: Secondary Charge Production In the Nlc/pmse And Pmse Layermentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The required effectivity for the secondary charge production of the mesospheric dust is much larger than what is observed for pure water-ice particles in experiments. This, combined with a modelling of the impacts on the dust probe grids as a function of payload spin rotation angle, led Havnes and Naesheim (2007) to conclude that a model for the mesospheric dust could be a fairly loosely bound ice particle in which a considerable number of small meteoric particles (Rosinski and Snow, 1961;Hunten et al, 1980;Megner et al, 2006) of radius 1 nm are embedded. Upon impact, the large dust particle was assumed to fragment into many small subparticles each containing one or more meteoric smoke particle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%