The feasibility of using hydrogen as a fuel will be determined by the availability and cost of hydrogen.This chapter considers techniques and costs of producing gaseous hydrogen along with costs of producing liquid, slush and solid hydrogen. It also examines the potential by-products that could lower the overall cost of using hydrogen.Fossil fuels and water are the two sources of hydrogen. Today most industrial hydrogen is derived from hydrocarbons (mainly natural gas) and costs 10 to 15c/kg to produce. When natural gas costs more than approximately 80c/MBTU, coal becomes a competitive source Vith production costs of 20 to 25c/kg. MBTU = BTU x 10 throughout this chapter.As the fossil fuels are depleted, water will become the principal source of hydrogen.The two most promising means of producing hydrogen from water are electrolysis and thermochemical decomposition. Although electrolysis is an existing technology, it is not cost competitive with other existing processes unless electrical power costs less than 5 mills/ kW-h-exceptions occur in those cases where ultra-high purity and/or small quantities of hydrogen are required. Thermochemical decomposition uses a combination of heat and chemicals to decompose water; the process requires several intermediate steps involving chemical reactions and separations.1.3 COST TO MAKE LIQUID, SLUSH, AND SOLID HYDROGEN FROM GASEOUS HYDROGEN Producing liquid, slush, and solid hydrogen from gaseous hydrogen requires capital investment, energy expense, and operating expense for the liquefier and/or refrigerator.An estimate of these costs can be obtained using information from a survey and correlation of current refrigerator/liquef ier capital costs and energy requirements by Strobridge [15].Liquefaction costs presented herein include the cost of gas purification; however, we are unable to supply a breakdown of purifying costs, as these are proprietary industrial data.
Liquid hydrogen is a potential synthetic fuel. It is nonfossil, its production and storage technology is well developed, and it is inherently nonpolluting. However, the economics of liquefying hydrogen are costly both in the energy required to produce the liquid and in the capital costs of the liquefier. These costs could be reduced by increasing the liquefier efficiency and/or by recovering a portion of the liquefaction energy at the use site. This paper provides the maximum hydrogen liquefier efficiency based on the efficiency of available components and the fraction of original liquefaction energy that can be recovered at the use site. Since the inefficient compressors and expanders are the major cause of liquefier inefficiency, no increase in liquefier efficiency above the current 30 to 35 percent is probable without a corresponding increase in compressor and expander efficiency-a difficult task since both the compressors and expanders have a long and stable history of development. However, roughly one-third to one-half of the actual energy required to liquefy hydrogen can be recovered at the use site and this represents a cost credit for liquid hydrogen.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.