No abstract

BACKGROUND An attenuated or absent nocturnal decline in blood pressure has repeatedly been documented in cardiac transplant recipients. The present study was aimed at investigating the hemodynamic mechanism underlying this abnormality. METHODS AND RESULTS In 23 cardiac transplant recipients (11 to 36 months after transplantation) and in 23 control subjects matched for age and 24-hour mean arterial pressure, invasive 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure was measured by means of the Oxford technique. Beat-to-beat relative values of stroke volume were determined by means of a pulse-contour method, and relative changes of cardiac output (stroke volume x heart rate) and total peripheral vascular resistance (blood pressure/cardiac output) over the 24-hour period were calculated. The nocturnal decline in blood pressure was 20 +/- 8% (mean +/- SD) in control subjects but only 5 +/- 9% (P < .001) in cardiac transplant recipients. In control subjects, the nocturnal decline in blood pressure was associated with a nocturnal fall in cardiac output of 24 +/- 13%, whereas vascular resistance compared with daytime value did not change. The small nocturnal decline in blood pressure in cardiac transplant recipients was associated with an attenuated nocturnal fall in cardiac output of 14 +/- 12% (P < .05 versus control subjects). In addition, vascular resistance compared with daytime value was increased by 9 +/- 9% (P < .05) during the night. Both in cardiac transplant recipients and in control subjects, the nocturnal changes in blood pressure were correlated with the nocturnal changes in cardiac output but not with the nocturnal changes in total peripheral vascular resistance. CONCLUSIONS This study confirms the attenuated nocturnal fall in blood pressure in cardiac transplant recipients. Hemodynamically, this attenuated blood pressure decline is characterized by a reduced nocturnal fall in cardiac output, and it is associated with a nocturnal increase in vascular resistance.

For the characterization of diurnal blood pressure variation, we developed a simple mathematical model that nevertheless does justice to the specific form characteristics of individual blood pressure registrations. Analysis was based on 24-hour continuous intra-arterial measurement of blood pressure obtained in 23 hospitalized patients with mild-to-moderate untreated essential hypertension (mean±SD, 112 ±13 mm Hg). The day-night difference for mean arterial pressure varied markedly (mean, 18.6 mm Hg; range, 6.8-36.0). Inspection of profiles suggested a model of blood pressure as two contiguous, complementary periods of constant pressure, a so-called square wave. Determination of the times of transience between both periods (segmentation) was performed individually using a least-square error criterion. Results were compared with those obtained by conventional methods, including analysis by Fourier modeling. The square wave fit accounted for a larger fraction (66%) of circadian variance of mean arterial pressure than modeling based on segmentation by visual inspection (59%, considerable observer bias) or by clock time (50%). Application of the Minnesota Cosinor Method resulted in the poorest description (47%). Segmentation based on harmonic modeling (61%) appeared to be cumbersome (10 harmonics needed), and the significance of additional information offered over the square wave fit is dubious. Observer bias makes segmentation by visual inspection unsuitable for assessment of the circadian variance of blood pressure. Even when daily activities are strictly regulated (hospital environment), circadian variance is not well modeled by clock time. As compared with harmonic analysis, square wave fitting is simple, and it appears to best model the circadian variance. The method can also be applied to data obtained from noninvasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Nevertheless, a constant and prominent feature in normotensive men is a fall of blood pressure during the night, which constitutes a major fraction of the total diurnal blood pressure variation.3 The question as to whether there is an internal biological "blood pressure clock" analogous to the one responsible for the circadian variation of certain hormone levels and body temperature is still open. Various pathologies have been shown to alter circadian blood pressure fluctuations. For instance, a paradoxical rise in blood pressure at

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract