Introduction. Functional dyspepsia (FD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) overlap is an adverse clinical situation, as patients with this syndrome have more severe clinical manifestations resulting in significant reductions in quality of life. For now, there are no meta-analytical papers that would summarize the frequency of FD – IBS overlap using the revised Rome IV criteria. Objective. To organize data on the prevalence of FD – IBS overlap using the revised Rome IV criteria.Materials and methods. A search for studies was conducted in MEDLINE / PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane electronic databases. The search depth was 6 years (from January 2016 to February 2021). The final analysis included original publications from peerreviewed periodicals that used the revised Rome IV criteria as a method for diagnosing FD and IBS in the adult population with detailed descriptive statistics allowing to include resulting data in the meta-analysis.Results and discussion. The final analysis included 6 studies involving 1,180 patients with PD and 600 patients with IBS. The generalized prevalence of IBS in patients with PD was 41.511% (95% CI: 22.203–62.288). The analysis was undertaken by using a random-effects model, as there was significant heterogeneity among results (p < 0.0001; I2 = 94.28%). The generalized prevalence of PD in patients with IBS was 38.791% (95% CI: 9.438–73.710). The analysis was undertaken by using a random-effects model, as there was significant heterogeneity among results (p < 0.0001; I2 = 99.25%).Сonclusion. The complete meta-analysis showed that the frequency of FD - IBS overlap using the revised Rome IV criteria is quite high and accounts for about 40%. At the same time, further large studies of more homogeneous structure are needed to verify these results and study the potential pathogenetic relationship between PD and IBS.
Steatohepatitises is an etiologically heterogeneous group of pathological changes in the liver, which are characterized by the inflammatory infiltration of the hepatic parenchyma with underlying fatty degeneration of hepatocytes. Whatever is the etiological cause, the clinical significance of steatohepatitis involves the formation of liver fibrosis and, as a result, an increased risk of developing liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, which are life-threatening conditions. It is common practice to identify the following etiological variants of steatohepatitis: metabolic (55–65% of cases), alcoholic (45–55% of cases) and drug-induced (approximately 5% of cases). The pathogenetic basis of metabolic steatohepatitis lies in the mechanisms of increased lipolysis, excess free fatty acid pool and reduced β-oxidation stemming from obesity and insulin resistance. Pathogenetic factors mediating the development of alcoholic steatohepatitis are the toxic activity of acetaldehyde and increased CYP2E1 activity. Intake of some hepatotoxic drugs increases lipogenesis in hepatocytes and disrupts the electron transport chain, which leads to the formation of liver steatosis followed by transformation into steatohepatitis. Whatever is the etiological varient, steatohepatitis is asymptomatic in the prevailing majority of cases. However, some patients may present complaints of weakness, discomfort, or indolent pain in the right hypochondrium. A detailed history taking is essential for the establishment of the etiological cause of liver damage. Laboratory tests allow to diagnose steatohepatitis in increased levels of hepatic transaminases, usually not exceeding 2–3 times the normal values. In addition to liver enzymes, increased levels of alkaline phosphatase and GGTP can also be observed in steatohepatitis. Ultrasound imaging is the most accessible instrumental tool in clinical practice to establish the primary diagnosis of hepatic steatosis. Indirect elastometry is an equally informative non-invasive method for diagnosing steatohepatitis, which allows to measure both the degree of steatosis (the function of determining the ultrasonic controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and liver fibrosis.
Aim. To systematize data on the prevalence of the combination of functional dyspepsia (FD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) using the Rome IIIIV Criteria. Materials and methods. A search in electronic databases MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane was conducted. The depth of search was 17 years (from January 2006 to May 2022). Original publications from peer-reviewed periodicals that applied the Rome IIIIV Criteria for diagnosis of FD and IBS in an adult patient population with detailed descriptive statistics to allow the resulting data to be included in the meta-analysis were selected for final analysis. Results. The final analysis included 38 studies involving 17,993 patients with FD and 15,883 patients with IBS. In the overall pool of studies using the Rome IIIIV Criteria, the pooled prevalence of FD in patients with IBS was 34.625% (95% confidence interval [CI] 28.15941.390), and the pooled prevalence of IBS in patients with FD was 37.549% (95% [CI] 31.51143.787). A random-effects model was used in the analyses since significant heterogeneity between results was found (p0.0001; I298%). Using the Rome III Criteria, the pooled prevalence of FD in patients with IBS was 31.993% (95% CI 26.13538.150; I2=98.17%), while the prevalence of IBS in patients with FD was 34.694% (95% [CI] 29.31940.273; I2=97,89%). An analysis of papers using the Rome IV Criteria demonstrated that the pooled prevalence of FD in patients with IBS was 42.614% (95% CI 18.58868.675; I2=98.97%), and the prevalence of IBS in patients with FD was 50.444% (95% CI 37.95662.904; I2=94,39%). Conclusion. This meta-analysis demonstrated that the prevalence of the combination of FD and IBS identified using the Rome IIIIV Criteria is high and is reported in approximately 1 in 3 patients with the functional gastrointestinal disorders concerned. The prevalence of a combination of FD and IBS identified using the Rome IV Criteria is at least 10% higher than that using the Rome III Criteria.
In the article we analysed the difficulties of differential diagnosis of portal hypertension, considers a clinical case that illustrates the presented theoretical material. In the presented clinical observation, the patient’s disease was manifested by bleeding from the varicose veins of the esophagus. In most cases, portal hypertension syndrome in practicing clinicians is associated with liver cirrhosis, however, it is necessary to remember about the possibility of developing subhepatic portal hypertension, in particular as a result of the formation of portal vein thrombosis. If there are signs of portal hypertension, it is necessary to specify the level of obstruction to blood flow, that is, the form of portal hypertension (subhepatic, hepatic, suprahepatic). Often, portal vein thrombosis can be formed due to undiagnosed blood diseases that occur without any clinical symptoms. The provided clinical example demonstrates a case of portal hypertension in the outcome of a chronic form of myeloproliferative syndrome. Portal cavernoma is quite rare and it is formed due to multiple small-diameter venous structures that gradually replace the occluded vessel with a system of collaterals proximal and distal to the portal vein thrombosis site. In the formation of the diagnosis the main are radiation research methods, but the conclusions should be considered only in conjunction with the clinical evidence. The clinical case is interesting because a large cavernoma of the portal vein in a patient with subhepatic portal hypertension was regarded as a «solid formation» according to magnetic resonance tomography. According to the literature data, cavernous transformation has an external similarity to the tumor process, which expands the range of differential diagnosis and requires the exclusion of oncological formations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.