The aim of this study was to compare ELISA, immunodiffusion and immunoblot for the detection of anti-Jo-1 antibodies, and to investigate the association of the results with clinical manifestations. In two medical centres for rheumatology and one for pulmonology, all patients with suspected connective tissue disease were screened over a 5-year period for anti-Jo-1 antibodies by ELISA. Positive sera were controlled in another laboratory by immunodiffusion. If immunodiffusion was negative, sera were controlled again by ELISA. ELISA-positive immunodiffusion-negative sera were tested by immunoblotting. The patients were characterised clinically, and their clinical signs and symptoms were compared with those of 257 patients with anti-Jo-1 antibodies published in 15 case series and 30 case reports. Twenty-five patients had a positive ELISA test. Fifteen sera were positive by ELISA and immunodiffusion (group 1). Three sera showed high titres in both ELISA tests with negative immunodiffusion and immunoblot (group 2). Seven sera showed low titres in both ELISA tests. The results were negative in the other tests (group 3). Patients in groups 1 and 2 could be classified as Jo-1 syndrome patients. Of these 18 patients, 15 had arthritis, 14 had myositis and 14 had interstitial lung disease. Only four patients had myositis at disease onset. We describe four unusual patients with Jo-1 syndrome in detail: 1. Long history of seronegative rheumatoid arthritis; 2. Sjögren's syndrome with Ro- and La-antibodies; 3. Scleroderma and bronchial carcinoma with centromere antibodies; 4. Corticoid-sensitive psychosis. Patients with suspected connective tissue disease may be screened for anti-Jo-1 antibodies by ELISA. It detects some patients that are missed by immunodiffusion. Especially lower ELISA titres should be controlled by another method because of the low specificity of the test. The clinical picture is variable. Most patients have features other than myositis at disease onset.
reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. carbon dioxide 30 [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] mmHg and median temperature 37.1 [36.8-37.3]°C. After removal of artefacts, the mean monitoring time was 22 h08 (8 h54). All patients had impaired cerebral autoregulation during their monitoring time. The mean IAR index was 17 (9.5) %. During H 0 H 6 and H 18 H 24 , the majority of our patients; respectively 53 and 71 % had an IAR index > 10 %. Conclusion According to our data, patients with septic shock had impaired cerebral autoregulation within the first 24 hours of their admission in the ICU. In our patients, we described a variability of distribution of impaired autoregulation according to time. ReferencesSchramm P, Klein KU, Falkenberg L, et al. Impaired cerebrovascular autoregulation in patients with severe sepsis and sepsis-associated delirium. Crit Care 2012; 16: R181. Aries MJH, Czosnyka M, Budohoski KP, et al. Continuous determination of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in traumatic brain injury. Crit. Care Med. 2012.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.