Endorectal ultrasound is currently the best method for preoperative assessment of the depth of infiltration of rectal tumors. However, rectal anatomy seems to affect staging accuracy in the lower rectum because the structure of the ampulla recti renders endosonographic examination more difficult. In addition, endosonographic layers are less well defined at this level. Both factors contribute to a lower reliability and predictive value of endorectal ultrasound staging in the lower rectum, although statistical significance was not reached in this study. On the other hand, tumor position with respect to rectal circumference does not influence the predictive value of endorectal ultrasound.
In a prospective study we examined the value of endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) in the preoperative staging of potentially locally excisable tumours. During the study period from 1.1.1991 to 1.3.1996 a total of 160 rectal tumours in 152 patients were staged endosonographically (uT/uN) and compared postoperatively with the histologic result (pT/pN) at the University Hospital of Würzburg. Thirty-eight (24%) patients had an adenoma and 15 (9%) a T1-carcinoma. In 29 (18%) cases a T2-cancer was diagnosed, further 67 (42%) and 11 (7%) patients presented with a T3 and T4 tumour, respectively. The sensitivity for adenomas and T1-Ca (uT0/1) was 81%, the specificity 98%. For T2 tumours, the sensitivity was only 41% and the specificity 92% as the majority (17 of 29) of pT2 neoplasias were overstaged (uT3). The overall staging accuracy (T1-4) was 77.5%. Two patients with a pT1-Ca and seven with a pT2-Ca had lymph node metastases which were detected preoperatively in five. The accuracy for lymph node staging was 83%. We conclude that adenomas and T1 tumours can be assessed with a high grade of accuracy using ERUS. In these tumours ERUS can be used to assist clinical decision-making (transanal vs. abdominal operation). Owing to the lack of sensitivity ERUS is of no help in the assessment of T2 carcinomas.
Contrary to general opinion, there is no substantial evidence to support the assumption that the macroscopic diagnosis of appendicitis is unreliable. High rates of conflicting diagnoses of excision specimens suggest that endoappendicitis has little clinical significance. At present, negative appendectomy rates are considerably higher for laparoscopic appendectomy than for the open approach. The role of diagnostic laparoscopy in suspected appendicitis should be reconsidered. It may be useful in particular subgroups of patients, but it is no substitute for good clinical judgment. Furthermore, it is not always necessary to perform an incidental appendectomy.
Despite the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, aggressive fluid resuscitation, vasopressor support, the mortality associated with Gram-negative sepsis and septic shock has not decreased significantly in the last two decades. The consequences of host exposure to endotoxin and the relationship of antibiotic administration to endotoxin release have become important areas of intense interest. In vitro studies have demonstrated that there was a difference in endotoxin release between PBP-3 specific antibiotics (β-lactam antibiotics) and PBP-2 specific antibiotics (carbapenems). This is the first clinical report of surgical patients admitted to the surgical and anaesthesiology intensive care unit on the missing endotoxin release after imipenem treatment; however cefotaxime and ceftriaxone showed significantly more positive endotoxin tests in the plasma when compared to imipenem. Ciprofloxacin and vancomycin were intermediate in endotoxin release and tobramycin did not cause endotoxin release. There were also significant differences in endotoxin neutralizing capacity. IL-6 levels were decreased after imipenem faster than after ceftriaxone or cefotaxime; ciprofloxacin seemed to increase IL-6. Endotoxin may be harmful in patients where the immune system has been continuously challenged. Timing, dosage, or combination with other compounds as well as the effect of antibiotics on macrophages need to be tested in larger clinical trials. In this respect a consecutive study was started.
A survey among coloproctologists was performed to assess current therapeutic concepts for the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease and anal fissure. A total of 261 clinical and non-clinical proctologists participated, representing the entire range of therapies in hospital and practise. A wealth of widely differing, in some aspects contradictory concepts were recorded, leaving almost no subject entirely undisputed. There are controversies regarding the different therapeutic alternatives as well as indications for surgery and choice of operative procedure. Future research has to address the existing controversies in order to reach a higher degree of standardization in the therapy of these common proctological disorders.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.