Long-term effects of prematurity were airway obstruction and a lower CO diffusing capacity compared with control subjects, although mean lung function parameters were within the normal range. Ex-preterms had a lower exercise level, which could not be explained by impaired lung function or smoking habits, but might be due to impaired physical fitness.
Background: After lung transplantation (LTx) exercise capacity frequently remains limited, despite significantly improved pulmonary function. The aim of this study was to evaluate maximal exercise capacity and peripheral muscle force before and 1 year after LTx, and to determine whether peripheral muscle force and lactate threshold (LT) limit exercise capacity 1 year after LTx. Methods:Twenty-five subjects (mean age 43 years, 8 women and 17 men, 4 single-lung transplantations) were included in the study. Measurements included maximal exercise capacity, lactate threshold (symptom-limited bicycle ergometer test) and muscle force test (hand-held dynamometer) were performed before and 1 year after LTx. Results:Before LTx, all patients showed severe exercise intolerance (mean Ϯ SD): work capacity (W peak ), 11.6 Ϯ 18 W; peak oxygen uptake (VO 2 ), 8.6 Ϯ 3.6 ml/min/kg. After LTx, exercise capacity improved significantly: W peak , 69 Ϯ 27 W (p Ͻ 0.001); peak VO 2 , 15.7 Ϯ 4.3 ml/min/kg (p Ͻ 0.001). Ventilatory factors did not appear to limit exercise capacity. Quadriceps muscle force pre-vs post-LTx was: 248 Ϯ 73 N vs 281 Ϯ 68 N (p Ͻ 0.05). Post-LTx, a significant correlation was found between LT and exercise capacity (r ϭ 0.76, p Ͻ 0.001), between muscle force and exercise capacity (r ϭ 0.41, p Ͻ 0.05) and between the LT and muscle force (r ϭ 0.53, p Ͻ 0.01). Conclusions:The occurrence of an early and pathologic LT and peripheral muscle weakness contributes to the limitation of exercise capacity and reflects a peripheral deficit post-LTx.
The majority of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) will grow into adulthood. Despite this improvement in survival, the disease is progressive, especially with respect to the decline in pulmonary function, which in turn may have an impact on a patient's quality of life. In this study we evaluated the quality of life in CF adults and examined the relationship between quality of life and pulmonary function, exercise capacity, and dyspnea. We assessed in 15 patients in stable clinical condition their forced expired volume in the first second (FEV1) inspiratory vital capacity (IVC), cycle exercise capacity (Wmax), and subjective degrees of dyspnea during daily living (MRC dyspnea scale). Quality of life was assessed with the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP). A sample of 100 healthy individuals, ranging in age from 18 to 30 years, served as the control group. Mean (SD) age of the patients was 25.9 (7.3) years, FEV1 was 38 (16) % predicted, IVC was 65 (17) % predicted, FEV1 IVC ratio was 46 (10) %, and Wmax was 90 (54) W. The overall SIP and physical SIP scores in CF patients were significantly higher than in the controls, indicating more impairment in overall and physical functioning In the patients than in the control group (P < 0.001). The psychosocial SIP score did not differ significantly between the two groups. Overall SIP score correlated poorly with FEV1 % predicted (r = −0.33; n.s) and IVC % predicted (r = −0.36; n.s.) but showed a better and significant relationship to the maximal exercise capacity (r = −0.57; P < 0.05). MRC dyspnea scores showed a strong correlation with overall SIP scores (r = 0.75; P < 0.001). These results show that CF affects quality of life in adults primarily due to a limitation in physical functioning. Psychosocial functioning did not differ from that of healthy controls. Exercise capacity and dyspnea scores were related to the Impairment in the quality of life. Therefore, the effects of programs aimed to improve exercise capacity and reduce dyspnea on CF patients' quality of life need to be evaluated. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1997; 23:95–100. © 1997 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.