Patient histories were obtained from 99 patients in three different ways: by a computerised patient interview (patient record), by the usual written interview (medical record), and by the transcribed record, which was a computerised version of the medical record. Patient complaints, diagnostic hypotheses, observer and record variations, and patients' and doctors' opinions were analysed for each record, and records were compared with the final diagnosis.About 40% of the data in the patient record were not present in the medical record. Two thirds of the patients said that they could express all or most of their complaints in the patient record. The doctors found that the medical record expressed the main complaints better (52%) than the patient record (15%) but that diagnostic hypotheses were more certain in the patient record (38%) than in .the medical one (26%). The number of diagnostic hypotheses in the patient record was about 20% higher than that in the medical record. Intraobserver agreement (51%) was better than interobserver agreement (32%), while the interrecord agreement varied from 25% (between the medical and patient records) to 35% (between the transcribed and patient records). One third of final diagnoses were seen in the medical
A method of comparing the referral of patients by general practitioners to medical outpatients departments at teaching hospitals in Amsterdam and Birmingham was devised. This was applied to 89 referral letters to medical specialists at the Free University Medical School Policlinic in Amsterdam and to 88 referral letters to clinics at Birmingham University Medical School, UK. The standards of referral were lower in the Netherlands than in Britain, and this may be related to differences in the health care systems, in the culture, or in the organisation of general practice. The delay between the general practitioner's referral and the consultation to the outpatient department was four times greater in Britain than in the Netherlands.
In a research project on the automation of patient histories, 99 patients in internal medicine were questioned about their opinions on computerized medical records, after having answered an automated questionnaire. Patients were very positive on being able to express their medical complaints and the large majority found it useful (94%); 68% could express all or most of their complaints, but some of their physical complaints could not be entered (47% women against 25% men). Of the male patients 74% found the range of answers from which to choose sufficient, against 52% of the women. The printed report was positively rated, with a higher appreciation by men.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.