Kindergarten, third-, and sixth-grade children were given vignettes describing experiences that were likely to produce emotional states, and their consensus about the probable affective reaction was determined. A sample of eight social and personal (private) experiences was utilized in the vignettes: success, failure, dishonesty (caught or not caught), experiencing nurturance or aggression, and experiencing justified or unjustified punishment. The potential affective reactions that children were asked to choose among included happiness, sadness, anger, fear, and neutral affect. There were no sex differences. Children of all ages agreed that relatively simple experiences such as success and nurturance would elicit a happy reaction. For other categories of experience, multiple consensuses appeared for more than one affective reaction. There were developmental differences in the affective reactions anticipated to five of the eight experience categories. Results are discussed in terms of cognitive and social learning determinants of knowledge about the experimental antecedents of emotion for oneself and others.
Two experiments with children are presented that illustrate the effects of emotional states on learning and validate experimental affect-induction procedures in which individuals dwell upon thoughts of affect-provoking experiences. Positive affective states enhanced learning, and negative states retarded it dramatically. Ratings of children's facial expressions confirmed that positive affectinduction procedures elicited happy expressions, and negative inductions elicited sad ones. Additionally, positive affect inductions enhanced children's apparent interest, involvement, and arousal, and negative inductions decreased them. These measures were related to learning but proved not to be the sole mediators of the impact of affective states on learning. The thoughts children generated for affect induction illustrated their recognition of naturalistic experiences that induce affective states. These results indicate that young children possess the potential for the cognitive self-control of their own affective states, and the effects on learning indicate that even transient mood states may produce lasting changes in behavior.Preliminary versions of this experiment constituted an undergraduate summa cum laude honors thesis by the second-named author. The able assistance of Craig Binger is gratefully acknowledged.
The authors discussed to what degree testimony from social science and mental health experts (psychologists, psychiatrists, social workers, therapists, others) meets admissibility requirements expressed by the U.S. Supreme Court in Daubert (1993), Joiner (General Electric Co. v. Joiner, 1997) and the recent Kumho (1999) decision. They reviewed data on Daubert/Kumho indicia of reliability using 2 exemplar areas of mental health testimony: psychodiagnostic assessment by means of the Rorschach and other "projective" assessment techniques and the diagnoses of posttraumatic stress disorder and multiple personality disorder (dissociative identity disorder). They concluded that some testimony offered by mental health professionals relating to these concepts should not survive scrutiny under the framework of Daubert, Joiner, and Kumho. Prior to the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993), testimony from mental health and social science experts was largely unregulated by the legal system. The Frye (Frye v. United States, 1923) standard had been in place for decades (Gianelli, 1980), requiring that to be admissible, the scientific bases of testimony must be "generally accepted" in the "field" to which they belong. This is a very lenient standard; experts can always be found who will swear that a theory is "generally accepted." Under Frye, the expert is not required to substantiate the scientific soundness of the theory by reference to proper research documenting other hallmarks of a reliable theory, such as the theory's survival of Popperian risky tests, survival of peer review, or calculable error rates. Moreover, "general acceptance" itself is usually established by the expert's say-so (subject to the finder of fact's judgment about the expert's credibility); citation of survey studies that document such acceptance are usually not required. Hence, testimony by mental health professionals regarding all sorts of controversial theories and methods has very often been admitted under Frye. The 1993 Daubert ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court changed this unfortunate situation and heightened interest in, and concern about, expert testimony based on "junk science." In Daubert, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that scientific expert
Although the recognition of the affeetive.experiences of peers is an important prerequisite for social adaptaiop."-children's ability to'recognize peers' facial displays Wemotiow remains unexamined. 'To investigate the degree to which-young children were able.'to enact expressions of emotion that were recognizable by peers and adults, and to examine the accuracy Of recognition 'as a , .function Oragend expressions-as poSad,Or-kpontaneous,'two samples (N=91 and-N=60) qf Thadrenuaged.four and fiVe,, and two samples (N=71 and-N=32) (Apr:adult university undergrailuatet rated slides of the facialAexpressiong of .,eight young-children foifouraffective sttates-happineis, sadness, anger,'and'neutrelity,-Adults were more accurate than children in'recognizing nearalstates, less accurate for 'happiness and anger, and wer'e.not superior in recognizing 'sadness. The sex and ethniCity of 'the chilazappearing:On the slides influenced only the' adult recognition of anger: The results 'indicate that hoth.acCuraoy and inacCuracy in recognizing emotional expressions are influenced by processes other than recognition. .(MCF)
The present experiment tested the hypothesis that the remediation of negative emotion will be most effective when the remedial procedure matches the experience or cognition that induced the negative state--process-specificity hypothesis. Other hypotheses examined were that negative states induced by cognitive reflection related to the self would be resistant to remediation, even by a same-process positive procedure, and that changes in emotional expressions may make it appear that a negative state has been effectively remediated when lingering effects on behavior and cognition indicate that it has not. Negative emotional states were induced in second-grade children by one of four processes, all of which involved social rejection content: cognition that focused on (a) the self (thinking about oneself being rejected by a peer) or (b) another person (thinking about a peer being rejected); or experience that related to (c) oneself (actually being socially rejected) or (d) observing another (vicarious: seeing a peer be socially rejected). These inductions were then followed by a positive, remedial induction whose content was the reverse (social acceptance) and whose process did or did not match that of the negative induction. As predicted, except for negative self-cognitions, it was found that the behavioral (altruism) and cognitive (performance on a block design task) consequences of negative emotion were alleviated when the positive remediation was of the same type as the original induction. Emotional expressions were consistently positive following remediation, regardless of their type. The results are discussed in terms of differing processes for maintaining negative emotion as a function of the character of induction, and the implications for the understanding of clinical depression in children are noted.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.