We present a new initiative and its application, namely the design of molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) for producing protein crystals which are essential for determining high-resolution 3-D structures of proteins. MIPs, also referred to as ‘smart materials’ are made to contain cavities capable of rebinding protein, thus the fingerprint of the protein created on the polymer allows it to serve as an ideal template for crystal formation. We have shown that six different MIPs induced crystallization of nine proteins, yielding crystals in conditions that do not give crystals otherwise. The incorporation of MIPs in screening experiments gave rise to crystalline hits in 8- 10% of the trials for three target proteins. These hits would have been missed using other known nucleants. MIPs also facilitated the formation of large single crystals at metastable conditions for seven proteins. Moreover, the presence of MIPs has led to faster formation of crystals in all cases where crystals would appear eventually and to major improvement in diffraction in some cases. The MIPs were effective for their cognate proteins and also for other proteins, with size-compatibility being a likely criterion for efficacy. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) measurements demonstrated specific affinity between the MIPs cavities and a protein-functionalised AFM tip, corroborating our hypothesis that due to the recognition of proteins by the cavities, MIPs can act as nucleation inducing substrates (nucleants) by harnessing the proteins themselves as templates
We have characterized the imprinting capability of a family of acrylamide polymer-based molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) for bovine hemoglobin (BHb) and trypsin (Tryp) using spectrophotometric and quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) sensor techniques. Bulk gel characterization on acrylamide (AA), N-hydroxymethylacrylamide (NHMA), and N-isopropylacrylamide (NiPAM) gave varied selectivities when compared with nonimprinted polymers. We have also harnessed the ability of the MIPs to facilitate protein crystallization as a means of evaluating their selectivity for cognate and noncognate proteins. Crystallization trials indicated improved crystal formation in the order NiPAM < AA < NHMA. QCM studies of thin film MIPs confirm this trend with N-hydroxymethyl acrylamide MIPs exhibiting best discrimination between MIP and NIP and also cognate/noncognate protein loading. Equivalent results for acrylamide MIPs suggested that the cavities were equally selective for both proteins, while N-isopropylacrylamide MIPs were not selective for either cognate BHb or noncognate BSA. All BHb MIP-QCM sensors based on AA, NHMA, or NiPAM were essentially nonresponsive to smaller, noncognate proteins. Protein crystallization studies validated the hydrophilic efficacy of MIPS indicated in the QCM studies.
An electrochemical method has been developed for the probing of hydrogel-based molecularly imprinted polymers (HydroMIPs) on the surface of a glassy carbon electrode. HydroMIPs designed for bovine haemoglobin selectivity were electrochemically characterized and their rebinding properties were monitored using cyclic voltammetry. The electrochemical reduction of bovine oxyhaemoglobin (BHb) in solution was observed to occur at -0.460 V vs (Ag/AgCl) in 150mM phosphate buffer solution (PBS). When the protein was selectively bound to the MIP, the electrochemical reduction of oxyhameoglobin could be observed at a similar peak potential of -0.480 V vs (Ag/AgCl). When analysing the non-imprinted control polymer (NIP) interfaced at the electrode, which contained no protein, the peak reduction potential corresponded to that observed for dissolved oxygen in solution (-0.65 V vs (Ag/AgCl)). MIP and NIP (in the absence of protein) were interfaced at the electrode and protein allowed to diffuse through the polymers from the bulk solution end to the electrode. It was observed that whereas NIP exhibited a protein response within 10 minutes of protein exposure, up to 45 min of exposure time was required in the case of the MIP before a protein response could be obtained. Our results suggest that due to the selective nature of the MIP, BHb arrival at the electrode via diffusion is delayed by the MIP due to attractive selective interactions with exposed cavities, but not the NIP which is devoid of selective cavities.
We have investigated the effect of buffer solution composition and pH during the preparation, washing and re-loading phases within a family of acrylamide-based molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) for bovine haemoglobin (BHb), equine myoglobin (EMb) and bovine catalyse (BCat). We investigated water, phosphate buffer saline (PBS), tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris) buffer and succinate buffer. Throughout the study MIP selectivity was highest for acrylamide, followed by N-hydroxymethylacrylamide, and then N-iso-propylacrylamide MIPs. The selectivity of the MIPs when compared with the NIPs decreased depending on the buffer conditions and pH in the order of Tris>PBS>succinate. The Tris buffer provided optimum imprinting conditions at 50 mM and pH 7.4, and MIP selectivities for the imprinting of BHb in polyacrylamide increased from an initial 8:1 to a 128:1 ratio. It was noted that the buffer conditions for the re-loading stage was important for determining MIP selectivity and the buffer conditions for the preparation stage was found to be less critical. We demonstrated that once MIPs are conditioned using Tris or PBS buffers (pH7.4) protein reloading in water should be avoided as negative effects on the MIP's imprinting capability results in low selectivities of 0.8:1. Furthermore, acidifying the pH of the buffer solution below pH 5.9 also has a negative impact on MIP selectivity especially for proteins with high isoelectric points. These buffer conditioning effects have also been successfully demonstrated in terms of MIP efficiency in real biological samples, namely plasma and serum.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.