Objective
Facial masks are an essential personal protective measure to fight the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the mask adoption rate in the US is still less than optimal. This study aims to understand the beliefs held by individuals who oppose the use of facial masks, and the evidence that they use to support these beliefs, to inform the development of targeted public health communication strategies.
Materials and Methods
We analyzed a total of 771,268 US-based tweets between January to October 2020. We developed machine-learning classifiers to identify and categorize relevant tweets, followed by a qualitative content analysis of a subset of the tweets to understand the rationale of those opposed mask wearing.
Results
We identified 267,152 tweets that contained personal opinions about wearing facial masks to prevent the spread of COVID-19. While the majority of the tweets supported mask wearing, the proportion of anti-mask tweets stayed constant at about 10% level throughout the study period. Common reasons for opposition included physical discomfort and negative effects, lack of effectiveness, and being unnecessary or inappropriate for certain people or under certain circumstances. The opposing tweets were significantly less likely to cite external sources of information such as public health agencies’ websites to support the arguments.
Discussion and Conclusion
Combining machine learning and qualitative content analysis is an effective strategy for identifying public attitudes toward mask wearing and the reasons for opposition. The results may inform better communication strategies to improve the public perception of wearing masks and, in particular, to specifically address common anti-mask beliefs.
We consider data-visualization systems where data is stored in a database, and a middleware layer translates a frontend request to a SQL query to the database to compute visual results. We focus on the problem of handling visualization requests with predetermined time constraints. We study how to rewrite the original query by adding hints and/or conducting approximations so that the total time is within the time constraint. We develop a novel middleware solution called Maliva, which adopts machine learning (ML) techniques to solve the problem. It applies the Markov Decision Process (MDP) model to decide how to rewrite queries, and uses training instances to learn an agent that can make a sequence of decisions judiciously for an online request. Our experiments on both real and synthetic datasets show that compared to the baseline approach that relies on the original SQL query, Maliva performs significantly better in terms of both the chance of serving requests interactively, and query execution time.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.