The spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 has been undergoing mutations and is highly glycosylated. It is critically important to investigate the biological significance of these mutations. Here, we investigated 80 variants and 26 glycosylation site modifications for the infectivity and reactivity to a panel of neutralizing antibodies and sera from convalescent patients. D614G, along with several variants containing both D614G and another amino acid change, were significantly more infectious. Most variants with amino acid change at receptor binding domain were less infectious, but variants including A475V, L452R, V483A, and F490L became resistant to some neutralizing antibodies. Moreover, the majority of glycosylation deletions were less infectious, whereas deletion of both N331 and N343 glycosylation drastically reduced infectivity, revealing the importance of glycosylation for viral infectivity. Interestingly, N234Q was markedly resistant to neutralizing antibodies, whereas N165Q became more sensitive. These findings could be of value in the development of vaccine and therapeutic antibodies.
This is a PDF file of a peer-reviewed paper that has been accepted for publication. Although unedited, the content has been subjected to preliminary formatting. Nature is providing this early version of the typeset paper as a service to our authors and readers. The text and figures will undergo copyediting and a proof review before the paper is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron sublineages BA.2.12.1, BA.4 and BA.5 exhibit higher transmissibility than the BA.2 lineage1. The receptor binding and immune-evasion capability of these recently emerged variants require immediate investigation. Here, coupled with structural comparisons of the spike proteins, we show that BA.2.12.1, BA.4 and BA.5 (BA.4 and BA.5 are hereafter referred collectively to as BA.4/BA.5) exhibit similar binding affinities to BA.2 for the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor. Of note, BA.2.12.1 and BA.4/BA.5 display increased evasion of neutralizing antibodies compared with BA.2 against plasma from triple-vaccinated individuals or from individuals who developed a BA.1 infection after vaccination. To delineate the underlying antibody-evasion mechanism, we determined the escape mutation profiles2, epitope distribution3 and Omicron-neutralization efficiency of 1,640 neutralizing antibodies directed against the receptor-binding domain of the viral spike protein, including 614 antibodies isolated from people who had recovered from BA.1 infection. BA.1 infection after vaccination predominantly recalls humoral immune memory directed against ancestral (hereafter referred to as wild-type (WT)) SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. The resulting elicited antibodies could neutralize both WT SARS-CoV-2 and BA.1 and are enriched on epitopes on spike that do not bind ACE2. However, most of these cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies are evaded by spike mutants L452Q, L452R and F486V. BA.1 infection can also induce new clones of BA.1-specific antibodies that potently neutralize BA.1. Nevertheless, these neutralizing antibodies are largely evaded by BA.2 and BA.4/BA.5 owing to D405N and F486V mutations, and react weakly to pre-Omicron variants, exhibiting narrow neutralization breadths. The therapeutic neutralizing antibodies bebtelovimab4 and cilgavimab5 can effectively neutralize BA.2.12.1 and BA.4/BA.5, whereas the S371F, D405N and R408S mutations undermine most broadly sarbecovirus-neutralizing antibodies. Together, our results indicate that Omicron may evolve mutations to evade the humoral immunity elicited by BA.1 infection, suggesting that BA.1-derived vaccine boosters may not achieve broad-spectrum protection against new Omicron variants.
Pseudoviruses are useful virological tools because of their safety and versatility, especially for emerging and re-emerging viruses. Due to its high pathogenicity and infectivity and the lack of effective vaccines and therapeutics, live SARS-CoV-2 has to be handled under biosafety level 3 conditions, which has hindered the development of vaccines and therapeutics. Based on a VSV pseudovirus production system, a pseudovirus-based neutralization assay has been developed for evaluating neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in biosafety level 2 facilities. The key parameters for this assay were optimized, including cell types, cell numbers, virus inoculum. When tested against the SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus, SARS-CoV-2 convalescent patient sera showed high neutralizing potency, which underscore its potential as therapeutics. The limit of detection for this assay was determined as 22.1 and 43.2 for human and mouse serum samples respectively using a panel of 120 negative samples. The cutoff values were set as 30 and 50 for human and mouse serum samples, respectively. This assay showed relatively low coefficient of variations with 15.9% and 16.2% for the intra-and inter-assay analyses respectively. Taken together, we established a robust pseudovirus-based neutralization assay for SARS-CoV-2 and are glad to share pseudoviruses and related protocols with the developers of vaccines or therapeutics to fight against this lethal virus.
The SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 variant (Omicron) contains 15 mutations on the receptor-binding domain (RBD). How Omicron would evade RBD neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) and humoral immunity requires immediate investigation. Here, we used high-throughput yeast display screening to determine the RBD escaping mutation profiles for 247 human anti-RBD NAbs identified from SARS-CoV/SARS-CoV-2 convalescents and vaccinees. Based on the results, NAbs could be unsupervised clustered into six epitope groups (A-F), which is highly concordant with knowledge-based structural classifications. Strikingly, various single mutations of Omicron could impair NAbs of different epitope groups. Specifically, NAbs in Group A-D, whose epitope overlaps with ACE2-binding motif, are largely escaped by K417N, N440K, G446S, E484A, Q493K, and G496S. Group E (S309 site) and F (CR3022 site) NAbs, which often exhibit broad sarbecovirus neutralizing activity, are less affected by Omicron, but still, a subset of NAbs are escaped by G339D, S371L, and S375F. Furthermore, B.1.1.529 pseudovirus neutralization and RBD binding assay showed that single mutation tolerating NAbs could also be escaped due to multiple synergetic mutations on their epitopes. In total, over 85% of the tested NAbs are escaped by Omicron. Regarding NAb drugs, LY-CoV016/LY-CoV555 cocktail, REGN-CoV2 cocktail, AZD1061/AZD8895 cocktail, and BRII-196 were escaped by Omicron, while VIR7831 and DXP-604 still function at reduced efficacy. Together, data suggest Omicron could cause significant humoral immune evasion, while NAbs targeting the sarbecovirus conserved region remain most effective. Our results offer instructions for developing NAb drugs and vaccines against Omicron and future variants.
Metrics & MoreArticle Recommendations CONSPECTUS: Optoelectronic material properties are governed by the whole collective of organic moieties, and these aggregate states present the characteristic performance of extended assemblies with different molecular packing, not only of single molecules themselves. Thus, controlling molecular packing is an essential issue for obtaining the optimized optical and electronic properties. It is also a great challenge because of the unclear structures and complicated intermolecular interactions, including dispersion forces, electrostatic interactions and hydrogen bonding. Moreover, upon the introduction of some external force as the stimulus source, dynamic optical properties can be achieved with the transformation of molecular packing in some cases, such as the photoinduced room temperature phosphorescence (RTP) effect, mechanochromic luminescence, the thermal treatmentdependent mechanoluminescence effect, and the optimized nonlinear optical (NLO) property achieved after electric poling. Therefore, it is essential to understand the relation between characteristics of molecular packing and the resultant optoelectronic performance at the molecular level, which becomes increasingly demanding for the further development of functional materials for their applications in organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs), chemo-and biosensors, organic solar cells, data storage, and anticounterfeiting devices. This Account gives a summary of our research on the molecular design of optoelectronic materials, with the consideration of a molecular uniting effect in different aggregated states, such as crystalline states, thin films, and nanoparticles. Through the systematical investigation of structure−packing−performance relationships, some strategies are afforded to partially control the molecular packing via the tunable size, shape, and configuration of aromatic moieties with different electronic and steric effects, together with different types of substituents as functional units to adjust the intermolecular interactions. The utilization of π−π interactions and hydrogen bonding by rational molecular design is considered as the key point to achieve the bright emission of organic materials, including the RTP and mechanoluminescence effects. Also, the dynamic optoelectronic properties are highlighted with different kinds of stimuli, including light irradiation, mechanical force, thermal treatment, and electric field, which are mainly related to the subtle molecular motions under external force and the changeable molecular packing as the metastable state. These selected examples will not only open a window for further development of organic and polymeric optoelectronic materials by the adjustable molecular packing and noncovalent interactions, but also prompt further advances for more interesting and exciting properties.
The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus has resulted in an unprecedented public health crisis. There are no approved vaccines or therapeutics for treating COVID-19. Here we reported a humanized monoclonal antibody, H014, efficiently neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV pseudoviruses as well as authentic SARS-CoV-2 at nM level by engaging the S receptor binding domain (RBD). Importantly, H014 administration reduced SARS-CoV-2 titers in the infected lungs and prevented pulmonary pathology in hACE2 mouse model. Cryo-EM characterization of the SARS-CoV-2 S trimer in complex with the H014 Fab fragment unveiled a novel conformational epitope, which is only accessible when the RBD is in open conformation. Biochemical, cellular, virological and structural studies demonstrated that H014 prevents attachment of SARS-CoV-2 to its host cell receptors. Epitope analysis of available neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 uncover broad cross-protective epitopes. Our results highlight a key role for antibody-based therapeutic interventions in the treatment of COVID-19.
Human apolipoprotein E (apoE) is one of the major determinants in lipid transport, playing a critical role in atherosclerosis and other diseases. Binding to lipid and heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPG) induces apoE to adopt active conformations for binding to lowdensity lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) family. ApoE also interacts with beta amyloid peptide, manifests critical isoform-specific effects on Alzheimer's disease. Despite the importance of apoE in these major human diseases, the fundamental questions of how apoE adjusts its structure upon binding to regulate its diverse functions remain unsolved. We report the NMR structure of apoE3, displaying a unique topology of three structural domains. The C-terminal domain presents a large exposed hydrophobic surface that likely initiates interactions with lipids, HSPG, and beta amyloid peptides. The unique topology precisely regulates apoE tertiary structure to permit only one possible conformational adaptation upon binding and provides a double security in preventing lipid-free and partiallylipidated apoE from premature binding to apoE receptors during receptor biogenesis. This topology further ensures the optimal receptor-binding activity by the fully lipidated apoE during lipoprotein transport in circulation and in the brain. These findings provide a structural framework for understanding the structural basis of the diverse functions of this important protein in human diseases.H uman apoE is one of the major determinants in lipid transport throughout the body, playing a critical role in atherosclerosis and other metabolic diseases (1). Binding to lipid and heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPG) induces apoE to adopt active conformations for low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) and LDLR-related protein (LRP)-binding (2). ApoE functions during lipid transport by binding to the LDLR family (2, 3), with the major LDLR-binding region spanning residues 130-160 (1). Three common isoforms of human apoE have been identified: ApoE3 has C112/R158, apoE4 has R112/R158, and apoE2 has C112/C158 (1). ApoE also interacts with amyloid peptide and manifests critical isoform-specific effects on several major human diseases (4-7). The most pronounced pathological effect attributes to the association of apoE4 with neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease (2). Clearly, apoE carries out diverse biological functions in several major human diseases by binding to different partners. However, fundamental questions of how apoE adjusts its structure upon binding to regulate its diverse functions remain unsolved. Because apoE isoforms only differ by one amino acid, the structural basis of this isoform-specific effect is another most challenging unanswered question for apoE to date.It was proposed that apoE contains two domains: an N-terminal (NT) domain (residues 1-191) and a C-terminal (CT) domain (residues 216-299), linked by a flexible hinge region (1). The NT domain is responsible for the LDLR-binding, yet, in isolation, binds weakly to lipids. The CT domain possesses th...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
334 Leonard St
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.