Background Conventional treatment has limited efficacy in relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphoma. Since chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) technology has shown high safety and results in high remission rates, we investigated its efficacy and safety in B-cell lymphoma treatment and analyzed potential affecting factors to provide evidence for therapeutic strategies and applications. Methods We searched databases including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane up to July 2019. Meta-analysis 1 was conducted to study the efficacy of CAR-T cell for treating B-cell lymphoma, measuring the response rate and complete remission rate as outcomes. Sub-group analysis was performed for age, pathological type, target antigen, co-stimulatory molecule, and conditioning chemotherapy. Meta-analysis 2 was undertaken on the safety of the treatment with the incidence rate of toxicity (cytokine-releasing syndrome [CRS], neurotoxicity) as an outcome. Results Seventeen studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. It was found that CAR-T cells had good therapeutic effects in the following cases: B-cell lymphoma (patients ≥65 years old); diffuse large B-cell lymphoma pathological type; patients with treatment target antigen other than CD19; patients treated with co-stimulatory molecules other than CD28, including 4-1BB+CD28 or 4-1BB; and patients treated with cyclophosphamide/fludarabine pre-treatment protocol conditioning chemotherapy. Although the CRS and neurotoxicity incidences were high, most were reversible with minimal risk of death. Conclusion CAR-T cell treatment is safe for clinical application; however, toxicity effects should be monitored.

No abstract

BACKGROUNDThe safety and efficacy of dapoxetine for the treatment of premature ejaculation (PE) is still controversial. Thus, we decided to conduct a meta-analysis using trial sequential analysis (TSA) to determine the sufficiency of conclusions.OBJECTIVEEvaluate the efficacy and safety of dapoxetine in the treatment of patients with PE and assess the reliability of the findings.DESIGNMeta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).METHODSElectronic databases including PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CNKI and Wanfang data were reviewed up to July 2017. RCTs evaluating the efficacy of dapoxetine in patients with PE and reporting intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT), patient global impression of change (PGIC) and/or adverse events (AEs) were included.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESMean differences between trials in efficacy for IELT, and risk ratios for PGIC and treatment-emergent AEs.SAMPLE8 RCTs.RESULTSFor IELT and PGIC, significant effects were found for all doses of dapoxetine versus placebo, and similar results were obtained in subgroups of the 30-mg dose versus 60-mg dose. There were also statistically different dose-related effects on AEs. Trial sequential analysis showed that the result of our meta-analysis was confirmed and further trials are unnecessary.CONCLUSIONSThe evidence suggests that dapoxetine may be a safe and effective drug for patients with PE.REGISTRATIONNot registered, no published protocol.

Background:Shexiang Baoxin Pills (SBP) is widely used for the treatment of unstable angina pectoris (UAP) in China. However, the clinical evidence on the efficacy of SBP for the treatment of UAP is not well concluded.Methods:Seven electronic databases will be searched for eligible studies: MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, Wanfang database, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure database, VIP database, and Chinese Biological and Medicine database. Data of included studies will be extracted, and quality will be evaluated. Data synthesis will be performed using RevMan software. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis will also be carried out. Publication bias will be evaluated using funnel plot if included studies are sufficient.Results:This systemic review and meta-analysis will provide synthesized result of clinical efficacy of SBP for the treatment of UAP.Conclusions:This systemic review and meta-analysis will provide high-quality evidence on the clinical efficacy of SBP for the treatment of UAP.Registration:PEROSPERO CRD42019124668

BackgroundDiagnosing primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) remains a challenge. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are promising noninvasive markers for the identification of PCNSL. The present study aims to assess the diagnostic value of miRNAs for PCNSL patients as biomarkers.MethodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library from inception to January 31, 2021. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), together with the summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curve, and the area under the SROC curve (AUC) value were used to estimate the overall diagnostic performance. We used Q statistic and I2 to test heterogeneity and used subgroup analyses to investigate the source of heterogeneity. The statistical analyses were independently performed by two investigators using Stata 14.0 and Revman 5.3.ResultsIn total, 11 studies from 6 records were included in the current meta-analysis with 281 PCNSL patients and 367 controls. Our statistical analysis demonstrated that the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC were 0.91 (95% CI 0.84–0.95), 0.88 (95% CI 0.84–0.91), 7.48 (95% CI 5.71–9.78), 0.11 (95% CI 0.06–0.19), 70 (95% CI 35–142), and 0.90 (95% CI 0.87–0.92), respectively. The studies had substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 54%, 95% CI 0–100). Two subgroup analyses were conducted based on the type of specimen and miRNAs profiled.ConclusionsThis meta-analysis indicated that miRNAs were suitable as noninvasive diagnostic biomarkers for PCNSL with high accuracy. In addition, both cerebrospinal fluid-based and blood-based miRNAs assays for PCNSL detection were considered reliable for clinical application. MicroRNA-21 assays also seemed to be more accurate in the diagnosis of PCNSL. Good quality studies with large samples should be conducted to verify our results.