The Muller F element (4.2 Mb, ~80 protein-coding genes) is an unusual autosome of Drosophila melanogaster; it is mostly heterochromatic with a low recombination rate. To investigate how these properties impact the evolution of repeats and genes, we manually improved the sequence and annotated the genes on the D. erecta, D. mojavensis, and D. grimshawi F elements and euchromatic domains from the Muller D element. We find that F elements have greater transposon density (25–50%) than euchromatic reference regions (3–11%). Among the F elements, D. grimshawi has the lowest transposon density (particularly DINE-1: 2% vs. 11–27%). F element genes have larger coding spans, more coding exons, larger introns, and lower codon bias. Comparison of the Effective Number of Codons with the Codon Adaptation Index shows that, in contrast to the other species, codon bias in D. grimshawi F element genes can be attributed primarily to selection instead of mutational biases, suggesting that density and types of transposons affect the degree of local heterochromatin formation. F element genes have lower estimated DNA melting temperatures than D element genes, potentially facilitating transcription through heterochromatin. Most F element genes (~90%) have remained on that element, but the F element has smaller syntenic blocks than genome averages (3.4–3.6 vs. 8.4–8.8 genes per block), indicating greater rates of inversion despite lower rates of recombination. Overall, the F element has maintained characteristics that are distinct from other autosomes in the Drosophila lineage, illuminating the constraints imposed by a heterochromatic milieu.

Developing sensors in the domains of food safety, soil analysis, water quality monitoring and healthcare often requires distinguishing between different species of bacteria. The most rapid, sensitive and specific method to identify bacteria is by analysing their DNA sequence, which comprises of disinfection and lysis of bacterial cells, amplification of the isolated DNA and detection of the amplified sequence. Seamless integration of these assays on a paper substrate remains a big challenge in paperfluidic nucleic acid analyis.Combining lysis and isothermal amplification in a single reaction step is difficult because the porosity of paper and the presence of cell debris following lysis reduces the efficiency of DNA amplification. On the other hand, extracting and purifying the DNA after lysis to improve the amplification efficiency involves addition of chemical reagents, one or more wash steps and manual intervention. This problem is even more complex for mycobacteria as its thick cell wall structure impedes lysis and the high GC-content of the genome requires careful optimization of enzymatic denaturation during isothermal amplification. Here we successfully combine thermal lysis and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) into a single reaction step on paper without the need for any intermediate intervention. We demonstrate our integrated assay by amplifying DNA from 100 CFU/mL of Escherichia coli (MG1655) and Mycobacterium smegmatis (mc 2 155) cells in 30 min on a paper substrate. We also confirm that E. coli and M. smegmatis can be completely disinfected on paper by heating at 60 o C for 5 min and 15 min respectively, making this assay safe and suitable for incorporation into diverse paperfluidic sensors for field use.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Developing sensors in the domains of food safety, soil analysis, water quality monitoring and healthcare often requires distinguishing between different species of bacteria. The most rapid, sensitive and specific method to identify bacteria is by analysing their DNA sequence, which comprises of disinfection and lysis of bacterial cells, amplification of the isolated DNA and detection of the amplified sequence. Seamless integration of these assays on a paper substrate remains a big challenge in paperfluidic nucleic acid analyis.Combining lysis and isothermal amplification in a single reaction step is difficult because the porosity of paper and the presence of cell debris following lysis reduces the efficiency of DNA amplification. On the other hand, extracting and purifying the DNA after lysis to improve the amplification efficiency involves addition of chemical reagents, one or more wash steps and manual intervention. This problem is even more complex for mycobacteria as its thick cell wall structure impedes lysis and the high GC-content of the genome requires careful optimization of enzymatic denaturation during isothermal amplification. Here we successfully combine thermal lysis and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) into a single reaction step on paper without the need for any intermediate intervention. We demonstrate our integrated assay by amplifying DNA from 100 CFU/mL of Escherichia coli (MG1655) and Mycobacterium smegmatis (mc 2 155) cells in 30 min on a paper substrate. We also confirm that E. coli and M. smegmatis can be completely disinfected on paper by heating at 60 o C for 5 min and 15 min respectively, making this assay safe and suitable for incorporation into diverse paperfluidic sensors for field use.

Minimum Run Resolution IV screening design was employed to study important process factors to maximize Dry cell weight (DCW) and Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) production by Massilia spp. From screening design, it was observed that maltose, NH4HPO4, Na2HPO4 and K2HPO4 were found to be significantly affecting DCW and PHA production. A three-level-four-factor central composite design (CCD) was employed in combination with response surface methodology (RSM) to optimize the concentration of screened factors. The statistical analysis of results showed that maltose and NH4HPO4 had a positive effect whereas Na2HPO4, K2HPO4 had a negative effect on DCW and PHA production. By using RSM, optimum concentration of significant factors was found to be as follows: maltose: 30.0 g/l, NH4HPO4: 3.0 g/l, Na2HPO4: 3.0 g/l, K2HPO4: 3.0 g/l. Verification of the predicted value resulted into a yield of 25.5 g/l of DCW and 6 g/l of PHA.