Foreign body aspiration in children is a medical emergency that is associated with significant morbidity and requires medical intervention. The variability of clinical presentations results in delayed diagnosis and treatment. Hence, a high index of clinical suspicion and a thorough examination is needed to expedite the management. We report the case of a toddler girl who aspirated a piece of peanut and was diagnosed as having bronchopneumonia upon presentation with respiratory symptoms for six days. Rigid bronchoscopy was performed and the foreign body was removed successfully without any complications. We aim to highlight the importance of considering the diagnosis of airway foreign body in children with unexplained respiratory distress in our case study.
Scoring systems such as the Modified Alvarado Score (MAS) can help in the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA) but is cumbersome to use and has not found widespread popularity. A more robust, user-friendly Simplified Appendicitis Score (SAS) was investigated. Methods: Patients presenting with suspected AA were prospectively enrolled. The performance of the SAS (using only 5 variables − migratory pain, right lower quadrant tenderness, rebound pain, fever >37.3 degrees Celsius and leucocytosis >12,000/ uL) was analysed and compared to the MAS. Results: Out of 238 patients enrolled over four months, 95 (39.9%) patients underwent appendectomy, of which 81 patients had histologically proven AA. A MAS of ≥8 was 92.4% specific for ruling in AA, while a score of <5 was 91.4% sensitive in ruling out AA. A SAS of ≥6 was 91.7% specific for ruling in AA, while a score of <4 was 90.1% sensitive in ruling out AA. Conclusions: The performance of the MAS can be maintained by omitting the two subjective variables − "anorexia" and "nausea/vomiting", and increasing the leucocytosis cutoff level. A SAS using only 5 variables performed as well as the original MAS.
Dengue is the most important mosquito borne viral disease in the world. It is endemic in South and Southeast Asia, Central and Latin America, and Africa. One of its manifestations is dengue shock syndrome (DSS), a medical emergency with a very high mortality. Cardiac involvement is a known but infrequent feature of dengue. Cardiac dysfunction may complicate management of hypotension in DSS. We report a case of a 16-year-old male presenting with fulminant DSS as well as perimyocarditis that both confounded the clinical picture and complicated the clinical management.
A 29-year-old man was brought to the hospital for treatment after an alleged workplace accident. Initial assessment revealed only mild chest injury and mild confusion, with no other injury. His vision was unaffected with no relative afferent pupillary defect. A computed tomography scan of the brain, performed to rule out brain injury, revealed an incidental finding of a foreign body in the left intravitreal cavity with no other significant findings. Further examination of his medical history revealed that he had experienced a trauma one year earlier, in which his left eye was pierced by a projectile. Immediately post-trauma, his vision had been reduced significantly, but improved over the next few weeks without medical treatment. The current examination of his left eye revealed a small hyperpigmented area on the sclera, representing the point of entry of his previous wound. An encapsulated foreign body was observed in the inferior intravitreal cavity, surrounded by retinal atrophy, and a normal posterior pole. He was managed conservatively without complications. The decision to remove a missed retained intraocular foreign body is complex and depends on multiple factors, including surgical difficulty and the composition, size, and location of the retained foreign body. Removal should be weighed against the possible serious complications of intraocular surgery. If removal is surgically difficult, or the retained material is inert, patients can be managed conservatively with regular monitoring.
This study compared demand-valve nitrous oxide (Entonox) with intravenous regional anaesthesia (IVRA) as analgesia in adults with distal radius fractures requiring manipulation and reduction (M&R) in the Emergency Department. Materials and methods: All adults presenting to the Emergency Department of Changi General Hospital, Singapore between August to December 2000 with closed distal radius fractures requiring M&R were enrolled. Five parameters were measured: pain perception using visual analogue scale (VAS), patient acceptance, procedure time, complication rate and failed manipulation. Results: Of the 67 patients enrolled, 32 received IVRA and 35 received Entonox. The average VAS was 2.2 cm for the IVRA group and 5.8 cm for the Entonox group (p<0.0001). The average procedure time was 25.6 minutes for the IVRA group and 11.1 minutes for the Entonox group (p<0.0001). Twenty-seven IVRA patients (84.4%) and 24 Entonox patients (68.6%) would agree to the same analgesia given similar circumstances (p=0.159). Four patients who received Entonox (11.4%) experienced minor complications, while no complications were noted in the IVRA group (p=0.115). Two patients who received IVRA (6.3%) and 8 patients who received Entonox (22.9%) required more than a single attempt at M&R (p=0.086). Conclusion: The use of Entonox, compared to IVRA, was associated with significantly shorter procedure time but significantly higher pain scores, with no significant difference in terms of patient acceptance, complication rate or failed manipulation rate. Entonox is an effective analgesic alternative to IVRA in adult patients requiring M&R for distal radius fractures in the Emergency Department. Its use is ideal in situations where IVRA is unsuitable or contraindicated.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.