Our study suggests that PPL occurs more frequently at antero-lateral and postero-medial segments of MVA. This finding might be linked to unusual anatomical and functional factors of the MVA and may call for adjunctive care to these sectors of MVA when performing suture placement during MVR.
SummaryIt is already known that activation of the coagulation and fibrinolytic system occurs in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We have thus studied twenty patients (10 treated with aprotinin during CPB and 10 untreated) both during the intraoperative period and during thirty days follow up. In untreated patients D-dimer levels increased 4-fold during CPB and the levels were above baseline for the whole follow up (p<0.0001). D-dimer levels were reduced in aprotinin treated patients in comparison to untreated patients (p = 0.0172); levels then gradually increased to the values of the untreated patients over the following 24 h later and remained higher during the thirty day follow up. The behavior of haemostatic variables in the 24 h after CPB did not vary between untreated and aprotinin treated patients. In particular, five minutes after protamine sulphate administration, levels of F1 + 2 and TAT rose significantly (p = 0.0054, p = 0.0022 respectively), whereas fibrinogen significantly decreased (p<0.0001) and PAI-1 antigen levels were reduced. Two days after CPB the concentrations of F1 + 2 and TAT lowered, whereas fibrinogen and PAI-1 antigen levels increased. On the 5th, 8th and 30th days after CPB, F1 + 2 and TAT levels remained higher than those reported at baseline in both groups of patients, whereas fibrinogen levels increased over basal levels in aprotinin treated patients only.Thus, in addition to the activation of the coagulation and fibrinolytic system occurring during the intraoperative period, in patients undergoing CPB, there are alterations of haemostatic variables up to thirty days from surgery.
Aims
We sought to analyze the early and follow-up results of minimally invasive video-assisted mitral valve repair. With particular focus on degenerative disease, results were stratified according to type of lesion, strategy of repair and surgical technique.
Methods
We retrospectively built a database over 241 patients who received mitral repair for severe regurgitation through right minithoracotomy in the 2009–17 period. Cause was degenerative in 92.1%, restrictive in 5.8% and mixed in the remainders. Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up (98.7% complete, average duration 2.9 years ± 1.4) was obtained through contact of in-house and territorial cardiologists. Recurrent mitral regurgitation at follow-up was defined as being at least mild-to-moderate (2+).
Results
Operative mortality was 1.7%, and related to the technique in one case. Five-year actuarial survival was 95% ± 2; there was no valve-related death and one reoperation. At follow-up, we observed eight cases of 2+ regurgitation and one instance of 4+ regurgitation (4-year actuarial freedom: 92% ± 4). Freedom from recurrent regurgitation was significantly lower in the ‘restrictive’ subgroup vs. the ‘degenerative’ subgroup (P = 0.02); no statistically significant difference in freedom from recurrence was observed among patients who received mitral repair using a ‘resect’ vs. ‘nonresection’ strategy (P = 0.46), and in those who received the Totally Endoscopic technique (endoaortic balloon occlusion, no costal spreading) vs. controls (external aortic clamp, costal spreading) (P = 0.98).
Conclusion
Durability of minimally invasive mitral repair is optimal. Nonresection repair techniques are at least noninferior to previous approaches based on leaflet resection.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.