No abstract

No abstract

BACKGROUND: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is increasingly used in the management of acute and chronic respiratory failure. Little is known about the optimal settings for HFNC. This study was designed to assess the dose effect of HFNC on respiratory effort indexes and respiratory patterns in spontaneously breathing adults. METHODS: A randomized controlled crossover study was conducted in 10 healthy subjects. Five experimental conditions were evaluated: baseline with no therapy; 5 L/min with conventional nasal prongs; and HFNC at 20, 40, and 60 L/min. The primary outcomes were the indexes of respiratory effort (ie, esophageal pressure swing [DP es ], esophageal pressure-time product, and work of breathing). Secondary outcomes included breathing pattern parameters and blood gases. Dead-space ventilation and washout were calculated based on minute ventilation, breathing frequency, and Radford equations. RESULTS: DP es increased from median (interquartile range [IQR] 3.2 (2.2-3.6) cm H 2 O at baseline to median (IQR) 5.7 (4.6-6.8) cm H 2 O at 60 L/min (P < .001). Neither esophageal pressure-time product nor work of breathing were modified during the tested conditions. The minute volume was significantly reduced at 40 and 60 L/min compared with baseline (P 5 .04), mostly driven by an important and dose-dependent reduction in breathing frequency, from median (IQR) 16 (15-18) breaths/min at baseline, to median (IQR) 8 (7-10) breaths/min at 60 L/min (P < .001). Capillary P CO 2 was stable in all the tested conditions. The calculated dead-space ventilation was reduced by half with HFNC. CONCLUSIONS: HFNC did not significantly modify work of breathing in healthy subjects. However, a significant reduction in the minute volume was achieved, capillary P CO 2 remaining constant, which suggests a reduction in dead-space ventilation with flows > 20 L/min. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT02495675). Key words: high flow nasal cannula; dead space; work of breathing; respiratory pattern; respiratory inductive plethysmography.

BACKGROUND: Different filtering devices are used during mechanical ventilation to avoid dysfunction of flow and pressure transducers or for airborne microorganisms containment. Water condensates, resulting from the use of humidifiers, but also residual nebulization particles may have a major influence on expiratory limb resistance. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of nebulization and active humidification on the resistance of expiratory filters. METHODS: A respiratory system analog was constructed using a test lung, an ICU ventilator, heated humidifiers, and a piezoelectric nebulizer. Humidifiers were connected to different types of circuits (unheated, mono-heated, new-generation and old-generation bi-heated). Five filter types were evaluated: electrostatic, heat-and-moisture exchanger, standard, specific, and internal heated high-efficiency particulate air [HEPA] filter. Baseline characteristics were obtained from each dry filter. Differential pressure measurements were carried out after 24 hours of continuous in vitro use for each condition, and after 24 hours of use with an old-generation bi-heated circuit without nebulization. RESULTS: While using unheated circuits, measurements had to be interrupted before 24 hours for all the filtering devices except the internal heated HEPA filter. The heat-and-moisture exchangers occluded before 24 hours with the unheated and mono-heated circuits. The circuit type, nebulization practice, and duration of use did not influence the internal heated HEPA filter resistance. CONCLUSION: Expiratory limb filtration is likely to induce several major adverse events. Expiratory filter resistance increase is due mainly to the humidification circuit type, rather than to nebulization. If filtration is mandatory while using an unheated circuit, a dedicated filter should be used for < 24 hours, or a heated HEPA for a longer duration.