Jacobs, J. M., Merriman, P. (2011). Practising architectures. Social and Cultural Geography, 12 (3), 211-222, Article Number: PII 936332143, (Special Issue).The papers contained in this special issue contribute to a recently revitalised scholarship on architecture within social and cultural geography. New direction was given to established geographies of architecture by Lees's (2001) call for geographers to move beyond an emphasis on symbolic meaning (representationalism) and towards a consideration of ?the practical and effective or ?non-representational? import of architecture? (2001: 51). In the past decade social and cultural geographers have responded to this call and, in the process, reshaped the geography of architecture. The papers collected here make further contributions to that scholarship. The starting point for our own thinking, and the initial call for papers that generated the content herein, was the concept of ?practising architectures?.Peer reviewe

No abstract

Over the past, few years a broad range of scholars have been emphasising the vital importance of methodological innovation and diversification to mobilities research. Whilst welcoming this pluralisation of research methods, this paper encourages a note of caution amongst researchers who wholly embrace the call for mobile methods, which are frequently justified by an assumption that 'conventional' or 'traditional' methods have failed. I outline some of the explanations that are given for the development of 'mobile methods' -including their inevitable emergence from a 'new mobilities paradigm', the importance of innovation and political relevance for social science methods, and their importance for apprehending elusive practices -before identifying a number of problems with this work: namely the assumption that mobilities research is necessarily a branch of social science research, the production of over-animated mobile subjects and objects, the prioritising of certain kinds of research methods and practices, and the overreliance on certain kinds of technology. Particular attention is paid to the use of 'non-representational theories' and theories of practice in mobilities research, wherein academics frequently suggest that we must adopt certain performative, participative, or ethnographic techniques to enable researchers to be, see or move with research subjects, and to more effectively or accurately understand those practices and subjects. In the final section, I draw upon historical research on early driving practices to highlight the diverse methods and sources that can be useful for mobilities scholars seeking to apprehend particular practices, events, subjects and spaces.

No abstract

No abstract