No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

The continuous depletion of forests calls for the astute usage of existing resources. Fungi and termites cause serious damage to biomass under storage and service conditions. Various protective treatments with high amounts of toxic chemicals are used by the wood and bamboo industry. Efforts are being made the world over to develop environmentally friendly preservatives for wood and bamboo species. Recent research highlights the potential and effectiveness of traditional practices and procedures, mainly water leaching technique and smoke treatment. Under laboratory conditions, the service life of treated blocks were found to be at a par with commercial chemical preservative treated blocks. Various plant extracts and oil-based formulations, such as organic acids, essential oils, and eco-friendly chemical-based preservatives, are in the stage of development. The bio-efficacy of such preservatives is measured in terms of the improvement in resistance to fungi and termites. However, much work still needs to be done to completely determine the efficacy of many of these newly developed preservatives and techniques. The present paper discusses an overview of the developments in the field of environment-friendly biomass preservatives.

Inhaled toxic chemicals and particulates are known to disrupt lung homeostasis causing pulmonary toxicity and tissue injury. However, biomarkers of such exposures and their underlying mechanisms are poorly understood, especially for emerging toxicants such as engineered nanoparticles and chemical threat agents such as chlorine gas (Cl2). Aquaporins (AQPs), commonly referred to as water channels, are known to play roles in lung homeostasis and pathophysiology. However, little is known on their regulation in toxicant-induced lung injuries. Here, we compared four lung toxicity models namely, acute chemical exposure (Cl2)-, chronic particulate exposure (carbon nanotubes/CNT)-, chronic chemical exposure (cigarette smoke extract/CSE)-, and a chronic co-exposure (CNT + CSE)- model, for modulation of lung aquaporins (AQPs 1, 3, 4, and 5) in relation to other pathophysiological endpoints. These included markers of compromised state of lung mucosal lining [mucin 5b (MUC5B) and surfactant protein A (SP-A)] and lung-blood barrier [protein content in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid and, cell tight junction proteins occludin and zona-occludens]. The results showed toxicity model-specific regulation of AQPs measured in terms of mRNA abundance. A differential upregulation was observed for AQP1 in acute Cl2 exposure model (14.71-fold; p = 0.002) and AQP3 in chronic CNT exposure model (3.83-fold; p = 0.044). In contrast, AQP4 was downregulated in chronic CSE model whereas AQP5 showed no significant change in any of the models. SP-A and MUC5B expression showed a decreasing pattern across all toxicity models except the acute Cl2 toxicity model, which showed a highly significant upregulation of MUC5B (25.95-fold; p = 0.003). This was consistent with other significant pathophysiological changes observed in this acute model, particularly a compromised lung epithelial-endothelial barrier indicated by significantly increased protein infiltration and expression of tight junction proteins, and more severe histopathological (structural and immunological) changes. To our knowledge, this is the first report on lung AQPs as molecular targets of the study toxicants. The differentially regulated AQPs, AQP1 in acute Cl2 exposure versus AQP3 in chronic CNT nanoparticle exposure, in conjunction with the corresponding differentially impacted pathophysiological endpoints (particularly MUC5B) could potentially serve as predictive markers of toxicant type-specific pulmonary injury and as candidates for future investigation for clinical intervention.