BackgroundThe high mortality of hip fracture patients is well documented, but sex- and cause-specific mortality after hip fracture has not been extensively studied. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate mortality and cause of death in patients after hip fracture surgery and to compare their mortality and cause of death to those in the general population.MethodsRecords of 428 consecutive hip fracture patients were collected on a population-basis and data on the general population comprising all Finns 65 years of age or older were collected on a cohort-basis. Cause of death was classified as follows: malignant neoplasms, dementia, circulatory disease, respiratory disease, digestive system disease, and other.ResultsMean follow-up was 3.7 years (range 0-9 years). Overall 1-year postoperative mortality was 27.3% and mortality after hip fracture at the end of the follow-up was 79.0%. During the follow-up, age-adjusted mortality after hip fracture surgery was higher in men than in women with hazard ratio (HR) 1.55 and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.21-2.00. Among hip surgery patients, the most common causes of death were circulatory diseases, followed by dementia and Alzheimer's disease. After hip fracture, men were more likely than women to die from respiratory disease, malignant neoplasm, and circulatory disease. During the follow-up, all-cause age- and sex-standardized mortality after hip fracture was 3-fold higher than that of the general population and included every cause-of-death category.ConclusionDuring the study period, the risk of mortality in hip fracture patients was 3-fold higher than that in the general population and included every major cause of death.

A waterborne epidemic took place in a Finnish municipality in April 1994. Some 1500-3000 people, i.e. 25-50% of the population, had symptomatic acute gastroenteritis. Laboratory findings confirmed adenovirus, a Norwalk-like agent, small round viruses (SRV), and group A and C rotaviruses as causative agents, Norwalk virus being the main cause of the outbreak. The epidemic was most probably associated with contaminated drinking water. The groundwater well, situated in the embankment of a river, was contaminated by polluted river water during the spring flood. A back flow from the river to the well had occurred via a forgotten drainage pipe.

Use of potent anticholinergic drugs emerged as an independent predictor of excess mortality in men at 3 months and 3 years. Presence of cardiovascular disease and chronic lung disease were independent risk factors for excess mortality at 6 months and 3 years in men. In addition, chronic lung disease independently predicted excess mortality at 30 days. Use of potent anticholinergics should be evaluated critically after hip fracture surgery, especially in men with cardiovascular or chronic lung diseases.

We conducted a randomized case control study of referrals from a primary care centre in Finland. All the consultations and referrals from seven general practitioners (GPs) dealt with by internists and surgeons at Satakunta Central Hospital in Pori and geriatricians at Satalinna Hospital in Harjavalta over five months were included. For patients in the control group, a conventional referral letter was sent to the hospital outpatient clinic. For patients in the intervention group, the GPs had to decide whether they wanted an electronic consultation with the hospital or wanted to refer the patient (i.e. to transfer responsibility for treatment). Communication with the hospital specialist was then via a secure Web-based system. Ninety-three patients consented to participate in the study. None refused, although there were 15 non-attenders. Satisfaction data were collected from questionnaires completed by the patients and doctors. All the patients treated by teleconsultation said that they wanted the same procedure in future and 63% of the control group said they would prefer a teleconsultation next time. The doctors quickly learned to exploit the telemedicine model successfully. The responsibility for treatment was maintained in the health centre in 52% of cases using teleconsultation, without any visit to hospital being required. The GPs and the hospital doctors agreed on the follow-up treatment. Telereferral increased the possibility of the GP maintaining responsibility for the treatment. The reduced number of hospital visits in the telemedicine model should produce significant cost savings.

We carried out a prospective study of realtime videoconferencing in surgical consultations. Videoconferencing equipment at the Satakunta Central Hospital, Pori, was connected by ISDN at 384 kbit/s to two health centres in the cities of Kankaanpää and Huittinen (55 and 60 km from Pori, respectively). A document camera was used to transmit images of radiographs and paper documents. Fifty patients who needed a surgical consultation were examined by a doctor in the health centres, and the surgeon interviewed and observed the physical examination by videoconference. The consultation time ranged from 12 to 23 min (mean 15 min). Technically the equipment functioned reliably and the quality of the video-picture was good. According to the consulting surgeon, the decision made in the videoconference was reliable in 48 cases (96%). According to the doctors in the health centres, the consultation was useful in 49 cases (98%) and was considered satisfactory in one. The doctors thought that the teleconsultation was as reliable as an outpatient appointment in 49 cases (98%). The educational benefit of the consultation was excellent or good in 38 cases (76%). The overall satisfaction of patients was very good or good in 45 cases (96%). All patients, except one, avoided travelling to a face-to-face appointment because they received a definite treatment decision during the teleconsultation.