The repercussions of the COVID-19 pandemic on children’s lives deserve attention. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of anxiety among Brazilian children and its associated factors during social distancing during COVID-19. We used a cross-sectional design with an online survey from April to May 2020 in Brazil. We included children aged 6–12 years and their guardians. The Children’s Anxiety Questionnaire (CAQ; scores 4–12) and the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS; scores 0–10) were used to measure anxiety. We enrolled 157 girls and 132 boys, with a mean age of 8.84 (±2.05) years; 88.9% of respondents were mothers. Based on CAQ ≥ 9, the prevalence of anxiety was 19.4% (n = 56), and higher among children with parents with essential jobs and those who were social distancing without parents. In logistic regression, the following variables were associated with higher CAQ scores: social distancing without parents; more persons living together in home; and education level of guardians. Based on NRS > 7, the prevalence of anxiety was 21.8% (n = 63); however, no associations with NRS scores were found with the investigated variables. These findings suggest the necessity of implementing public health actions targeting these parents and their children at the population level.
A criação de ligas acadêmicas por estudantes de Medicina tem ocorrido em todo o Brasil. Aceitas como atividades extracurriculares de extensão universitária, as ligas trazem tanto benefícios como riscos à formação médica. Assim, a abertura de ligas deveria ser racionalizada, visando ao aperfeiçoamento de suas atividades. Neste relato, descrevemos a normatização adotada na Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu - Universidade Estadual Paulista (FMB/Unesp), contextualizando- a numa discussão sobre a importância das ligas como atividades extracurriculares e os prejuízos que podem trazer à formação médica. A normatização contém orientações processuais e um conjunto de critérios para avaliação dos projetos de abertura de novas ligas. Os critérios avaliam a relevância da proposta, os objetivos, o modelo de gestão planejado e a ideologia da formação. A utilização destas diretrizes tem capacitado o desenvolvimento de projetos de novas ligas e desencadeado na escola o aprofundamento de reflexões sobre a função de ligas acadêmicas.
RESUMO O Teste de Progresso é uma ferramenta de avaliação longitudinal do ganho de conhecimento de estudantes que tem sido aplicada no Brasil há mais de dez anos. O teste situa o estudante em seu processo evolutivo de ensino-aprendizagem e permite à instituição realizar o diagnóstico de suas deficiências ao longo da estrutura curricular. Ele pode ser utilizado pelos colegiados competentes para avaliação de alterações curriculares e avaliações específicas de disciplinas ou módulos de ensino. Com base na experiência de um consórcio de escolas, a Associação Brasileira de Educação Médica (Abem) propôs um projeto que tinha como um de seus objetivos incentivar escolas de todo o País a adotarem o Teste de Progresso como uma de suas ferramentas de avaliação. Reportamos a estratégia adotada para constituir núcleos interinstitucionais de avaliação com Teste de Progresso, bem como os resultados da primeira prova nacional do Teste de Progresso, que contou com a participação de 58 escolas e 23.065 estudantes. A implantação de núcleos interinstitucionais de Teste do Progresso com processos colaborativos de realização da prova representou um avanço para as escolas envolvidas. As escolas iniciaram um processo de colaboração não apenas para o Teste de Progresso, mas também para o intercâmbio de informações e experiências que trocam com base no conhecimento de cada uma. O projeto funcionou como o início de um movimento para que escolas médicas de todas as regiões do País adotem o Teste de Progresso como uma ferramenta de avaliação com potencial para reorientar a formação médica, ao fornecer um diagnóstico de formação em nível individual e institucional.
RESUMO
Ligas Acadêmicas têm ocupado o cotidiano do estudante de
KEYWORDS-Education, Medical.-Curriculum.-Univeristy Extension.-Student Leagues.-Students, Medical.-Community Institutional Relations.
ABSTRACT
Student Leagues have gained increasing presence in the everyday
Extraparenchymal neurocysticercosis has an aggressive course because cysts in the cerebrospinal fluid compartments induce acute inflammatory reactions. The relationships between symptoms, imaging findings, lesion type and location remain poorly understood. In this retrospective clinical records-based study, we describe the clinical symptoms, magnetic resonance imaging features, and cyst distribution in the CSF compartments of 36 patients with extraparenchymal neurocysticercosis. Patients were recruited between 1995 and 2010 and median follow up was 38 months. During all the follow up time we found that 75% (27/36) of the patients had symptoms related to raised intracranial pressure sometime, 72.2% (26/36) cysticercotic meningitis, 61.1% (22/36) seizures, and 50.0% (18/36) headaches unrelated to intracranial pressure. Regarding lesion types, 77.8% (28/36) of patients presented with grape-like cysts, 22.2% (8/36) giant cysts, and 61.1% (22/36) contrast-enhancing lesions. Hydrocephalus occurred in 72.2% (26/36) of patients during the follow-up period. All patients had cysts in the subarachnoid space and 41.7% (15/36) had at least one cyst in some ventricle. Cysts were predominantly located in the posterior fossa (31 patients) and supratentorial basal cisterns (19 patients). The fourth ventricle was the main compromised ventricle (10 patients). Spinal cysts were more frequent than previously reported (11.1%, 4/36). Our findings are useful for both diagnosis and treatment selection in patients with neurocysticercosis.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate anti-inflammatory drugs in the medium- and long-term management of mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). The authors conducted a systematic review of the literature on the effectiveness of steroidal and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for mild and moderate cases of CTS. There were included only randomized, double-blind clinical trials. Six publications referring to five trials were included in the review. No study on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs met our inclusion criteria. Although neurophysiological studies have not shown great differences resulting from the application of corticosteroids, the symptomatic benefit provided by such drugs is clear. In the short term, local infiltration provides better results than systemic administration of corticosteroids. Over a 1-year period, however, this difference does not persist. Further double-blind randomized trials evaluating therapeutic efficacy for a longer follow-up period are required to provide stronger evidence for both steroidal and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories.
Content and appearance of the educational material for informal caregivers of children with hydrocephalus were successfully validated and considered suitable and user-friendly for health education.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.