Given the socio‐economic importance of cooperative firms and in the light of evidence that they are an effective option for competing in complex environments, an intensive examination of their organizational model is required. It is significant that some of the most consolidated worker cooperative organizations have focused on Market Orientation. The central purpose of this research is therefore to examine the influence of a set of internal antecedents of market orientation found in cooperatives. We shall then verify the possible benefits of market orientation on their business performance. The subject of this analysis will be the worker‐owned businesses that make up the Mondragon cooperative group, a global pioneer in democratic business practice.
A management model is a set of choices made by a firm's leadership regarding how objectives are defined, efforts are motivated, activities are coordinated and resources allocated, in short, regarding how the company will be run. Just as other types of businesses do, cooperatives need to create sustainable competitive advantages by adopting market-oriented management approaches. Mondragon Corporation achieves this in an alternative way relative to the conventional organizational and governance model, combining commitments to democratic principles, solidarity and competitiveness. Inspired by changes in the expectations of worker-members, new technological capabilities and the strategies of new competitors, Mondragon Corporation has designed a distinctive management model that can itself be a key driver of its competitiveness. The research presented here is focused on market orientation (MO), its relationships with a set of internal factors found in Mondragon cooperative enterprises, and their subsequent impact on business performance. Empirical results suggest that (1) Mondragon's management model increases organizational commitment, facilitating the adoption of MO and (2) a positive impact of MO on business performance. Practical and research implications are discussed. JEL classification: J54, M31
Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to address physical space management in customer service establishments and recognise the importance for such establishments to consider the experiences of customers in these spaces. For this purpose, the authors suggest constructs that enable service companies to focus appropriately on clients and to create and manage the experiences of customers in these facilities. Design/methodology/approach -The data for the analysis were gathered using a purposedesigned structured questionnaire that was administered by computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI). Quotas were established to ensure a reliable and accurate representation of the general Spanish population with current accounts at a retail branch of any bank. The data collected included 1,600 valid responses. Findings -Changes in the physical spaces of banking establishments must be determined by "how such establishments want to be perceived" by customers. This research indicates that current management is inadequate, as evidenced by the resoundingly negative customer evaluations. Consequently, banking establishments must be redesigned to ensure that clients are placed at the centre of such spaces. Practical implications -The authors' practical recommendation is that banks should introduce changes to the environmental and physical components of their facilities to generate a more positive response from their customers. Originality/value -The categorisation of the physical customer service space described in this paper will enable such spaces to be used to facilitate positive consumer experiences, to assist companies in achieving an improved client-oriented atmosphere.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.