To compare immunonutrition versus standard high calorie nutrition in patients undergoing elective colorectal resection within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program.Despite progress in recent years in the surgical management of patients with colorectal cancer (ERAS programs), postoperative complications are frequent. Nutritional supplements enriched with immunonutrients have recently been introduced into clinical practice. However, the extent to which the combination of ERAS protocols and immunonutrition benefits patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery is unknown.The SONVI study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial with 2 parallel treatment groups receiving either the study product (an immune-enhancing feed) or the control supplement (a hypercaloric hypernitrogenous supplement) for 7 days before colorectal resection and 5 days postoperatively.A total of 264 patients were randomized. At baseline, both groups were comparable in regards to age, sex, surgical risk, comorbidity, and analytical and nutritional parameters. The median length of the postoperative hospital stay was 5 days with no differences between the groups. A decrease in the total number of complications was observed in the immunonutrition group compared with the control group, primarily due to a significant decrease in infectious complications (23.8% vs. 10.7%, P = 0.0007). Of the infectious complications, wound infection differed significantly between the groups (16.4% vs. 5.7%, P = 0.0008). Other infectious complications were lower in the immunonutrition group but were not statistically significantly different.The implementation of ERAS protocols including immunonutrient-enriched supplements reduces the complications of patients undergoing colorectal resection.This study is registered with ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT02393976.

Outpatient treatment has demonstrated a safety and efficiency similar to inpatient treatment, producing an important reduction in expenses and medical resources.

PurposeERAS (enhanced recovery after surgery) programs have proven to reduce morbidity and hospital stay in colorectal surgery. However, the feasibility of these programs in elderly patients has been questioned. The aim of this study is to assess the implementation and outcomes of an ERAS program for colorectal cancer in elderly patients.MethodsThis is a multicenter observational study of a cohort of elderly patients undergoing colorectal surgery within an ERAS program. A total of 188 consecutive patients over 70 years who underwent elective colorectal surgery within an ERAS program at three institutions during a 2-year period were included. The compliance with the ERAS protocol interventions was measure. Complications were evaluated according to Clavien-Dindo classification. Data on length of stay and readmission rates were analyzed.ResultsEarly intake and early mobilization were the most successfully carried out interventions. There was a global compliance rate of 56 % of patients for whom compliance was achieved with all measured interventions. The median hospital length of stay was 6 days. Almost 60 % of patients had no complications, 24 % had minor complications while 13 % had major complications; of them, 8 % patients were reoperated. The readmission rate was 6.4 %.ConclusionsERAS after colorectal surgery in elderly patients presents as safe and feasible based on good reported outcomes of compliance rates, complications, readmissions, and needs for reoperation.

CRP and PCT are relevant markers for detecting postoperative AL after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Furthermore, they can ensure an early discharge with a low probability of AL when an ERAS program is performed.

Fistulotomy with sphincter reconstruction is an effective technique for the treatment of complex fistula-in-ano. Continence and anal manometry results were improved in incontinent patients and were not jeopardized in continent ones. Fistulotomy with sphincter reconstruction is an especially suitable technique for incontinent patients with recurrent fistulas.

This study is registered with ClinicalTrial.gov : NCT0239396.

Oncologic resection of rectal cancer has been reported to be associated with a significant rate of fecal incontinence (FI). The risk is greater in patients with a resection less than 6-8 cm from the anal verge [1]. Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) has been advocated as a safe and effective therapy for severe FI and shown to be associated with minimal morbidity [2]. In patients with FI after anterior resection (AR), SNS is has been used in few cases, with varying results [1,3].Between 2006 and 2009, four patients (one male, three female), with severe FI following neoadjuvant therapy and AR performed for rectal cancer, were treated in our hospital with SNS. The median age was 65.5 years (range 49-73 years). All patients had undergone chemoradiation before the operation. Total mesorectal excision and longitudinal coloplasty had been performed during the operation in all patients. The mean distance of the anastomosis from the anorectal ring was 5 cm (range 2-8 cm). The median history of FI following AR was 26.5 months (range 25-28 months). None presented tumor recurrence, local or distant. The incontinence status was classified according to the Wexner score [4].All patients were treated with conservative treatment, including drugs, constipating diet and biofeedback physiotherapy for 2 years. Before surgery, in all patients, anorectal manometry and endoanal ultrasonography were performed (Table 1). The percutaneous test stimulation was performed under general anesthesia. The response of S2-S4 was tested on both sides. If contraction of the anal sphincters could be obtained by SNS, percutaneous electrodes (Medtronic Ò 3050; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) were implanted. The patients were subsequently tested by SNS for a 4-week period. Patients who became candidates for permanent implantation based on an improvement of their continence received the permanent stimulation generator (INTERSTIM II, 3058; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) under general anesthesia. Differences were analyzed by the Wilcoxon test for paired data.All patients tested had contraction of the anal sphincters during the SNS 4-week test period. All patients had least a 50 % reduction in episodes of incontinence and were given a permanently implanted system. The Wexner score fell from a median score of 15.5 before SNS to 5.5 during permanent stimulation (p \ 0.005). There were no significant differences in sphincter pressures measured by anal manometry. The patients with associated urinary incontinence presented improvement in their symptoms. There was no cessation of clinical response during the follow-up, and no complications were observed.After colorectal or coloanal anastomoses at a lower location, about 30-60 % of patients develop anal dysfunction due to the loss of the rectum and internal sphincter. These patients develop clinical symptoms and signs, such as anterior resection syndrome, which includes stool frequency, urgency, fragmentation and soiling. These symptoms usually disappear approximately 1 year postoperatively [5]. Our results of SNS i...

No abstract