No abstract

No abstract

PurposeWorkforce diversity is considered one of the main challenges for human resource management in modern organizations. Despite its strategic importance, the majority of models in this field implicitly consider workforce as a generic and homogeneous category, and do not take into account cultural differences among employees. The aim of this paper is to present a systematic review of the literature on diversity among employees in strategic human resource management (SHRM). The objective of this conceptual analysis is to identify limitations in previous research and unresolved issues that could drive future research in this field.Design/methodology/approachTo develop this conceptual analysis, the paper reviews previous literature on SHRM, drawing on the distinction between the universalistic, contingent and configurational perspectives. Each of these approaches is explored, looking for the way in which they have treated workforce diversity and cross‐culturality.FindingsThe paper concludes that managing a heterogeneous workforce requires a holistic transformation of human resource strategies. Nevertheless, efforts to define cross‐cultural and diversity‐oriented models still remain undeveloped. Limitations of previous research in the diversity‐SHRM field are indentified in the paper.Research limitations/implicationsDrawing on the limitations of the treatment given to diversity in SHRM research, the paper identifies four research questions that still need to be addressed: deeper analysis of the concept of diversity, introduction of psychological processes mediating the diversity‐performance relationship, development of diversity oriented SHRM typologies and redefinition of performance indicators to measure the effects of diversity.Originality/valueThis paper proposes a theoretical model to illustrate present state of the art and future research lines in the fields of diversity, cross‐cultural management and SHRM.

In this paper we focus on the role of the human resources department, specifically in the area of labour relations, analysing how collective bargaining and collective agreement can be key mechanisms for the development of corporate social responsibility (CSR) through the incorporation of CSR practices that can currently be found in different instruments and documents of organizations (i.e., equality plans, codes of conduct, annual reports, etc.), but not in collective labour agreements. Results are shown for Santander Bank (SB) and Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria Bank (BBVA) because they are two of the main players in the Spanish financial sector. The results indicate that both groups are involved with the development of CSR policies; however, these practises are not spelled out in their collective agreements. It is argued that a CSR policy could be an incentive that would allow firms to attract, retain, and motivate their employees and gain a source of competitive differentiation thanks to the binding force of the collective agreement.