2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.redee.2015.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate social responsibility: Evolution through institutional and stakeholder perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
70
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
9
70
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, several authors such as Mahoney and Thorne () or Campbell, Johnston, Sefcik, and Soderstrom () argue that “executive compensation is likely to promote good social and environmental performance, which can enhance social and environmental legitimacy as well as organizational survival capabilities” (Haque, , p. 348). This approach to compensation policies from the point of view of sustainability can be framed within two disciplines that explain the internalization of social responsible behaviors by firms “in response to environmental pressures” (Barrena‐Martínez, López‐Fernández, & Romero‐Fernández, , p. 9): the stakeholder theory and the institutional theory. The stakeholder theory (Freeman, ) proposes that the role of a corporation “is to serve the interests of other non‐investing stakeholders as well” (Cai et al, , p. 162), creating value by anticipating the changes society demands (Barrena‐Martínez, López‐Fernández, Márquez‐Moreno, & Romero‐Fernández, ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, several authors such as Mahoney and Thorne () or Campbell, Johnston, Sefcik, and Soderstrom () argue that “executive compensation is likely to promote good social and environmental performance, which can enhance social and environmental legitimacy as well as organizational survival capabilities” (Haque, , p. 348). This approach to compensation policies from the point of view of sustainability can be framed within two disciplines that explain the internalization of social responsible behaviors by firms “in response to environmental pressures” (Barrena‐Martínez, López‐Fernández, & Romero‐Fernández, , p. 9): the stakeholder theory and the institutional theory. The stakeholder theory (Freeman, ) proposes that the role of a corporation “is to serve the interests of other non‐investing stakeholders as well” (Cai et al, , p. 162), creating value by anticipating the changes society demands (Barrena‐Martínez, López‐Fernández, Márquez‐Moreno, & Romero‐Fernández, ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cultural norms, religious beliefs or professional routines) because they cannot survive without a certain level of external social approval (e.g. Barrena‐Martínez et al, ; Jamali et al, ; cf. Frynas and Yamahaki, ).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Al encontrarse escasos estudios de la influencia que ejerce la rse sobre la imagen de marca afectiva y la reputación en las empresas, y en específico en el sector de autoservicios en México, se comprobó que se deben realizar investigaciones a mayor profundidad en el contexto de América Latina, y seguir explorando el entorno como recomienda Barrena et al (2016), ya que los resultados obtenidos son divergentes con otros países como España, Corea del Sur y Taiwán, siendo esta última una economía emergente como la mexicana. Regresando a América Latina y el Caribe, como menciona en el sector hotelero, su modelo solamente se constituye de dos variables de rse: la social y la ambiental, lo que concuerda con los resultados en el estudio, donde se rechazó por completo la influencia de la dimensión económica en la imagen y la reputación en el sector de autoservicios.…”
Section: Conclusionesunclassified