No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Study Type – Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Biochemical control from series in which radical prostatectomy is performed for patients with unfavorable prostate cancer and/or low dose external beam radiation therapy are given remains suboptimal. The treatment regimen of HDR brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy is a safe and very effective treatment for patients with high risk localized prostate cancer with excellent biochemical control and low toxicity. OBJECTIVE To investigate the long‐term oncological outcome, during the PSA era, of patients with prostate cancer who were treated using high‐dose‐rate (HDR) brachy therapy (BT) combined with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS From June 1998 to April 2007, 313 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with 46 Gy of EBRT to the pelvis with a HDR‐BT boost. The mean (median) follow‐up was 71 (68) months. Toxicity was reported according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Event, V.4. RESULTS The 10‐year actuarial biochemical control was 100% for patients with no high‐risk criteria, 88% for patients with two intermediate‐risk criteria, 91% with one high‐risk criterion and 79% for patients with two to three high‐risk criteria (P= 0.004). The 10‐year cancer‐specific survival was 97% (standard deviation ±1%). The multivariate Cox regression analyses identified, Gleason score and T stage as independent prognostic factors for biochemical failure. Gleason score was the only factor to significantly affect distant metastases. Grade ≥3 late toxicity was not detected. CONCLUSION The 10‐year results confirm the feasibility and effectiveness of EBRT with conformal HDR‐BT boost for patients with localised prostate cancer.

Study Type – Therapy (case series)
Level of Evidence 4 OBJECTIVE To report our analysis of the oncological outcome, side‐effects and complications after 125I‐brachytherapy, based on 10 years of experience, as low dose‐rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy is an accepted, effective and safe therapy for localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between April 1999 and December 2006, 734 consecutive patients were treated with clinically localized prostate cancer with a follow‐up of ≥30 months. No patients received external beam radiotherapy and 43% received hormonal therapy before brachytherapy; this therapy was given for 3–4 months. All patients had LDR prostate brachytherapy administered by one radiation oncologist. Biochemical failure was defined according to the ‘Phoenix consensus’. RESULTS The median follow‐up for the 734 patients was 55 months; 26 had a clinical relapse and 11 died from prostate cancer; 20 patients died from other illnesses. The 10‐year actuarial biochemical control was 92%, 84% and 65%, respectively (P < 0.001) for the low‐, intermediate‐ and high‐risk groups. Multivariate Cox regression analyses identified Gleason score and prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) level as independent prognostic factors for biochemical failure. The actuarial biochemical control with Gleason score was 88%, 76% and 67% for patients with a Gleason score of ≤6, 7 and >7, respectively (P < 0.001). The biochemical control was 90%, 80% and 42% for patients with a PSA level of ≤10, 10.1–20 and >20 ng/mL, respectively (P < 0.001). No patients reported incontinence after treatment. There was acute urinary retention in 22 (2.9%) patients. Logistic regression showed that the most significant factors correlating with the probability of catheterization were the pretreatment prostate volume and hormonal therapy. CONCLUSIONS The excellent long‐term results and low morbidity, and the many advantages of prostate brachytherapy over other treatments, show that brachytherapy is an effective treatment for clinically organ‐confined prostate cancer.

PurposeTo evaluate the feasibility of acute and chronic toxicity in patients suitable for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) in a single 18 Gy fraction with multicatheter high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy, as well as cosmetic and oncological outcomes.Material and methodsBetween September 2014 and March 2016, twenty consecutive patients with low-risk invasive and ductal carcinoma in situ were treated with interstitial multicatheter HDR brachytherapy in a single 18 Gy fraction.ResultsMedian age was 63.5 years (range, 51-79). Acute toxicity was observed in seven patients, while the pain during following days and hematoma were seen in four patients. With a median follow-up of 24 months, late toxicity was found in one patient with fat necrosis g2 and fibrosis g2 in another patient. The overall survival (OS) and locoregional control (LC) was 100%. Disease-free survival (DFS) and distant control was 95%. Good to excellent cosmetic outcomes were noted in 80% of patients and fair in 4 patients (20%).ConclusionsThis is the first report in the medical literature that focuses on feasibility and acute and chronic toxicity, with a median follow-up of 24 months (range, 20-40). The protocol is viable and convenient. However, a longer follow-up is needed to know chronic toxicity and oncologic outcomes.