Validation of the Spanish version of the breast Q reduction and mastopexy module xxxxBackground: The Breast Q Reduction and Mastopexy Module evaluate breast related quality of life from the perspective of the patients. Body self-image, social performance, sexuality and physical symptoms are assessed. Aim: To translate the Breast Q Reduction and Mastopexy Module to Spanish and validate the translated version to be used in Chile. Material and Methods: The linguistic validation guidelines of the MAPI/TRUST Research institute were used and the survey was applied to six patients aged 29 ± 6 years with 14 ± 2 years of studies. The internal stability of the test was assessed using Cronbach alpha. Results: The mean body mass index of the patients was 25 ± 1 kg/m
Validation of the spanish version of the Rhinoplasty Outcome EvaluationBackground: The Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation is a questionnaire that assesses, form the point of view of the patient, the functional and cosmetic outcome of rhinoplasty. It has six items for esthetic and functional domains, using Likert type questions with five alternatives. The scale ranges from 6 that is the worst outcome to 30, the best. Aim: To translate and validate the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation, to be used in Chile. Material and Methods: The linguistic validation guidelines of the MAPI/TRUST Research Institute were used. The instrument was translated from English to Spanish, counter translated and applied to a pilot sample of five patients. The internal stability was assessed using Cronbach alpha. Results: The five female patients in whom the questionnaire was applied were aged 22 ± 4 years, had 15 ± 2 years of studies and their body mass index was 23 ± 4 kg/m 2 . Cronbach alpha was 84%. The scale changed from 10 points in the preoperative period to 17 points in the postoperative period. Conclusions: The Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation is a valid and reliable questionnaire to evaluate the results of rhinoplasty
Development of an instrument to evaluate the results of plastic surgery from the perspective of the patient Background: Body remodeling surgical procedures requires an assessment from the client's point of view in terms of esthetic satisfaction. Aim: To develop an instrument of assess body remodeling surgical results from the point of view of the patient. Material and Methods: A literature search for assessment methods was carried out. Posteriorly, in depth interviews and focus groups with plastic surgeons and patients subjected to plastic surgery procedures were performed. With this information, a conceptual framework was established to devise the instrument. Results: Sixteen patients and five plastic surgeons participated in the interviews and focus groups. The domains included in the conceptual framework were outfit and body image, affective and sexual life, self-image and esteem, social relationships and physical symptoms. Conclusions: The conceptual framework for the instrument is ready and the psychometric evaluation is the next step in its development.
development and testing of an instrument to assess body shape related quality of life background: The assessment of patient satisfaction and quality of life after body remodeling surgery is important. aim: To develop and assess a self-report instrument to evaluate the results of bariatric and body remodeling surgery. material and methods: A three phase methodology was used. In phase 1, literature was reviewed and in depth interviews to patients were carried out, creating a preliminary instrument that was applied to 1,340 patients in phase 2. In phase 3, the final assessment of the instrument was performed, applying it to 34 patients. The psychometric properties of the in instrument were evaluated. results: The instrument has four domains (satisfaction with abdomen, sexual life, self-esteem and social life and psychological symptoms) and 20 items. Its score ranges from 20 (worst) to 100 (better). Response rate was 100%, internal reliability was 93% and test-re test concordance was 98%. Body shape related quality of life was significantly higher in men than in women. It decreases with age and with increasing body mass index. Patients subjected to bariatric surgery had lower scores than patients subjected to esthetic surgery. In the postoperative period, the score improved by 21.9 ± 16.9 points. conclusions: The instrument developed can reliably measure quality of life associated with body shape.key words: quality of life, body shape, bariatric surgery.
Evaluation of the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation among Chilean participants Background: The Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) is an instrument to assess the cosmetic and functional aspects of the nose from the patient's perspective. Its construct validity in Chilean subjects has been published previously. Aim: To compare the ROE scores in different groups of participants. Material and Methods: The questionnaire was applied to patients waiting for a rhinoplasty, patients hospitalized for other causes and medical students. Results: The overall reliability of the scale was 84.8%. Significant differences between groups in the total scores of four out of six items were observed. Conclusions: The Spanish version of the ROE is adequate to evaluate the satisfaction with nasal appearance and function among Chilean individuals.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.