No abstract

In this work, an experimental comparison between five different techniques to measure interfacial tension between molten polymers is presented. The five techniques include two equilibrium methods: the pendant drop (PD) and the sessile drop (SD): two dynamic methods: the breaking thread (BT) and imbedded fiber retraction (IF): and a rheological method based on linear viscoelastic measurements of the blend (RM). The polymer pairs studied were polystyrene/polypropylene (PS/PP): and PP/high density polyethylene (PP/HDPE). It was possible to determine the interfacial tension between PP/PS with all the methods tested and the results corroborated within 20%. However, the interfacial tension between PP and HDPE could be evaluated only using rheological methods because of a too-small difference of index of refraction between both polymers. The experimental precision increased in the following order: R M < SD < E5T < IF < PD. The rheological method had the advantage of being simpler and faster than dynamic and equilibrium methods. However, when using the rheological method, care should be taken because the results obtained may depend upon the concentration of the blend used for the measurements. It was observed that the pendant drop and breaking thread methods cannot be used for polymers with high viscosity (above 5 X lo5 Pa.s).

No abstract

In this work, the linear viscoelastic behavior of PP/PS and PP/HDPE blends modified with SEBS and EPDM, respectively, was studied. Small amplitude oscillatory shear measurements were carried out at different temperatures, ranging from 190°C to 240°C. The storage (G') and loss (G") moduli curves obtained were horizontally shifted and curves of angle delta (δ) (δ = atan (G"/G')) as a function of complex shear modulus (G*), known as van Gurp plots, were obtained at several temperatures, to test the applicability of time‐temperature superposition principle (TTS) to these blends. The results showed that successful application of TTS depends on the flow energy of activation and horizontal shift factors of the individual components of the blend, on the interfacial properties of the blend and on the concentration of compatibilizer added to the blend. TTS application failed for PP/PS blend, but held for PP/HDPE blend. Addition of SEBS to PP/PS blends promoted successful TTS application at specific concentrations that corresponded to interfacial saturation of the dispersed phase. Addition of EPDM did not imply sensitive change on TTS application for the PP/HDPE blends.

No abstract