Rabbit oral papillomavirus (ROPV) causes benign and spontaneously regressing oral lesions in rabbits, and is a useful model of disease associated with low-risk human papillomavirus types. Here we have adapted the ROPV system to study papillomavirus latency. Following lesion regression, ROPV DNA persists at the majority of regressed sites at levels substantially lower than those found in productive papillomas. Spliced viral transcripts were also detected. ROPV persistence in the absence of disease could be demonstrated for a year following infection and lesion-regression. This was not associated with completion of the virus life-cycle or new virion production, indicating that ROPV persists in a latent state. Using novel laser capture microdissection techniques, we could show that the site of latency is a subset of basal epithelial cells at sites of previous experimental infection. We hypothesize that these cells are epithelial stem cells and that reactivation of latency may be a source of recurrent disease.

∧ E4 protein caused an almost total inhibition of keratin dynamics, despite the phosphorylation of keratin 18 at serine 33, which normally leads to 14-3-3-mediated keratin solubilization. Mutant 16E1 ∧ E4 proteins which lack the LLKLL motif, or which have lost amino acids from their C termini, and which were compromised in the ability to associate with keratins did not disturb normal keratin dynamics. 16E1 ∧ E4 was found to exist as dimers and hexamers, whereas a C-terminal deletion mutant (16E1 ∧ E4⌬87-92) existed as monomers and formed multimeric structures only poorly. Considered together, our results suggest that by associating with keratins through its N terminus, and by associating with itself through its C terminus, 16E1 ∧ E4 may act as a keratin cross-linker and prevent the movement of keratins between the soluble and insoluble compartments. The increase in avidity associated with multimeric binding may contribute to the ability of 16E1 ∧ E4 to sequester its cellular targets in the cytoplasm.Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are small double-stranded DNA viruses of ϳ8,000 bp. They infect stratified epithelium and produce lesions that range in severity from benign warts to invasive carcinomas (24). HPV DNA has been detected in Ͼ99.7% of cervical cancers, with HPV16 occurring most frequently (28,29,44). HPV16 is a high-risk HPV type which causes cervical lesions that can progress to high-grade neoplasia and cancer (43).The life cycle of HPVs is closely linked to the differentiation status of the host epithelium. After infecting basal cells through a wound, the viral genome maintains itself episomally at a low copy number (5). As the infected cell migrates toward the epithelial surface and undergoes terminal differentiation, the productive stages of the viral life cycle are triggered. Vegetative viral DNA replication is followed by the expression of capsid proteins and the assembly of infectious virions in the superficial cell layers (24).The HPV16 E1 ∧ E4 protein is expressed in abundance during the late stages of the virus life cycle in the upper layer of the epithelium and coincides with the onset of viral genome amplification (12,26,35). Although the precise role of 16E1 ∧ E4 is unclear, previous work has revealed that 16E1 ∧ E4 can induce cell cycle arrest in G 2 (7), can bind to a DEAD box RNA helicase (E4-DBP) (9), and, when expressed in cultured epithelial cells, can interact with keratins and cause the reorganization of the keratin intermediate-filament network (11). Although the mechanism by which 16E1 ∧ E4 mediates keratin filament reorganization is not understood, immunofluorescence staining has shown the LLKLL motif located close to the N terminus to be necessary for filament colocalization and has shown the C terminus to be necessary for filament collapse.Keratins are major structural proteins in epithelial cells and form the cytoplasmic network of intermediate filaments (17). They contain at least 20 members, called keratin 1 (K1) to K20, which are divided into two types according to the sequence...

At mucosal sites, papillomavirus genomes can persist in the epithelial basal layer following immune-mediated regression. Subsequent T-cell depletion stimulates a 3- to 5-log increase in the viral copy number, to levels associated with productive infection. Reappearance of microlesions was rare within the short time frame of our experiments but was observed in one instance. Our studies provide direct evidence that immunosuppression can trigger the reactivation of latent papillomavirus genomes, as previously proposed in humans.

The minimal DNA-binding domains of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae transcription factors Mbp1 and Swi4 have been identified and their DNA binding properties have been investigated by a combination of methods. An approximately 100 residue region of sequence homology at the N-termini of Mbp1 and Swi4 is necessary but not sufficient for full DNA binding activity. Unexpectedly, nonconserved residues C-terminal to the core domain are essential for DNA binding. Proteolysis of Mbp1 and Swi4 DNA-protein complexes has revealed the extent of these sequences, and C-terminally extended molecules with substantially enhanced DNA binding activity compared to the core domains alone have been produced. The extended Mbp1 and Swi4 proteins bind to their cognate sites with similar affinity [K(A) approximately (1-4) x 10(6) M(-)(1)] and with a 1:1 stoichiometry. However, alanine substitution of two lysine residues (116 and 122) within the C-terminal extension (tail) of Mbp1 considerably reduces the apparent affinity for an MCB (MluI cell-cycle box) containing oligonucleotide. Both Mbp1 and Swi4 are specific for their cognate sites with respect to nonspecific DNA but exhibit similar affinities for the SCB (Swi4/Swi6 cell-cycle box) and MCB consensus elements. Circular dichroism and (1)H NMR spectroscopy reveal that complex formation results in substantial perturbations of base stacking interactions upon DNA binding. These are localized to a central 5'-d(C-A/G-CG)-3' region common to both MCB and SCB sequences consistent with the observed pattern of specificity. Changes in the backbone amide proton and nitrogen chemical shifts upon DNA binding have enabled us to experimentally define a DNA-binding surface on the core N-terminal domain of Mbp1 that is associated with a putative winged helix-turn-helix motif. Furthermore, significant chemical shift differences occur within the C-terminal tail of Mbp1, supporting the notion of two structurally distinct DNA-binding regions within these proteins.

The secreted proteins intestinal trefoil factor (ITF, 59 residues), pS2 (60 residues), and spasmolytic polypeptide (SP, 106 residues) form a small family of trefoil domain-containing mammalian cell motility factors, which are essential for the maintenance of all mucous-coated epithelial surfaces. We have used 1H NMR spectroscopy to determine the high-resolution structure of human ITF, which has allowed detailed structural comparisons with the other trefoil cell motility factors. The conformation of residues 10-53 of hITF is determined to high precision, but the structure of the N- and C-terrminal residues is poorly defined by the NMR data, which is probably indicative of significant mobility. The core of the trefoil domain in hITF consists of a two-stranded antiparallel beta-sheet (Cys 36 to Asp 39 and Trp 47 to Lys 50), which is capped by an irregular loop and forms a central hairpin (loop 3). The beta-sheet is preceded by a short alpha-helix (Lys 29 to Arg 34), with the majority of the remainder of the domain contained in two loops formed from His 25 to Pro 28 (loop 2) and Ala 12 to Arg 18 (loop 1), which lie on either side of the central hairpin. The region formed by the surface of loop 2, the cleft between loop 2 and loop 3, and the adjacent face of loop 3 has previously been proposed to form the functional site of trefoil domains. Detailed comparisons of the backbone conformations and surface features of the family of trefoil cell motility factors (porcine SP, pS2, and hITF) have identified significant structural and electrostatic differences in the loop 2/loop 3 regions, which suggest that each trefoil protein has a specific target or group of target molecules.