No abstract

BackgroundIn accordance with the People’s Republic of China’s (China) National Health Reform Plan of 2009, two of the nation’s leading hospitals, located in Beijing, have implemented electronic medical record (EMR) systems from different vendors.To inform future EMR adoption and policy in China, as well as informatics research in the US, this study compared the United State’s Hospital Meaningful Use (MU) Objectives (phase 1) objectives to the EMR functionality of two early hospital EMR adopters in China.MethodsAt both hospitals, the researchers observed a physician using the EMR and noted MU functionality that was seen and functionality that was not seen yet was available in the EMR. The information technology department was asked about the availability of functionality neither observed nor known to the physician.Results and conclusionsApproximately half the MU objectives were available in each EMR. Some differences between the EMRs in the study and MU objectives were attributed to operational differences between the health systems and the cultures in the two countries.

No abstract

Electronic health records (EHRs), intended to improve the clinical process, are understudied in home care. The researchers assessed clinician satisfaction, informed by workflow and patient outcomes, to identify EHR adoption challenges. The mixed methods study setting was a Philadelphia agency with 137 clinicians. Adoption challenges included: (a) hardware problems coupled with lack of field support; (b) inadequate training; and (c) mismatch of EHR usability/functionality and workflow resulting in decreased efficiency. Adoption facilitators were support for team communication and improved clinical data timeliness. Opportunities for improved adoption included sharing with front-line clinicians EHR data related to patient care and health outcomes.

A new survey instrument was developed and validated to measure clinician (nurse) satisfaction with electronic health record impact on clinical process. The Health Information Technology Reference-Based Evaluation Framework guided the selection of evaluation dimensions for the survey. Survey questions were gathered from existing health information technology satisfaction surveys that reflected individual evaluation concepts, such as efficiency or benefits. Decisions about data-gathering methods (e.g., item selection) were made based on reviews of literature and surveys of clinician satisfaction with health information technology and expert input. Preliminary instrument validation was accomplished using qualitative and statistical analysis of five repeated sets of responses from clinicians at the pilot site and field administrations repeated twice at electronic health record implementation and paper-based comparison sites and by analyzing convergent evidence from observations and interviews. Reliability was assessed on one sample: 30 graduate nursing students at the single pilot site. Validity was assessed on three separate samples: (1) graduate nursing students (n = 30), (2) field test at a site with electronic health record (n = 39 participants), and (3) field test at a paper-based site (n = 17). The implementation and comparison sites are Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly that provide managed day care for frail elderly. Survey responses were assessed for test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and content and construct validity. The instrument design enables its administration before and after electronic health record implementation. Work to date suggests the instrument is reliable and valid; it is offered to electronic health record evaluators for further testing and application.

The EPIKE approach can be used successfully to identify the needs of adolescents across the digital divide to inform the design and development of mHealth apps.

This multimethod study measured the impact of an electronic health record (EHR) on clinician satisfaction with clinical process. Subjects were 39 clinicians at a Program of All-inclusive Care for Elders (PACE) site in Philadelphia utilizing an EHR. Methods included the evidence-based evaluation framework, Health Information Technology Research-Based Evaluation Framework, which guided assessment of clinician satisfaction with surveys, observations, follow-up interviews, and actual EHR use at two points in time. Mixed-methods analysis of findings provided context for interpretation and improved validity. The study found that clinicians were satisfied with the EHR; however, satisfaction declined between time periods. Use of EHR was universal and wide and was differentiated by clinical role. Between time periods, EHR use increased in volume, with increased timeliness and decreased efficiency. As the first EHR evaluation at a PACE site from the perspective of clinicians who use the system, this study provides insights into EHR use in the care of older people in community-based healthcare settings.

Objective Patient transitions into home health care (HHC) often occur without the transfer of information needed for critical clinical decisions and the plan of care. Owing to a lack of universally implemented standards, there is wide variation in information transfer. We sought to characterize missing information at HHC admission. Materials and Methods We conducted a mixed methods study with 3 diverse HHC agencies. Focus groups with nurses at each agency identified what information supports patient care decisions at admission. Thirty-six in-home admissions with associated documentation review determined the available information. To inform information standards development for the HHC admission process, we compared the types of information desired and available to an international standard for transitions in care information, the Continuity of Care Document (CCD) enhanced with Office of the National Coordinator for Healthcare Information Technology summary terms (CCD/S). Results Three-quarters of the items from the focus groups mapped to the CCD/S. Regarding available information at admission, no observation included all CCD/S data items. While medication information was needed and often available for 4 important decisions, concepts related to patient medication self-management appeared in neither the CCD/S nor the admission documentation. Discussion The CCD/S mostly met HHC nurses’ information needs and is recommended to begin to fill the current information gap. Electronic health record recommendations include use of a data standard: the CCD or the proposed, more parsimonious U.S. Core Data for Interoperability. Conclusions Referral source and HHC agency adoption of data standards is recommended to support structured, consistent data and information sharing.