Human obesity is associated with insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, and a predisposition to hypertension and vascular disease, the origin of which may lie in impairment of endothelial function. We tested the effects of the thiazolidinedione rosiglitazone on blood pressure and endothelial function in insulin-resistant fatty Zucker rats, which display hypertension and abnormal endothelial cell function. We studied fatty Zucker rats given rosiglitazone maleate (50 micromol/kg diet; n = 8) for 9-12 weeks (treated fatty), untreated fatty rats (n = 8), and lean rats (n = 8) given diet alone. At the end of the study, systolic blood pressure was significantly higher in untreated fatty (147 +/- 5 mmHg) than in lean rats (125 +/- 2 mmHg; P < 0.05), but rosiglitazone treatment prevented the development of hypertension in fatty rats (123 +/- 1 mmHg). Fasting hyperinsulinemia in untreated fatty rats (28.7 +/- 6.0 ng/ml) was significantly lowered by rosiglitazone (7.0 +/- 1.4 ng/ml; P < 0.05 vs. untreated fatty), but remained significantly higher than the levels seen in lean rats (1.5 +/- 0.4 ng/ml; P < 0.01). Mesenteric arteries were studied in a myograph. Maximal acetylcholine chloride (1.1 micromol/l)-induced relaxation of norepinephrine hydrochloride (NE)-induced constriction was impaired in untreated fatty (62.4 +/- 3.4%) vs. lean (74.3 +/- 3.5%; P = 0.01) rats; this defect was partially prevented by rosiglitazone (66.5 +/- 3.0%; P = 0.01 vs. untreated fatty). Insulin (50 mU/l) significantly attenuated the contractile response to NE in lean rats (14.7 +/- 3.3%; P = 0.02); this vasodilator effect of insulin was absent in untreated fatty rats at concentrations of 50-5,000 mU/l, but was partially restored by rosiglitazone (9.7 +/- 2.5% attenuation; P = 0.02 vs. no insulin). Thus, rosiglitazone prevents the development of hypertension and partially protects against impaired endothelial function associated with insulin resistance. These latter effects may contribute to the drug's antihypertensive properties.

BRL 49653 (rosiglitazone) and troglitazone are thiazolidinedione insulin-sensitizing agents, which are undergoing clinical evaluation as treatments for NIDDM. Potential side effects of thiazolidinediones include edema and hemodilution. Although the underlying mechanisms are presently unclear, animal and human studies have demonstrated a vasodilator action of troglitazone, which could in theory cause fluid retention. This in vitro study compared the direct vasodilator effects of troglitazone and BRL 49653 in small arteries (n = 44) from human subcutaneous fat. In arterial rings with a functioning endothelium and preconstricted with norepinephrine (NE; 6 micromol/l), troglitazone (n = 22 vessels), but not BRL 49653 (1-100 micromol/l), caused a concentration-related relaxation (69.4 +/- 5.2% at 100 micromol/l; P < 0.01). In the presence of indomethacin (IM; 10 micromol/l; n = 12), this vasorelaxant effect of troglitazone was abolished (P < 0.01 vs. troglitazone alone) and replaced by enhanced vasoconstriction (58.5 +/- 39.5% over the NE baseline) similar in magnitude to that produced by troglitazone vehicle (ethanol) alone (n = 16; NS vs. ethanol vehicle). By contrast, BRL 49653 (100 micromol/l; n = 22) and an equivalent volume of ethanol alone (n = 12) caused similar degrees of vasoconstriction (18.7 +/- 14.6 and 22.5 +/- 8.0%, respectively; NS). In the presence of IM (10 micromol/l; n = 10), the vasoconstrictor effect of BRL 49653 was enhanced (41.5 +/- 14.4%), although not significantly (NS vs. BRL 49653 alone or ethanol alone). Additional studies in Wistar rat arteries showed a similar vasodilator effect of troglitazone that was not inhibited by L-NAME (100 micromol/l). The alpha-tocopherol moiety alone had no vasorelaxant effect at concentrations up to 300 micromol/l. Thus, in human arterial resistance vessels in vitro, BRL 49653 does not possess the direct, IM-sensitive vasorelaxant action of troglitazone. This vasodilation could, in theory, permit transmission of systemic pressure to the capillary bed.

No abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether a short period (5 days) of night-shift work affected the pituitary-adrenal responses to CRH. Ten nurses (8 female and 2 male; age 28.1 +/- 1.7 yr: mean +/- SEM) working at the Royal Liverpool University Hospital, and who regularly undertook periods of night and day shift work were enrolled. Measurements were made of basal ACTH and cortisol concentrations, and their responses to iv ovine CRH (1 microgram.kg-1). Basal ACTH concentrations were higher during the night shift than during the day shift (12.9 +/- 5.1 pmol.L-1 vs. 4.7 +/- 1.2 pmol.L-1, P < 0.01) whereas cortisol concentrations were lower (551 +/- 48 nmol.L - 1 vs. 871 +/- 132 nmol.L - 1, P < 0.01). After CRH injection, ACTH concentrations remained consistently higher during the night shift, but the integrated increase in ACTH concentration was lower (P < 0.05) than during the day shift. Conversely, the increase in cortisol concentration was greater during the night shift than the day shift (283 +/- 53 nmol.L-1 vs. 134 +/- 41 nmol.L-1, P < 0.05). We conclude that the pituitary-adrenal responses to CRH are markedly disrupted after only 5 days of nighttime work. These abnormalities mimic those previously observed in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Neuroendocrine abnormalities reported to be characteristic of chronic fatigue syndrome may be merely the consequence of disrupted sleep and social routine.

No abstract