Screening for variants in TPMT did not reduce the proportions of patients with hematologic ADRs during thiopurine treatment for IBD. However, there was a 10-fold reduction in hematologic ADRs among variant carriers who were identified and received a dose reduction, compared with variant carriers who did not, without differences in treatment efficacy. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00521950.

Background and aims The COVID-19 risk and disease course in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients remains uncertain. Therefore, we aimed to assess the clinical presentation, disease course and outcomes of COVID-19 in IBD patients. Second, we determined COVID-19 incidences in IBD patients and compared this with the general population. Methods We conducted a multicenter, nationwide IBD cohort study in the Netherlands and identified patients with COVID-19. First, we assessed the COVID-19 disease course and outcomes. Second, we compared COVID-19 incidences between our IBD study cohort and the general Dutch population. Results We established an IBD cohort of 34,763 patients. COVID-19 was diagnosed in 100/34,763 patients (0.29%). 20/100 patients (20%) had severe COVID-19 defined as admission to the intensive care unit, mechanical ventilation, and/or death. Hospitalization occurred in 59/100 (59.0%) patients and 13/100 (13.0%) died. All patients who deceased had comorbidities and all but one were > 65 years. In line, we identified > 1 comorbidity as an independent risk factor for hospitalization (OR 4.20, 95% CI 1.58-11.17, p = 0.004). Incidences of COVID-19 between the IBD study cohort and the general population were comparable (287.6 (95% CI 236.6-349.7) versus 333.0 (95% CI 329.3-336.7) per 100,000 patients, respectively; p = 0.15). Conclusions Of 100 cases with IBD and COVID-19, 20% developed severe COVID-19, 59% was hospitalized and 13% died. A comparable COVID-19 risk was found between the IBD cohort (100/34,763 = 0.29%) and the general Dutch population. The presence of > 1 comorbidities was an independent risk factor for hospitalization due to COVID-19.

No abstract

Summary Background Infliximab biosimilars have become available for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, data showing long‐term safety and effectiveness of biosimilars in IBD patients are limited. Aim To study prospectively the switch from infliximab innovator to biosimilar in an IBD cohort with 12 months follow‐up to evaluate safety and effectiveness. Methods Adult IBD patients from two hospitals treated with infliximab innovator (Remicade; Janssen Biotech,  Horsham ,  Pennsylvania, USA) were switched to infliximab biosimilar (Inflectra; Hospira, Lake Forest, Illinois, USA) as part of routine care, but in a controlled setting. Blood samples were taken just before the first, second, fourth and seventh infusion of biosimilar. Infliximab trough levels, antibodies‐to‐infliximab (ATI), CRP and ESR were measured and disease activity scores were calculated. Results Our cohort consisted of 133 IBD patients (64% CD, 36% UC). Before switching we found widely varying infliximab levels (median 3.5 μg/mL). ATI were detected in eight patients (6%). Most patients were in remission or had mild disease (CD: 82% UC: 90%). After switching to biosimilar, 35 patients (26%) discontinued therapy within 12 months, mostly due to subjective higher disease activity (9%) and adverse events (AE, 9.8%). AE included general malaise/fatigue (n = 7), arthralgia (n = 2), skin problems (n = 2) and infusion reactions (n = 2). No differences in IFX levels, CRP, and disease activity scores were found between the four time points (P ≥ .0917). Conclusions We found no differences in drug levels and disease activity between infliximab innovator and biosimilar in our IBD cohort, indicating that biosimilars are safe and effective. The high proportions of discontinuers were mostly due to elective withdrawal or subjective disease worsening.

No abstract

No abstract

Coffee does not affect gastric emptying of a liquid meal or small bowel transit.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: It is currently unclear whether reported changes in the gut microbiome are cause or consequence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Therefore, we studied the gut microbiome of IBD-discordant and -concordant twin pairs, which offers the unique opportunity to assess individuals at increased risk of developing IBD, namely healthy cotwins from IBDdiscordant twin pairs. METHODS: Fecal samples were obtained from 99 twins (belonging to 51 twin pairs), 495 healthy age-, sex-, and body mass index-matched controls, and 99 unrelated patients with IBD. Whole-genome metagenomic shotgun sequencing was performed. Taxonomic and functional (pathways) composition was compared among healthy cotwins, IBD-twins, unrelated patients with IBD, and healthy controls with multivariable (ie, adjusted for potential confounding) generalized linear models.RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in the relative abundance of species and pathways between healthy cotwins and their IBD-twins (false discovery rate <0.10). Compared with healthy controls, 13, 19, and 18 species, and 78, 105, and 153 pathways were found to be differentially abundant in healthy cotwins, IBD-twins, and unrelated patients with IBD, respectively (false discovery rate <0.10). Of these, 8 (42.1%) of 19 and 1 (5.6%) of 18 species, and 37 (35.2%) of 105 and 30 (19.6%) of 153 pathways overlapped between healthy cotwins and IBDtwins, and healthy cotwins and unrelated patients with IBD, respectively. Many of the shared species and pathways have previously been associated with IBD. The shared pathways include potentially inflammation-related pathways, for example, an increase in propionate degradation and L-arginine degradation