The Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) has an ongoing effort to create evidence-based practice guidelines for orthopaedic physical therapy management of patients with musculoskeletal impairments described in the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). The purpose of these revised clinical practice guidelines is to review recent peer-reviewed literature and make recommendations related to nonarthritic heel pain.

The presence of disc extrusion and/or ipsilateral, severe nerve compression at one or multiple sites is strongly associated with distal leg pain. Mild to moderate nerve compression, disc degeneration or bulging, and central spinal stenosis are not significantly associated with specific pain patterns. Although segmental distributions of pain can be determined reliably from pain drawings, this finding alone is of little use in predicting lumbar impairment. The self-report of lower extremity weakness or dysesthesia is not significantly related to any specific lumbar impairments. [Key words: back pain, diagnosis, magnetic resonance imaging, nerve compression, pain drawing, pathology]

Determining the difference in the length of an individual's legs is often an important component of a musculoskeletal examination. Although measurements are easily obtained with a tape measure, the validity of these measurements is not known. The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of determinations of leg-length differences (LLDs) obtained by use of a specified tape measure method (TMM). Leg-length differences using the TMM and a radiographic technique were determined for 10 subjects who were candidates for clinical leg-length measurements and for 9 healthy control subjects. Validity of the TMM measurements was determined by assessing the degree of agreement between TMM-obtained LLDs and those obtained by the radiographic method. Validity estimates as determined by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were .770 for patients, .359 for healthy subjects, and .683 for all subjects. When the means of the two values obtained by use of the TMM were compared with the radiographic measurements, the ICCs were .852 for the patient group, .637 for the healthy subjects, and .793 for all subjects. This study suggests that TMM-derived LLD measurements are valid indicators of leg-length inequality and that the estimates of validity are improved by using the average of two determinations rather than a single determination.

Clinical prediction rules use quantitative methods to build upon the body of literature and expert opinion and can provide quick and inexpensive estimates of probability. Clinical prediction rules can be of great value to assist clinical decision making but should not be used indiscriminately. They are not a replacement for clinical judgment and should complement rather than supplant clinical opinion and intuition. The development of valid clinical prediction rules should be a goal of physiotherapy research. Specific areas in need of attention include deriving and validating clinical prediction rules to screen patients for potentially serious conditions for which current tests lack adequate diagnostic accuracy or have unacceptable cost and risk, and to assist in classification of patients for treatments that are likely to result in substantially different outcomes in heterogeneous groups of patients.

Background and Purpose. Patient satisfaction with physical therapy is used as an outcome variable. The purpose of this study was to develop and test an instrument used to determine which variables are associated with the satisfaction of patients receiving outpatient physical therapy. Subjects. During the pilot study, 191 patients participated, and 1,868 patients then participated in the main phase of this work. Methods. Using a survey instrument developed by the authors, subjects responded to global questions concerning overall satisfaction with physical therapy. Content validation of the instrument was investigated using item correlation, principal components analysis, and factor analysis. Reliability was measured using the standard error of measurement. Concurrent validity was investigated by correlating summary scores of the final survey instrument with global measures of satisfaction. Results. Reliability was best for a 10-item questionnaire. Patient satisfaction was most associated with items that reflected a high-quality interaction with the therapist (eg, time, adequate explanations and instructions to patients). Environmental factors such as clinic location, parking, time spent waiting for the therapist, and type of equipment used were not strongly correlated with overall satisfaction with care. Discussion and Conclusion. Because the time the therapist spent with patients and the behavior of the therapists are important for patient satisfaction, emphasis on cost-cutting, high patient volume, and the use of “care extenders” may jeopardize satisfaction.

Reducing rotator cuff stiffness may be beneficial in improving the ROM deficits associated with injury risk in overhead athletes.

Physical therapists must screen all individuals who have experienced a potential concussive event and document the presence or absence of symptoms, impairments, and functional limitations that may relate to a concussive event. Screening for Indicators of Emergency ConditionsA Physical therapists must screen patients who have experienced a recent potential concussive event for signs of medical emergency or severe pathology (eg, more serious brain injury, medical conditions, or cervical spine injury) that warrant further evaluation by other health care providers. Referral for further evaluation should be made as indicated (FIGURE 1). Differential DiagnosisA Physical therapists must evaluate for potential signs and symptoms of an undiagnosed concussion in patients who have experienced a concussive event but have not been diagnosed with concussion. Evaluation should include triangulation of information from patient/family/witness reports, the patient's past medical history, physical observation/examination, and the use of an age-appropriate symptom scale/checklist (see FIGURE 1 for diagnostic criteria).

Patients with recurrent or persistent low back pain (LBP) and disability represent a formidable challenge to physical therapists. Classic models of disease and pain mechanisms do not adequately explain the commonly observed discrepancies between the extent of pathology and reported pain, or the level of pain and disability. Research over the past decade that considers the interactive role of biological, environmental, and psychological processes in pain and disability has supported the involvement of a number of biobehavioral factors in these conditions. Physical therapists and other health care providers have become more aware of these factors and their impact on the evaluation, treatment, and management of LBP. Despite this recognition, little information is available that translates the implications of this research to direct care within physical therapy practice. The purposes of this article are (1) to provide an operational definition of biobehavioral factors; (2) to review the role of these factors in the clinical presentation of LBP, functional limitation, and disability; (3) to identify commonly used approaches for their recognition and quantification; (4) to illustrate how an understanding of biobehavioral factors can assist the physical therapist in evaluation and treatment of patients with LBP; and (5) to identify certain gaps in current knowledge of the role of biobehavioral factors and their application in physical therapy. Given the central role assumed by many physical therapists in the management of LBP, acknowledging and addressing these factors in clinical practice should assist in the prevention of chronic LBP and disability, as well as potentially improve physical therapy interventions and management.