Synaptic release of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens of the intact rat brain elicited by a single electrical impulse applied to ascending dopaminergic fibers results in extracellular concentrations sufficient to bind the known dopamine receptors. The dopamine concentration observed after four rapid, sequential pulses is exactly four times greater and is unaffected by pharmacological antagonism of dopamine uptake and receptor sites at supramaximal concentrations. Thus, dopamine efflux from the synaptic cleft is not restricted by binding to intrasynaptic proteins on the time scale of the measurements (50–100 msec). The extracellular concentration, as a result of a single stimulus pulse, is 0.25 microM and is rapidly removed by extrasynaptic uptake. This maximal, transient concentration of dopamine is 60 times higher than steady-state concentrations reported previously using dialysis techniques, illustrating that dopamine extracellular concentrations are spatially and temporally heterogenous. In contrast to ACh transmission at the neuromuscular junction, the dopamine synapse in the telencephalon is designed for the effective efflux of dopamine from the synaptic cleft to the extrasynaptic compartment during neurotransmission.

No abstract

No abstract

Mesolimbic dopamine-releasing neurons appear to be important in the brain reward system. One behavioural paradigm that supports this hypothesis is intracranial self-stimulation (ICS), during which animals repeatedly press a lever to stimulate their own dopamine-releasing neurons electrically. Here we study dopamine release from dopamine terminals in the nucleus accumbens core and shell in the brain by using rapid-responding voltammetric microsensors during electrical stimulation of dopamine cell bodies in the ventral tegmental area/substantia nigra brain regions. In rats in which stimulating electrode placement failed to elicit dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens, ICS behaviour was not learned. In contrast, ICS was acquired when stimulus trains evoked extracellular dopamine in either the core or the shell of the nucleus accumbens. In animals that could learn ICS, experimenter-delivered stimulation always elicited dopamine release. In contrast, extracellular dopamine was rarely observed during ICS itself. Thus, although activation of mesolimbic dopamine-releasing neurons seems to be a necessary condition for ICS, evoked dopamine release is actually diminished during ICS. Dopamine may therefore be a neural substrate for novelty or reward expectation rather than reward itself.

The fundamental process that underlies volume transmission in the brain is the extracellular diffusion of neurotransmitters from release sites to distal target cells. Dopaminergic neurons display a range of activity states, from low-frequency tonic firing to bursts of high-frequency action potentials (phasic firing). However, it is not clear how this activity affects volume transmission on a subsecond time scale. To evaluate this, we developed a finite-difference model that predicts the lifetime and diffusion of dopamine in brain tissue. We first used this model to decode in vivo amperometric measurements of electrically evoked dopamine, and obtained rate constants for release and uptake as well as the extent of diffusion. Accurate predictions were made under a variety of conditions including different regions, different stimulation parameters and with uptake inhibited. Second, we used the decoded rate constants to predict how heterogeneity of dopamine release and uptake sites would affect dopamine concentration fluctuations during different activity states in the absence of an electrode. These simulations show that synchronous phasic firing can produce spatially and temporally heterogeneous concentration profiles whereas asynchronous tonic firing elicits uniform, steady-state dopamine concentrations. Keywords: amperometry, caudate-putamen, cocaine, diffusion, steady state, volume transmission. J. Neurochem. (2003Neurochem. ( ) 87, 1284Neurochem. ( -1295 Dopaminergic neurons fire in a low-frequency tonic mode and periodically exhibit bursts of high-frequency action potentials . Microdialysis studies have revealed that tonic dopamine concentrations are in the low nanomolar range (Justice 1993). Recently, naturally occuring increases in dopamine concentration have been detected on a subsecond time scale with carbon-fiber electrodes Phillips et al. 2003). These transients appear to arise from phasic firing because they are mimicked by high-frequency electrical stimulation of dopaminergic cell bodies. Like the phasic firing of dopaminergic neurons that occurs during salient stimuli (Schultz 1998), the dopamine transients can be matched to specific behaviors such as interaction with another animal (Robinson et al. 2001 or lever pressing to self-administer cocaine (Phillips et al. 2003).It is well documented that dopamine in the striatum communicates via volume transmission (Garris et al. 1994) which differs from the classic synaptic mode of wiring transmission because neurotransmitter can diffuse to target cells distant from release sites (Zoli et al. 1998;Vizi 2000). The existence of naturally occuring dopamine concentration transients in the brain raises several questions. Are there temporal differences in dopamine concentrations at release and target sites? Is dopamine volume transmission differentially affected by tonic and phasic firing patterns? To answer such questions, mathematical models that consider the rates of release, uptake and coupled diffusion are required. Although several models have been d...

Regional differences in the kinetics and pharmacological inhibition of dopamine uptake were investigated with fast‐scan cyclic voltammetry in both the intact rat brain and a brain slice preparation. The regions compared were the basolateral amygdaloid nucleus, caudate‐putamen, and nucleus accumbens. The frequency dependence of dopamine efflux evoked in vivo by electrical stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle was evaluated by nonlinear curve fitting with a Michaelis‐Menten‐based kinetic model. The Km for dopamine uptake was found to be significantly higher in the basolateral amygdala (0.6 µM) than in the other two regions (0.2 µM), whereas the Vmax value for dopamine uptake in the basolateral amygdala was significantly lower (0.49 µM/s vs. 3.8 and 2.4 µM/s in the caudate and accumbens, respectively). Similar kinetics were also obtained in brain slices. Addition of a dopamine uptake inhibitor, cocaine or nomifensine (10 µM), to the perfusion buffer increased the apparent Km value >25‐fold in slices of both the caudate‐putamen and nucleus accumbens. In contrast, neither uptake inhibitor had an observable effect in the basolateral amygdaloid nucleus. Thus, dopamine uptake in the rat brain is regionally distinct with regard to rate, affinity, and sensitivity to competitive inhibition.

Although microdialysis is widely used to sample endogenous and exogenous substances in vivo, interpretation of the results obtained by this technique remains controversial. The goal of the present study was to examine recent criticism of microdialysis in the specific case of dopamine (DA) measurements in the brain extracellular microenvironment. The apparent steady-state basal extracellular concentration and extraction fraction of DA were determined in anesthetized rat striatum by the concentration difference (no-net-flux) microdialysis technique. A rate constant for extracellular clearance of DA calculated from the extraction fraction was smaller than the previously determined estimate by fast-scan cyclic voltammetry for cellular uptake of DA. Because the relatively small size of the voltammetric microsensor produces little tissue damage, the discrepancy between the uptake rate constants may be a consequence of trauma from microdialysis probe implantation. The trauma layer has previously been identified by histology and proposed to distort measurements of extracellular DA levels by the no-net-flux method. To address this issue, an existing quantitative mathematical model for microdialysis was modified to incorporate a traumatized tissue layer interposed between the probe and surrounding normal tissue. The tissue layers are hypothesized to differ in their rates of neurotransmitter release and uptake. A post-implantation traumatized layer with reduced uptake and no release can reconcile the discrepancy between DA uptake measured by microdialysis and voltammetry. The model predicts that this trauma layer would cause the DA extraction fraction obtained from microdialysis in vivo calibration techniques, such as no-net-flux, to differ from the DA relative recovery and lead to an underestimation of the DA extracellular concentration in the surrounding normal tissue.

Receptor-mediated feedback control plays an important role in dopamine (DA) neurotransmission. Recent evidence suggests that release and uptake, key mechanisms determining brain extracellular levels of the neurotransmitter, are governed by presynaptic autoreceptors. The goal of this study was to investigate whether autoreceptors regulate both mechanisms concurrently. Extracellular DA in the caudate-putamen and nucleus accumbens, evoked by electrical stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle, was monitored in the anesthetized rat by real-time voltammetry. Effects of the D2 antagonist haloperidol (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) on evoked DA levels were measured to evaluate autoreceptor control mechanisms. Two strategies were used to resolve individual contributions of release and uptake to the robust increases in DA signals observed after acute haloperidol challenge in naive animals: pretreatment with 3beta-(p-chlorophenyl)tropan-2beta-carboxylic acid p-isothiocyanatophenylmethyl ester hydrochloride (RTI-76; 100 nmol, i.c.v.), an irreversible inhibitor of the DA transporter, and kinetic analysis of extracellular DA dynamics. RTI-76 effectively removed the uptake component from recorded signals. In RTI-76-pretreated rats, haloperidol induced only modest increases in DA elicited by low frequencies and had little or no effect at high frequencies. These results suggest that D2 antagonism alters uptake at all frequencies but only release at low frequencies. Kinetic analysis similarly demonstrated that haloperidol decreased V(max) for DA uptake and increased DA release at low (10-30 Hz) but not high (40-60 Hz) stimulus frequencies. We conclude that presynaptic DA autoreceptors concurrently downregulate release and upregulate uptake, and that the mechanisms are also independently controlled during neurotransmission.