This article summarizes the new 2011 report on dietary requirements for calcium and vitamin D from the Institute of Medicine (IOM). An IOM Committee charged with determining the population needs for these nutrients in North America conducted a comprehensive review of the evidence for both skeletal and extraskeletal outcomes. The Committee concluded that available scientific evidence supports a key role of calcium and vitamin D in skeletal health, consistent with a cause-and-effect relationship and providing a sound basis for determination of intake requirements. For extraskeletal outcomes, including cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and autoimmune disorders, the evidence was inconsistent, inconclusive as to causality, and insufficient to inform nutritional requirements. Randomized clinical trial evidence for extraskeletal outcomes was limited and generally uninformative. Based on bone health, Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDAs; covering requirements of ≥97.5% of the population) for calcium range from 700 to 1300 mg/d for life-stage groups at least 1 yr of age. For vitamin D, RDAs of 600 IU/d for ages 1–70 yr and 800 IU/d for ages 71 yr and older, corresponding to a serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level of at least 20 ng/ml (50 nmol/liter), meet the requirements of at least 97.5% of the population. RDAs for vitamin D were derived based on conditions of minimal sun exposure due to wide variability in vitamin D synthesis from ultraviolet light and the risks of skin cancer. Higher values were not consistently associated with greater benefit, and for some outcomes U-shaped associations were observed, with risks at both low and high levels. The Committee concluded that the prevalence of vitamin D inadequacy in North America has been overestimated. Urgent research and clinical priorities were identified, including reassessment of laboratory ranges for 25-hydroxyvitamin D, to avoid problems of both undertreatment and overtreatment.

It is well-recognized that young women with untreated premature ovarian failure (POF) are at increased risk of osteoporosis and bone fracture. Large, randomized trials have demonstrated that hormone replacement therapy with estrogen/progesterone in postmenopausal women can dramatically improve bone mineral density (BMD) and reduce fracture risk; however, there are little data on the effect of hormone replacement in young women with POF. At present, young women with POF are given either combined hormone replacement treatment or physiologic SSR (pSSR) consisting of combined transdermal estradiol and vaginal progesterone replacement regimens.This open-label, randomized controlled crossover pilot trial was designed to determine whether a regimen of pSSR could improve skeletal health among young women with POF caused by a variety of reasons. A total of 34 patients were randomized to receive a 4-week cycle of either pSSR (transdermal estradiol 100 g daily for week 1 and 150 g for weeks 2-4, with progesterone 200 mg twice daily for weeks 3-4) or standard hormone replacement therapy (sHRT) (oral ethinyl estradiol 30 g and norethisterone 1.5 mg daily for weeks 1-3, followed by 7 "pill-free" days for 12 months). Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry was used to measure BMD at baseline and after each 12-month treatment period. During the study period, blood samples were collected for hormonal measurements and for markers of bone formation (bone alkaline phosphatase and procollagen type I aminoterminal propeptide) and bone resorption (CrossLaps [cross-linked C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen]) before and after each washout period, and at 3, 6, and 12 months. Of the 34 women, 18 (mean age 27; range, 19-39 years) completed the study. LH (luteinizing hormone) and FSH (follicle-stimulating hormone) were decreased to a similar extent by both pSSR and sHRT. Treatment with pSSR increased the mean baseline lumbar spine BMD z-score by ϩ0.17 (95% confidence interval: ϩ0.07 to ϩ0.27; P ϭ 0.003), whereas there was no significant increase in response to sHRT (ϩ0.07, with a 95% confidence interval: Ϫ0.03 to ϩ0.18; P ϭ 0.2). During pSSR, the increment in lumbar spine BMD z-score was positively associated with estradiol (r ϭ ϩ0.49; P ϭ 0.04) and inversely associated with FSH (r ϭ Ϫ0.65; P ϭ 0.004). Both bone alkaline phosphatase and procollagen type I amino-terminal propeptide were increased significantly by pSSR ( ANOVA P Ͻ 0.001). In contrast, both of these bone formation markers were decreased by sHRT (P Ͻ 0.01). The bone resorption marker, CrossLaps, was suppressed by both regimens (P Ͻ 0.001). GYNECOLOGYVolume 66, Number 6 OBSTETRICAL AND GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY

In early 2011, a committee convened by the Institute of Medicine issued a report on the Dietary Reference Intakes for calcium and vitamin D. The Endocrine Society Task Force in July 2011 published a guideline for the evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency. Although these reports are intended for different purposes, the disagreements concerning the nature of the available data and the resulting conclusions have caused confusion for clinicians, researchers, and the public. In this commentary, members of the Institute of Medicine committee respond to aspects of The Endocrine Society guideline that are not well supported and in need of reconsideration. These concerns focus on target serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels, the definition of vitamin D deficiency, and the question of who constitutes a population at risk vs. the general population.

The First International Conference on Controversies in Vitamin D was held in Pisa, Italy, 14-16 June 2017. The meeting's purpose was to address controversies in vitamin D research, review the data available, to help resolve them, and suggest a research agenda to clarify areas of uncertainty. The serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentration [i.e. the sum of 25(OH)D and 25(OH)D ] remains the critical measurement for defining vitamin D status. Assay variation for 25(OH)D has contributed to the current chaos surrounding efforts to define hypovitaminosis D. An essential requirement to develop a consensus on vitamin D status is that measurement of 25(OH)D and, in the future, other potential vitamin D biomarkers [e.g. 1α,25(OH) D , 3-epi-25(OH)D, 24,25(OH) D vitamin D-binding protein, free/bioavailable 25(OH)D and parathyroid hormone] be standardized/harmonized, to allow pooling of research data. Vitamin D Standardization Program tools are described and recommended for standardizing 25(OH)D measurement in research. In the future, similar methodology, based on National Institute for Standards and Technology standard reference materials, must be developed for other candidate markers of vitamin D status. Failure to standardize/harmonize vitamin D metabolite measurements is destined to promulgate continued chaos. At this time, 25(OH)D values below 12 ng ml (30 nmol l ) should be considered to be associated with an increased risk of rickets/osteomalacia, whereas 25(OH)D concentrations between 20 ng ml and 50 ng ml (50-125 nmol l ) appear to be safe and sufficient in the general population for skeletal health. In an effort to bridge knowledge gaps in defining hypovitaminosis D, an international study on rickets as a multifactorial disease is proposed.

No abstract