2012
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2011-2218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IOM Committee Members Respond to Endocrine Society Vitamin D Guideline

Abstract: In early 2011, a committee convened by the Institute of Medicine issued a report on the Dietary Reference Intakes for calcium and vitamin D. The Endocrine Society Task Force in July 2011 published a guideline for the evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency. Although these reports are intended for different purposes, the disagreements concerning the nature of the available data and the resulting conclusions have caused confusion for clinicians, researchers, and the public. In this commenta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
290
0
13

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 487 publications
(311 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
8
290
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Apparently, using our supplementation policy, baseline serum 25(OH)D is the strongest predictor for the magnitude of 25(OH)D change, not the dose itself, even when using high supplementation doses. Using a standard supplementation dose of 800 IU/day, as advocated in many guidelines on osteoporosis and fractre prevention (23,24), the percentage of patients reaching a serum 25(OH)D level R50 nmol/l were similar when using higher doses, at any baseline serum 25(OH)D. This result confirms that baseline serum 25(OH)D is the most important predictor of response to vitamin D3 supplementation. Therefore, if the aim is to achieve a serum 25(OH)D R50 nmol/l, as in our study, higher vitamin D supplementation doses than 800 IU/day are not needed (6,7,24).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Apparently, using our supplementation policy, baseline serum 25(OH)D is the strongest predictor for the magnitude of 25(OH)D change, not the dose itself, even when using high supplementation doses. Using a standard supplementation dose of 800 IU/day, as advocated in many guidelines on osteoporosis and fractre prevention (23,24), the percentage of patients reaching a serum 25(OH)D level R50 nmol/l were similar when using higher doses, at any baseline serum 25(OH)D. This result confirms that baseline serum 25(OH)D is the most important predictor of response to vitamin D3 supplementation. Therefore, if the aim is to achieve a serum 25(OH)D R50 nmol/l, as in our study, higher vitamin D supplementation doses than 800 IU/day are not needed (6,7,24).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…24,26 La falta de unidad en los valores de referencia utilizados para la clasificación de las deficiencias e insuficiencias en los diferentes estudios también causa una gran variabilidad en los reportes e impide un adecuado análisis de la situación a nivel regional. 27,28 En general, habrá que considerar que la insuficiencia de vitamina D corresponde a valores séricos inferiores a 30 ng/ml y que la deficiencia a valores inferiores a 20 ng/ml son los criterios más aceptados a nivel mundial, 13 aunque no necesariamente son considerados los mejores, ya que algunos autores asocian niveles séricos más altos de esta vitamina con efectos protectores contra enfermedades como el cáncer. 2,13 Realizar estudios como el aquí presentado sobre los niveles de vitamina D de la población saludable en un determinado entorno resulta de gran importancia como referencia para futuros estudios de grupos poblacionales comparables pero en otras condiciones de salud.…”
Section: Cuadro Iunclassified
“…Some experts consider serum 25(OH)D concentrations higher than 75 nmol/l as adequate not just for bone health, but for the non-skeletal effects as well (3,4). Others suggest that serum 25(OH)D concentrations of 50 nmol/l are sufficient (5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%