Aim: High altitude (HA) hypoxia may affect cognitive performance and sleep quality. Further, vigilance is reduced following sleep deprivation. We investigated the effect on vigilance, actigraphic sleep indices, and their relationships with acute mountain sickness (AMS) during very HA exposure, acclimatization, and re-exposure.Methods: A total of 21 healthy altitude-naive individuals (25 ± 4 years; 13 females) completed 2 cycles of altitude exposure separated by 7 days at low altitude (LA, 520 m). Participants slept at 2900 m and spent the day at HA, (5050 m). We report acute altitude exposure on Day 1 (LA vs. HA1) and after 6 days of acclimatization (HA1 vs. HA6). Vigilance was quantified by reaction speed in the 10-min psychomotor vigilance test reaction speed (PVT-RS). AMS was evaluated using the Environmental Symptoms Questionnaire Cerebral Score (AMS-C score). Nocturnal rest/activity was recorded to estimate sleep duration using actigraphy.Results: In Cycle 1, PVT-RS was slower at HA1 compared to LA (4.1 ± 0.8 vs. 4.5 ± 0.6 s-1, respectively, p = 0.029), but not at HA6 (4.6 ± 0.7; p > 0.05). In Cycle 2, PVT-RS at HA1 (4.6 ± 0.7) and HA6 (4.8 ± 0.6) were not different from LA (4.8 ± 0.6, p > 0.05) and significantly greater than corresponding values in Cycle 1. In both cycles, AMS scores were higher at HA1 than at LA and HA6 (p < 0.05). Estimated sleep durations (TST) at LA, 1st and 5th nights were 431.3 ± 28.7, 418.1 ± 48.6, and 379.7 ± 51.4 min, respectively, in Cycle 1 and they were significantly reduced during acclimatization exposures (LA vs. 1st night, p > 0.05; LA vs. 5th night, p = 0.012; and 1st vs. 5th night, p = 0.054). LA, 1st and 5th nights TST in Cycle 2 were 477.5 ± 96.9, 430.9 ± 34, and 341.4 ± 32.2, respectively, and we observed similar deteriorations in TST as in Cycle 1 (LA vs. 1st night, p > 0.05; LA vs. 5th night, p = 0.001; and 1st vs. 5th night, p < 0.0001). At HA1, subjects who reported higher AMS-C scores exhibited slower PVT-RS (r = -0.56; p < 0.01). Subjects with higher AMS-C scores took longer time to react to the stimuli during acute exposure (r = 0.62, p < 0.01) during HA1 of Cycle 1.Conclusion: Acute exposure to HA reduces the PVT-RS. Altitude acclimatization over 6 days recovers the reaction speed and prevents impairments during subsequent altitude re-exposure after 1 week spent near sea level. However, acclimatization does not lead to improvement in total sleep time during acute and subacute exposures.

Objective: Neurocognitive functions are affected by high altitude, however the altitude effects of acclimatization and repeated exposures are unclear. We investigated the effects of acute, subacute and repeated exposure to 5,050 m on cognition among altitude-naïve participants compared to control subjects tested at low altitude.Methods: Twenty-one altitude-naïve individuals (25.3 ± 3.8 years, 13 females) were exposed to 5,050 m for 1 week (Cycle 1) and re-exposed after a week of rest at sea-level (Cycle 2). Baseline (BL, 520 m), acute (Day 1, HA1) and acclimatization (Day 6, HA6, 5,050 m) measurements were taken in both cycles. Seventeen control subjects (24.9 ± 2.6 years, 12 females) were tested over a similar period in Calgary, Canada (1,103 m). The Reaction Time (RTI), Attention Switching Task (AST), Rapid Visual Processing (RVP) and One Touch Stockings of Cambridge (OTS) tasks were administered and outcomes were expressed in milliseconds/frequencies. Lake Louise Score (LLS) and blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) were recorded.Results: In both cycles, no significant changes were found with acute exposure on the AST total score, mean latency and SD. Significant changes were found upon acclimatization solely in the altitude group, with improved AST Mean Latency [HA1 (588 ± 92) vs. HA6 (526 ± 91), p < 0.001] and Latency SD [HA1 (189 ± 86) vs. HA6 (135 ± 65), p < 0.001] compared to acute exposure, in Cycle 1. No significant differences were present in the control group. When entering Acute SpO2 (HA1-BL), Acclimatization SpO2 (HA6-BL) and LLS score as covariates for both cycles, the effects of acclimatization on AST outcomes disappeared indicating that the changes were partially explained by SpO2 and LLS. The changes in AST Mean Latency [ΔBL (−61.2 ± 70.2) vs. ΔHA6 (−28.0 ± 58), p = 0.005] and the changes in Latency SD [ΔBL (−28.4 ± 41.2) vs. ΔHA6 (−0.2235 ± 34.8), p = 0.007] across the two cycles were smaller with acclimatization. However, the percent changes did not differ between cycles. These results indicate independent effects of altitude across repeated exposures.Conclusions: Selective and sustained attention are impaired at altitude and improves with acclimatization.The observed changes are associated, in part, with AMS score and SpO2. The gains in cognition with acclimatization during a first exposure are not carried over to repeated exposures.

In patients with PAH/CTEPH, very short-term exposure to moderate hypoxia similar to 2600 m altitude or during commercial air travel did not deteriorate hemodynamics. These results encourage studying the response of PAH/CTEPH during daytrips to the mountain or air travel.

Study questionWe investigated whether domiciliary oxygen therapy (DOXT) increases exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with pulmonary arterial or distal chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (PAH/CTEPH) presenting with mild resting hypoxaemia and exercise-induced oxygen desaturation.Materials and methods30 patients with PAH/CTEPH, mean±sdage 60±15 years, pulmonary artery pressure 39±11 mmHg, resting arterial oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2) ≥90%,SpO2drop during a 6-min walk test ≥4%, on pulmonary hypertension-targeted medication, were randomised in a double-blind crossover protocol to DOXT and placebo (ambient air) treatment, each over 5 weeks, at 3 L·min−1vianasal cannula overnight and when resting during the day. Treatment periods were separated by 2 weeks of washout. Co-primary outcomes were changes in 6-min walk distance (6MWD, breathing ambient air) and physical functioning scale of the 36-item short-form medical outcome questionnaire during treatment periods.ResultsDOXT increased the 6MWD from baseline 478±113 m by a mean (95% CI) of 19 (6–32) m, and physical functioning from 52±29 by 4 (0–8) points. Corresponding changes with placebo were 1 (−11–13) m in 6MWD and −2 (−6–2) points in physical functioning. Between-treatment differences in changes were 6MWD 18 (1–35) m (p=0.042) and physical functioning 6 (1–11) points (p=0.029). DOXT significantly improved the New York Heart Association functional classversusplacebo.Answer to the questionThis first randomised trial in PAH/CTEPH patients with exercise-induced hypoxaemia demonstrates that DOXT improves exercise capacity, quality of life and functional class. The results support large long-term randomised trials of DOXT in PAH/CTEPH.

Background To investigate the effect of asthma rehabilitation at high altitude (3100 m, HA) compared to low altitude (760 m, LA). Methods For this randomized parallel-group trial insufficiently controlled asthmatics (Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) > 0.75) were randomly assigned to 3-week in-hospital rehabilitation comprising education, physical-&breathing-exercises at LA or HA. Co-primary outcomes assessed at 760 m were between group changes in peak expiratory flow (PEF)-variability, and ACQ) from baseline to end-rehabilitation and 3 months thereafter. Results 50 asthmatics were randomized [median (quartiles) LA: ACQ 2.7(1.7;3.2), PEF-variability 19%(14;33); HA: ACQ 2.0(1.6;3.0), PEF-variability 17%(12;32)]. The LA-group improved PEF-variability by median(95%CI) -7%(− 14 to 0, p = 0.033), ACQ − 1.4(− 2.2 to − 0.9, p < 0.001), and after 3 months by − 3%(− 18 to 2, p = 0.103) and − 0.9(− 1.3 to − 0.3, p = 0.002). The HA-group improved PEF-variability by − 10%(− 21 to − 3, p = 0.004), ACQ − 1.1(− 1.3 to − 0.7, p < 0.001), and after 3 months by − 9%(− 10 to − 3, p = 0.003) and − 0.2(− 0.9 to 0.4, p = 0.177). The additive effect of HA vs. LA directly after the rehabilitation on PEF-variability was − 6%(− 14 to 2), on ACQ 0.3(− 0.4 to 1.1) and after 3 months − 5%(− 14 to 5) respectively 0.4(− 0.4 to 1.1), all p = NS. Conclusion Asthma rehabilitation is highly effective in improving asthma control in terms of PEF-variability and symptoms, both at LA and HA similarly. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02741583 , Registered April 18, 2016. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12890-019-0890-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The question addressed by the studyChronic exposure to hypoxia increases pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) in highlanders, but the criteria for diagnosis of high altitude pulmonary hypertension (HAPH) are debated. We assessed cardiac function and PAP in highlanders at 3250 m and explored HAPH-prevalence using different definitions.Patients and methodsCentral Asian highlanders free of overt cardio-respiratory disease, permanently living at 2500–3500 m compared to age-matched lowlanders living <800 m. Participants underwent echocardiography close to their altitude of residence (at 3250 m versus 760 m).Results173 participants (97 highlanders, 76 lowlanders), mean±sd age 49±9 years (49% females) completed the study. Results in lowlanders versus highlanders were: systolic PAP (23±5 versus 30±10 mmHg), right ventricular fractional area change (42±6 versus 39±8%), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (2.1±0.3 versus 2.0±0.3 cm), right atrial volume index (20±6 versus 23±8 mL·m−2), left ventricular ejection fraction (62±4 versus 57±5%) and stroke volume (64±10 versus 57±11 mL), all between group comparisons p<0.05. Depending on criteria, HAPH-prevalence varied between 6 and 35%.The answer to the questionChronic exposure to hypoxia in highlanders is associated with higher PAP and slight alterations in right and left heart function compared to lowlanders. The prevalence of HAPH in this large highlander-cohort varies between 6% according to expert consensus definition of chronic high-altitude disease to 35% according to the most recent PH-definition proposed for lowlanders.

Background: High-altitude pulmonary edema is associated with elevated systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) and increased extravascular lung water (EVLW). We investigated sPAP and EVLW during repeated exposures to high altitude (HA). Methods: Healthy lowlanders underwent two identical 7-day HA-cycles, where subjects slept at 2900 m and spent 4-8 h daily at 5050 m, separated by a weeklong break at low altitude (LA). Echocardiography and EVLW by B-lines were measured at 520 m (baseline, LA 1 ), on day one, two and six at 5050 m (HA 1-3 ) and after descent (LA 2 ). Results: We included 21 subjects (median 25 years, body mass index 22 kg/m 2 , SpO 2 98%). SPAP rose from 21 mmHg at LA 1 to 38 mmHg at HA 1 , decreased to 30 mmHg at HA 3 (both p < 0.05 vs LA 1 ) and normalized at 20 mmHg at LA 2 (p = ns vs LA 1 ). B-lines increased from 0 at LA 1 to 6 at HA 2 and 7 at HA 3 (both p < 0.05 vs LA 1 ) and receded to 1 at LA 2 (p = ns vs LA 1 ). Overall, in cycle two, sPAP did not differ (mean difference (95% confidence interval) −0.2(−2.3 to 1.9) mmHg, p = 0.864) but B-lines were more prevalent (+2.3 (1.4-3.1), p < 0.001) compared to cycle 1. Right ventricular systolic function decreased significantly but minimally at 5050 m. Conclusions: Exposure to 5050 m induced a rapid increase in sPAP. B-lines rose during prolonged exposures to 5050 m, despite gradual decrease in sPAP, indicating excessive hydrostatic pressure might not be solely responsible for EVLW-development. Repeated HA-exposure had no acclimatization effect on EVLW. This may affect workers needing repetitive ascents to altitude and could indicate greater B-line development upon repeated exposure.

Background: Lung-protective ventilation is key in bridging patients suffering from COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) to recovery. However, resource and personnel limitations during pandemics complicate the implementation of lung-protective protocols. Automated ventilation modes may prove decisive in these settings enabling higher degrees of lung-protective ventilation than conventional modes. Method: Prospective study at a Swiss university hospital. Critically ill, mechanically ventilated COVID-19 ARDS patients were allocated, by study-blinded coordinating staff, to either closed-loop or conventional mechanical ventilation, based on mechanical ventilator availability. Primary outcome was the overall achieved percentage of lung-protective ventilation in closed-loop versus conventional mechanical ventilation, assessed minute-by-minute, during the initial 7 days and overall mechanical ventilation time. Lung-protective ventilation was defined as the combined target of tidal volume <8 ml per kg of ideal body weight, dynamic driving pressure <15 cmH2O, peak pressure <30 cmH2O, peripheral oxygen saturation ≥88% and dynamic mechanical power <17 J/min. Results: Forty COVID-19 ARDS patients, accounting for 1,048,630 minutes (728 days) of cumulative mechanical ventilation, allocated to either closed-loop (n = 23) or conventional ventilation (n = 17), presenting with a median paO2/ FiO2 ratio of 92 [72-147] mmHg and a static compliance of 18 [11-25] ml/cmH2O, were mechanically ventilated for 11 [4-25] days and had a 28-day mortality rate of 20%. During the initial 7 days of mechanical ventilation, patients in the closed-loop group were ventilated lung-protectively for 65% of the time versus 38% in the conventional group (Odds Ratio, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.76-1.82; P < 0.001) and for 45% versus 33% of overall mechanical ventilation time (Odds Ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.21-1.23; P < 0.001). Conclusion: Among critically ill, mechanically ventilated COVID-19 ARDS patients during an early highpoint of the pandemic, mechanical ventilation using a closed-loop mode was associated with a higher degree of lung-protective ventilation than was conventional mechanical ventilation.