In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. A key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process vs. those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process); thus, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation needs to be differentiated from stimuli that result in increased autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field

The apoptosis-inducing death receptor CD95 (APO-1/Fas) controls the homeostasis of many tissues. Despite its apoptotic potential, most human tumors are refractory to the cytotoxic effects of CD95 ligand. We now show that CD95 stimulation of multiple apoptosis-resistant tumor cells by CD95 ligand induces increased motility and invasiveness, a response much less efficiently triggered by TNFa or TRAIL. Three signaling pathways resulting in activation of NF-jB, Erk1/2 and caspase-8 were found to be important to this novel activity of CD95. Gene chip analyses of a CD95-stimulated tumor cell line identified a number of potential survival genes and genes that are known to regulate increased motility and invasiveness of tumor cells to be induced. Among these genes, urokinase plasminogen activator was found to be required for the CD95 ligand-induced motility and invasiveness. Our data suggest that CD95L, which is found elevated in many human cancer patients, has tumorigenic activities on human cancer cells. This could become highly relevant during chemotherapy, which can cause upregulation of CD95 ligand by both tumor and nontumor cells.

Patients affected by chronic inflammatory disorders display high amounts of soluble CD95L. This homotrimeric ligand arises from the cleavage by metalloproteases of its membrane-bound counterpart, a strong apoptotic inducer. In contrast, the naturally processed CD95L is viewed as an apoptotic antagonist competing with its membrane counterpart for binding to CD95. Recent reports pinpointed that activation of CD95 may attract myeloid and tumoral cells, which display resistance to the CD95-mediated apoptotic signal. However, all these studies were performed using chimeric CD95Ls (oligomerized forms), which behave as the membrane-bound ligand and not as the naturally processed CD95L. Herein, we examine the biological effects of the metalloprotease-cleaved CD95L on CD95-sensitive activated T-lymphocytes. We demonstrate that cleaved CD95L (cl-CD95L), found increased in sera of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients as compared to that of healthy individuals, promotes the formation of migrating pseudopods at the leading edge of which the death receptor CD95 is capped (confocal microscopy). Using different migration assays (wound healing/Boyden Chamber/endothelial transmigration), we uncover that cl-CD95L promotes cell migration through a c-yes/Ca2+/PI3K-driven signaling pathway, which relies on the formation of a CD95-containing complex designated the MISC for Motility-Inducing Signaling Complex. These findings revisit the role of the metalloprotease-cleaved CD95L and emphasize that the increase in cl-CD95L observed in patients affected by chronic inflammatory disorders may fuel the local or systemic tissue damage by promoting tissue-filtration of immune cells.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) lacks targeted therapies and has a worse prognosis than other breast cancer subtypes, underscoring an urgent need for new therapeutic targets and strategies. IRE1 is an endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress sensor, whose activation is predominantly linked to the resolution of ER stress and, in the case of severe stress, to cell death. Here we demonstrate that constitutive IRE1 RNase activity contributes to basal production of pro-tumorigenic factors IL-6, IL-8, CXCL1, GM-CSF, and TGFβ2 in TNBC cells. We further show that the chemotherapeutic drug, paclitaxel, enhances IRE1 RNase activity and this contributes to paclitaxel-mediated expansion of tumor-initiating cells. In a xenograft mouse model of TNBC, inhibition of IRE1 RNase activity increases paclitaxel-mediated tumor suppression and delays tumor relapse post therapy. We therefore conclude that inclusion of IRE1 RNase inhibition in therapeutic strategies can enhance the effectiveness of current chemotherapeutics.

Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) lacking estrogen and progesterone receptors and HER2 amplification have a relatively high risk of metastatic dissemination, but the mechanistic basis for this risk is not understood. Here, we report that serum levels of CD95 ligand (CD95L) are higher in patients with TNBC than in other patients with breast cancer. Metalloprotease-mediated cleavage of CD95L expressed by endothelial cells surrounding tumors generates a gradient that promotes cell motility due to the formation of an unconventional CD95-containing receptosome called the motility-inducing signaling complex. The formation of this complex was instrumental for Nox3-driven reactive oxygen species generation. Mechanistic investigations revealed a YesOrai1-EGFR-PI3K pathway that triggered migration of TNBC cells exposed to CD95L. Our findings establish a prometastatic function for metalloprotease-cleaved CD95L in TNBCs, revisiting its role in carcinogenesis. Cancer Res; 73(22); 6711-21. Ó2013 AACR.

CD95 is a member of the family of the death receptors that initiate apoptosis by recruiting Fas-associated death domain protein (FADD), procaspase-8, procaspase-10, and cellular FLICE-like inhibitory protein to the death-inducing signaling complex (DISC), which forms after binding of the cognate ligand (CD95L) (1). CD95 type I and II cells differ in their dependence on mitochondria for the execution of apoptosis in that type II cells require mitochondrial amplification to die (2). Hence, overexpression of antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family members only inhibits CD95-mediated apoptosis in type II cells. We proposed this CD95 two-pathway model based on a study of four tumor cell lines (2, 3), and a number of transgenic and knockout mice have demonstrated that this distinction also applies to normal tissues (e.g., liver cells are type II, and T cells are type I) (reviewed in ref. 4). One of the most striking differences between type I and II cells lies in the way the CD95 signal is generated at the receptor level. An efficient formation of the DISC is observed only in type I cells, whereas in type II cells it is difficult to detect by Western blotting (2). We recently demonstrated that formation of the DISC in type I cells involves F-actin (5) and that the receptor internalizes in an actin-and caspase-8-dependent fashion only in type I cells (6). These data suggest that type I cells differ from type II cells in the way the CD95 signal is initiated. This difference in signal initiation could result in a difference in sensitivity to CD95 stimuli.The cognate CD95L is expressed as both a membrane-bound (mCD95L) and soluble (sCD95L) form that is generated by metalloprotease cleavage of mCD95L (7,8). As yet, no clear specific separate function has been assigned to sCD95L or mCD95L. Here we uncover a striking difference in the response of type I and II tumor cell lines to different forms of CD95L. We found that a preparation of soluble sCD95L (S2) (9) efficiently kills type II cells. In contrast, type I cells are resistant to this cytotoxic activity. S2 therefore represents a tool for identifying type I and II cells. We applied this tool to a collection of 58 tumor cell lines of various histologic origin [of the Developmental Therapeutics Program of the National Cancer Institute (NCI)] (10). These cell lines have been subjected to a comprehensive microarray analysis to determine their patterns of gene expression and were found to cluster into two very distinct classes of cells (epithelium-like and mesenchymal-like) that share expression of similar sets of genes (11). We have determined that 22 of these 58 cell lines are CD95 apoptosis-sensitive and have classified half of these sensitive cells as type I and half as type II based on their sensitivity to S2 stimulation and their ability to form a DISC. Ten of 11 of the cell lines that we classified as type I cells were found in the mesenchymal branch, whereas 9 of 11 of the type II cells were found in the epithelial branch. The type I͞type II status of the cells was used to query t...

SummaryCD95 ligand (CD95L) is expressed by immune cells and triggers apoptotic death. Metalloprotease-cleaved CD95L (cl-CD95L) is released into the bloodstream but does not trigger apoptotic signaling. Hence, the pathophysiological role of cl-CD95L remains unclear. We observed that skin-derived endothelial cells from systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients expressed CD95L and that after cleavage, cl-CD95L promoted T helper 17 (Th17) lymphocyte transmigration across the endothelial barrier at the expense of T regulatory cells. T cell migration relied on a direct interaction between the CD95 domain called calcium-inducing domain (CID) and the Src homology 3 domain of phospholipase Cγ1. Th17 cells stimulated with cl-CD95L produced sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), which promoted endothelial transmigration by activating the S1P receptor 3. We generated a cell-penetrating CID peptide that prevented Th17 cell transmigration and alleviated clinical symptoms in lupus mice. Therefore, neutralizing the CD95 non-apoptotic signaling pathway could be an attractive therapeutic approach for SLE treatment.

No abstract