Sod‐seeding establishment of small‐seeded legumes and grasses has great potential for increasing forage production on previously non‐tillable lands. However, consistently successful stand establishment has been difficult to achieve via sod‐seeding. Even when adequate stands are obtained, they often lack the vigor associated with conventional establishment. A delay between the spraying of a non‐selective chemical for sod control and seeding with a minimum‐till drill has been suggested to improve sod‐seeding stand establishment. We conducted two field experiments to determine the optimum time interval needed between spraying glyphosate [N‐(phosphonomethyl) glycine] and sod‐seeding various grass and legume species with minimum‐till drills. The soils were classified as Cumulic Haploborolls and Ustic Tomfluvents in the first experiment and Udic Haploborolls and Typic Eutrochrepts in the second. A 14 day interval between spraying glyphosate and sodseeding alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), alsike clover (Trifolium hybridum L.), and tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) with either the John Deere Powr‐till drill or the Melroe 701 No‐till drill was needed for adequate establishment at Laramie, Wyoming in 1978. In 1979, a 7 to 14 day spray‐plant interval was needed for adequate establishment of alfalfa, alsike clover, creeping meadow foxtail (Alopecurus mundinaceus Poir.), and meadow bromegrass (Bromus biebersteinii Roem. & Schult.) when seeding with the John Deere drill. When seeding with the Melroe drill in 1979, no differences among spray‐plant intervals were obtained for the same species. At Kalipell, Montana in 1978, a 28 day delay between spraying glyphosate and sod‐seeding alfalfa with the John Deere drill was needed for adequate establishment; whereas ladino clover (Trifolium repens L.) required a 14 day interval between spraying and seeding. In 1979 at Kalispell, a 28 day spray‐plant interval was needed for adequate establishment of alfalfa. Ladino clover establiihment was very poor for all spray‐plant intervals. Inadequate legume establishment was associated with slug (Agriolimax reticulatum Müller) predation. Spraying 28 days prior to seeding allowed sufficient time for grass desiccation. This permitted sunlight to penetrate the canopy which dried out the furrow thereby providing a less favorable slug environment.
Winterhardiness of winter barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) has not been improved greatly during the last 40 yr. Explanations range from a presumed lack of genetic variance for hardiness to a lack of effective selection in winter barley improvement programs. Previous research in Montana utilized recurrent selection in composite crosses containing male sterility to increase genetic recombination and improve winterhardiness. Composite Cross XXVI (CCXXVI) was subjected to winter selection pressure at various Montana locations from 1966 to 1984. This research evaluated the effectiveness of natural selection on winter survival and various agronomic and morphological traits in CCXXVI. Field trials at 10 Montana locations from 1985 to 1987 were used to measure winter survival and agronomic traits. Changes in morphological traits were studied in field and controlled‐environment studies. Natural selection appeared to favor taller and later‐heading plants. No significant change in population grain yield over time was detected in CCXXVI. Natural selection improved winter survival in CCXXVI, but the selection was not uniform over generations and maximum population hardiness occurred midway through the experiment. The hardiest CCXXVI generation was lower in winter survival than a hardy winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and the same as a nonhardy winter wheat and a hardy winter barley cultivar. No significant correlation was found between seedling leaf width, seedling leaf number, or subcrown internode and mean winter survival. Shorter seedling leaf length was associated with enhanced winter survival.
No abstract
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.