This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Background
Nephrectomy is considered the backbone of managing patients with localized and selected metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The prognostic role of nephrectomy has been widely investigated with cytokines and targeted therapy, but it is still unclear in the immunotherapy era.
Methods
We investigated the Meet-URO-15 study dataset of 571 pretreated mRCC patients receiving nivolumab as second or further lines about the prognostic role of the previous nephrectomy (received in either the localized or metastatic setting) in the overall population and according to the Meet-URO score groups.
Results
Patients who underwent nephrectomy showed a significantly reduced risk of death (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.32–0.60, p < 0.001) with a longer median overall survival (OS) (35.9 months vs 12.1 months), 1-year OS of 71.6% vs 50.5% and 2-years OS of 56.5% vs 22.0% compared to those who did not. No significant interaction between nephrectomy and the overall five Meet-URO score risk groups was observed (p = 0.17). It was statistically significant when merging group 1 with 2 and 3 and group 4 with 5 (p = 0.038) and associated with a longer OS for the first three prognostic groups (p < 0.001), but not for groups 4 and 5 (p = 0.54).
Conclusions
Our study suggests an overall positive impact of the previous nephrectomy on the outcome of pretreated mRCC patients receiving immunotherapy. The clinical relevance of cytoreductive nephrectomy, optimal timing and patient selection deserves further investigation, especially for patients with Meet-URO scores of 1 to 3, who are the once deriving benefit in our analyses. However, that benefit is not evident for IMDC poor-risk patients (including the Meet-URO score groups 4 and 5) and a subgroup of IMDC intermediate-risk patients defined as group 4 by the Meet-URO score.
BackgroundTreatment choice for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients is still based on baseline clinical and laboratory factors.MethodsBy a pre-specified analysis of the Meet-URO 15 multicentric retrospective study enrolling 571 pretreated mRCC patients receiving nivolumab, baseline and early dynamic variations (Δ) of neutrophil, lymphocyte, and platelet absolute cell counts (ACC) and their inflammatory ratios (IR) were evaluated alongside their association with the best disease response and overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Multivariable analyses on OS and PFS between baseline and Δ ACC and IR values were investigated with receiving operating curves-based cut-offs.ResultsThe analysis included 422 mRCC patients. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) increased over time due to consistent neutrophil increase (p < 0.001). Higher baseline platelets (p = 0.044) and lower lymphocytes (p = 0.018), increasing neutrophil Δ (p for time-group interaction <0.001), higher baseline IR values (NLR: p = 0.012, SII: p = 0.003, PLR: p = 0.003), increasing NLR and systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII) (i.e., NLR x platelets) Δ (p for interaction time-group = 0.0053 and 0.0435, respectively) were associated with disease progression. OS and PFS were significantly shorter in patients with baseline lower lymphocytes (p < 0.001 for both) and higher platelets (p = 0.004 and p < 0.001, respectively) alongside early neutrophils Δ (p = 0.046 and p = 0.033, respectively). Early neutrophils and NLR Δ were independent prognostic factors for both OS (p = 0.014 and p = 0.011, respectively) and PFS (p = 0.023 and p = 0.001, respectively), alongside baseline NLR (p < 0.001 for both) and other known prognostic variables.ConclusionsEarly neutrophils and NLR Δ may represent new dynamic prognostic factors with clinical utility for on-treatment decisions.
8513 Background: Systemic chemotherapy in MPM is inevitably followed by relapse, and response rates to second line treatment are limited. T is an antineoplastic agent targeting both the malignant cells and the tumor microenvironment with demonstrated activity against a range of tumors. We aimed to study the activity and safety of T in advanced MPM. Methods: ATREUS, an Italian multicenter single arm phase II trial, assessed the activity T in MPM evaluating the proportion of patients responding to treatment and achieving progression free survival for 12 weeks (PFS12w). Pre-treated epithelioid and naive or pre-treated biphasic/sarcomatoid pts were treated until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Initial dose was 1.3 mg/m2, over 3 hours every 21 days, later reduced to 1.1 mg/m2to improve tolerability. In the epithelioid cohort, sample size was based on a Simon's Optimal Two-Stage Design. The study was set to reject, at an alpha error of 10% the hypothesis that PFS12w was ≤25% and to demonstrate, with a power of 85% the hypothesis that PFS12w was ≥40%. At least 20 out of 62 pts with assessed disease, no major protocol violations, either receiving ≥12 weeks of treatment or interrupting before for progression or death (per protocol – PP analysis) were to reach PFS12w in order to consider T effective. Results: 71 pts were enrolled and evaluable. Average age was 65.8 ± 8.75 years. 71.8% were male and 82.5% presented stage III or IV disease. 42.4% (25/59) of pts included in the PP analysis obtained PFS12w (95% CI: 29.6% - 55.9%). In a second, more conservative analysis, including pts withdrawn prematurely for toxicity or intercurrent illness as failures, PFS12w rate reached 38.5% (25/65 pts). The most frequent grade ≥3 treatment-related toxicities werehepatic toxicity (60.5%), non-febrile neutropenia (21.1%), and fatigue (6.6%). Five pts (7%) interrupted treatment for toxicities (2 liver, 1 multi-organ failure, 1 thrombocytopenia, 1 T intolerance). Conclusions: In pts with advanced epithelioid MPM, second line treatment with T showed an elevated rate of disease stabilization. Safety data is promising but require further evaluation. Clinical trial information: NCT02194231.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.