We studied effects of lesions to the medial preoptic area (POA), castration, and testosterone replacement on instrumental and unconditioned sexual behavior in male rats. We achieved instrumental measures of sexual motivation by training males to work for an estrous female, presented in an operant chamber under a second-order schedule of reinforcement. POA lesions abolished mounts, intromissions, and ejaculation but did not disrupt instrumental responses, investigation of the female, or abortive mounting attempts. Castration abolished attempts to copulate and also caused a marked decrease in instrumental responses. Testosterone resulted in the prompt reinstatement of instrumental responses and more gradual recovery of unconditioned sexual behavior. We discuss these results in terms of the motivational and performance effects of these neuroendocrine manipulations.

We describe a novel procedure for measuring instrumental sexual behavior in the male rat by using a second-order schedule of presentation of sexual reinforcement, an estrous female. Experimental assessment and validation of the paradigm have been achieved by examining fa) the importance of the conditioned stimulus in maintaining instrumental responding by measuring the effects of its omission during a test session, (b) the effects and motivational specificity on instrumental behavior of the postejaculatory refractory period (a period of sexual unarousability) and of satiety for food by measuring the impact of each manipulation on animals working for food and for a female, (c) the effects of replacing an estrous female with an anestrous one as the earned reward, and (d) the correlations between conditioned and unconditioned measures of sexual behavior. We conclude that the second-order paradigm provides a means of distinguishing between the etfects of neuroendocrine manipulations on incentive motivational and performance variables underlying the expression of sexual behavior.Attempts to understand the neuroendocrine mechanisms regulating sexual behavior have generally relied on a behavioral analysis that involves, almost exclusively, the quantification of consummatory responses. These include sexual reflexes, such as intromission in males and lordosis in females, as well as species-specific patterns of investigation, mounting, and proceptivity (Beach, 1976;Sachs & Barfield, 1976). Relatively little is known of the psychological processes affected by manipulation of the various neural and endocrine mechanisms that control the expression of sexual behavior. At least part of the explanation lies in the fact that sexual motivation has proved to be a difficult concept both to define and to measure, despite many attempts over several decades to specify factors affecting it (see Beach, 1956;Grossman, 1967: Pfaff, 1982Toates, 1986).Clearly, sexual behavior is not easily accommodated by homeostatic models of motivation: There are no obvious deficits that energize it, and operational definitions that depend on, for example, deprivation states are practically worthless. In terms of incentive motivational theories (see Bindra, 1976;Konorski, 1967;Morgan, 1979), which emphasize the processing of information related to stimuli, it has also proved difficult to define the processes affected by sex steroids, which critically determine the expression of sexual behavior and

Cortisol levels in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were studied in ovariectomized, estrogen-treated monkeys during either prolonged hypercortisolemia or the more transient effects of a bolus injection of cortisol. Control (saline-treated) animals showed the expected diurnal rhythm in serum cortisol, but proportionately more cortisol was present in the CSF when serum levels were high (i.e. in the morning). Prolonged hypercortisolemia for up to 37 days was produced by either thrice daily injections of cortisol itself or single daily injections of ACTH_1-24 in the morning. Both treatments produced disproportionately larger amounts of cortisol in the CSF than in the serum, and the CSF/serum cortisol ratio was increased. Furthermore, prolonged ACTH treatment caused a marked elevation in CSF cortisol in afternoon samples taken at 16.30 h compared with those at 10.00 h, in the absence of a similar change in serum cortisol levels. The relative importance of entry and clearance of cortisol in the CSF in these conditions was studied in several ways. ‘Free’ cortisol levels in serum (determined by equilibrium dialysis) were equal to CSF cortisol levels in control monkeys, but were less than those in the CSF of hypercortisolemic animals. Entry of cortisol into CSF after a bolus injection was rapid, but, unlike serum, CSF cortisol levels did not decline significantly over a 70-min sampling period and the delayed clearance from the CSF could account for some of the effects seen during hypercortisolemia. Neither high levels of prolactin (which is elevated together with cortisol in ‘stress’), induced by giving sulpiride, nor treatment with progesterone (which is also bound by corticosteroid binding globulin) altered the distribution of cortisol between blood and CSF. The concentrations of cortisol in the CSF therefore are regulated by factors influencing both its entry and clearance from the cerebral compartment. Neural tissues sensitive to cortisol are thus exposed to levels of this hormone that are both qualitatively and quantitatively different from those expected by direct extrapolation from serum levels.

A study was made in 2 consecutive years of the emotional states and morning and afternoon serum levels of prolactin, cortisol and testosterone of male medical students during a 4- to 5-week period preceding a major university examination. 'Distress', 'anxiety' and, to a lesser degree, 'depression' increased during the 2 weeks immediately preceding the examination and were positively correlated with personality anxiety or neuroticism traits. Group means for hormones showed no consistent change over the same period. Neither was there evidence for a correlation between endocrine and emotional changes within individual students during the pre-examination period. A restricted study showed that there were significant increments in cortisol in samples taken during the examination itself. Changes in emotional state before an examination occurred in the absence of equally dramatic changes in levels of the three hormones studied, though this relationship may have altered during the examination itself. This suggests that the factors controlling the two categories of response may relate differently, in some way, to the imminence of this stressful event.

The breeding seasons of two groups of pinealectomized ferrets and one group of blind ferrets, with appropriate controls, were observed for up to 5 years after the operations. All animals showed recurrent breeding seasons. Both pinealectomized and blind animals became increasingly asynchronous after the first season, but showed no evidence of a free-running, endogenous circannual periodicity nor of synchronization to light or other environmental cues.