Routine use of CCTA to triage Emergency Department (ED) chest pain can reduce ED length of stay while providing accurate diagnoses. We evaluated the effectiveness of using Computer Aided Diagnosis in the triage of low to intermediate risk emergency chest pain patients with Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography (CCTA). Using 64 and 320 slice CT scanners, we compared the diagnostic capability of computer aided diagnosis to human readers in 923 ED patients with chest pain. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value for cases performed on each scanner. We calculated the area under the Receiver Operator Curve (ROC) comparing results for the two scanners to Computer Aided Diagnosis performance as compared to the human reader. We examined index and 30 Day outcomes by diagnosis for each scanner and the human reader. 60% of cases could be triaged by the computer. Sensitivity was approximately 85% for both scanners, with specificity at 50.6% for the 64 slice and at 56.5% for the 320 slice scanner (per person measures). The NPV was 97.8 and 97.1 for the 64 and 320 slice scanners, respectively. Results for the four major vessels were similar with negative predictive values ranging from 97 to 100%. The ROC for Computer Aided Diagnosis for the 64 and 320 Slice Scanners, using the human reader as the gold standard was 0.6794 and 0.7097 respectively. The index and 30 day outcomes were consistent for the human reader and Computer Aided Diagnosis interpretation. Although Computer Aided Diagnosis with CCTA cannot serve completely as a substitute for human reading, it offers excellent potential as a triage tool in busy EDs.
Purpose:
Appropriate use criteria (AUC) defines the appropriateness of imaging procedures for specific clinical scenarios to promote evidence-based utilization and improve cost-effective care. The goal of this study was to assess the diagnostic yield and downstream health care resource utilization according to the AUC categorization for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in emergency department (ED) patients presenting with chest pain.
Materials and Methods:
A total of 789 consecutive patients in the ED with chest pain and no known coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent CCTA were classified as appropriate, uncertain, or inappropriate use according to the 2010 AUC. We abstracted index and 30-day data from the electronic medical record to determine diagnostic yield (rate of obstructive CAD and revascularization) and health care resource utilization (downstream stress test and 30-d hospital return rate).
Results:
Rates of appropriate, uncertain, and inappropriate utilization were 48.4%, 48.8%, and 2.8%. Among appropriate, uncertain, and inappropriate classifications, rates of obstructive CAD were 9%, 8%, and 32% (P=0.002); rates of revascularization were 3%, 1%, and 36% (P<0.001); downstream stress test utilization rates were 5% versus 5% versus 14% (P=0.17), and 30-day hospital return rates were 6% versus 6% versus 5% (P>0.99), respectively.
Conclusions:
Appropriate and uncertain uses were associated with low diagnostic yield compared with inappropriate use; however, our findings do not demonstrate differences between appropriate use categories with respect to downstream health care resource utilization. Further studies are needed to define the role of AUC for CCTA in the ED setting.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.