Purpose: Despite many studies attributing HPV infection to oropharyngeal tumorigenesis, its involvement in non-oropharyngeal cancers is ambiguous. We have evaluated the mutation profile of p16 along with protein expression and correlated it with the HPV status in oral cancers. Methods: Somatic mutations in p16 were studied by exome sequencing (n=25) and validated by Sequenom Mass spectrometry (n=50). Expression of p16 was studied by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and correlated with HPV16/18 status evaluated by PCR, and IHC (n=221) in oral cancers. Results: Out of 25 oral cancer patients' samples sequenced by Exome sequencing, p16 mutations were found in 4 samples (16%). All the p16 mutations were identified in patients with cancers in the site of gingivobuccal complex and not tongue subsite. All the 4 patients with p16 mutations had failed treatment, and showed a significantly poor disease-free survival. Insilico analysis of the types of p16 mutations showed mutated, truncated p16 protein having an increased intrinsic disorder, and all the mutations involved truncation post arginine. Validation of the p16 mutations by mass spectrometry showed 8/50 (16%) of patients harbouring pArg80Ter mutation, of which 7/8 (87.5%) had failed treatment. Overexpression of p16 in >70% of the tumour cells was found in 21.4% (26/121) OSCC patients, 6.75% (5/74) OPML patients and p16 expression was significantly correlated (p=0.001; χ 2 = 25.601) to the grade. All the samples were studied for HPV presence by PCR and IHC. We found that none of the p16 positive tumours showing expression in >70% of the tumour cells harbored HPV both by PCR as well as IHC. Conclusion: Our study emphasises the importance of p16 in oral cancers, and shows that oral cancer is not HPV associated and p16 expression is not a surrogate marker for HPV.
Oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC) is an aggressive cancer with high morbidity and mortality rates, despite multimodality management. There are currently no clinically relevant molecular markers that identify patients at higher risk of recurrence and failure. We undertook 2D-DIGE proteomic profiling to study the differentially expressed proteins in OTSCC evaluating their role in prognosis. 2D-DIGE coupled with tandem mass spectrometry was performed on tissues obtained from early staged OTSCC along with its paired apparently adjacent normal tissue samples (
n
=
10
). Top upregulated protein was validated using immunohistochemistry (
n
=
345
), comprising of retrospective early stage OTSCC (
n
=
150
) and prospective series of oral precancers, normal, and oral cancers (
n
=
195
). Saliva samples collected from oral cancer and precancer samples were analyzed by ELISA (
n
=
146
). We found statistically significant differential expression in 151 proteins out of 700 proteins quantified. Top ten differentially regulated proteins were identified using mass spectrometry analysis. We found vimentin, the mesenchymal protein, to be the most upregulated protein in tongue tumor tissues compared to adjacent apparent normal tissues. Vimentin was found to be significantly overexpressed in oral precancers along with cancers compared to normal tissues. The vimentin expression correlated significantly with differentiated states of oral precancers and cancers. Vimentin was also detected at significantly higher levels in saliva collected from oral precancer and cancer patients compared to normal healthy volunteers. Validation of vimentin in an independent series of retrospective early staged OTSCC showed that the vimentin expression is significantly associated with treatment failures and poorer DFS. The vimentin expression is useful as both poor prognostic and early detection marker in oral cancer. Vimentin detection in saliva can be a diagnostic test to detect oral precancers that may have malignant potential, needing closer follow-up, and disease monitoring.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.