The joint consensus panel of the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) and the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) recently addressed present and future challenges in the laboratory diagnostics of atherogenic lipoproteins. Total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC), LDL cholesterol (LDLC), and calculated non-HDLC (=total – HDLC) constitute the primary lipid panel for estimating risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and can be measured in the nonfasting state. LDLC is the primary target of lipid-lowering therapies. For on-treatment follow-up, LDLC shall be measured or calculated by the same method to attenuate errors in treatment decisions due to marked between-method variations. Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]-cholesterol is part of measured or calculated LDLC and should be estimated at least once in all patients at risk of ASCVD, especially in those whose LDLC declines poorly upon statin treatment. Residual risk of ASCVD even under optimal LDL-lowering treatment should be also assessed by non-HDLC or apolipoprotein B (apoB), especially in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertriglyceridemia (2–10 mmol/L). Non-HDLC includes the assessment of remnant lipoprotein cholesterol and shall be reported in all standard lipid panels. Additional apoB measurement can detect elevated LDL particle (LDLP) numbers often unidentified on the basis of LDLC alone. Reference intervals of lipids, lipoproteins, and apolipoproteins are reported for European men and women aged 20–100 years. However, laboratories shall flag abnormal lipid values with reference to therapeutic decision thresholds.

No abstract

Background: Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) is a sensitive marker of cardiac injury, but cTnI assays, like other immunoassays, are susceptible to interferences. We evaluated the presence of interfering substances by measuring the recovery of cTnI added to samples from volunteers and from patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Methods: We added a ternary complex of human cardiac troponin (30 -500 g/L) or cTnI from serum to samples from healthy volunteers and ACS patients. We measured cTnI with a two-site sandwich time-resolved immunofluorometric assay using two antibodies against epitopes in the central stable part of cTnI. We also analyzed 108 heparin-plasma samples from 16 ACS patients with this assay, with an assay based on four antibodies, and with two commercial cTnI assays, Ax-SYM and ACS:180. Results: In samples from both healthy persons and ACS patients, recoveries for our assay were 1-167% (range). Recoveries were increased by addition of an antibody with an epitope in the N-terminal region of cTnI to the solid phase and an antibody with an epitope in the C-terminal region as a second detection antibody. In 2 of 16 patients with ACS, normal cTnI concentrations found when measured with the original assay demonstrated clinically abnormal (up to 10-fold higher) results with the additional N-and C-terminal antibodies in the early phase of infarction. Both commercial cTnI assays also

No abstract

PAPP-A is an additional marker for ACS, but does not seem to be a useful early marker for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The possible clinical utility of PAPP-A calls for extensive studies of chest pain patients using serial sampling combined with short- and long-term outcome studies.

No abstract

Background : Correct information provided by guidelines may reduce laboratory test related errors during the preanalytical, analytical and post-analytical phase and increase the quality of laboratory results. Methods : Twelve clinical practice guidelines were reviewed regarding inclusion of important laboratory investigations. Based on the results and the authors ' experience, two checklists were developed: one comprehensive list including topics that authors of guidelines may consider and one consisting of minimal standards that should be covered for all laboratory tests recommended in clinical practice guidelines. The number of topics addressed by the guidelines was related to involvement of laboratory medicine specialists in the guideline development process. Results : The comprehensive list suggests 33 preanalytical, 37 analytical and 10 post-analytical items. The mean percentage of topics dealt with by the guidelines was 33 % (median 30 % , range 17 % -55 % ) and inclusion of a laboratory medicine specialist in the guideline committee significantly increased the number of topics addressed. Information about patient status, biological and analytical interferences and sample handling were scarce in most guidelines even if the inclusion of a laboratory medicine specialist in the development process seemingly led to increased focus on, e.g., sample type, sample handling and analytical variation. Examples underlining the importance of including laboratory items are given. Conclusions : Inclusion of laboratory medicine specialist in the guideline development process may increase the focus on important laboratory related items even if this information is usually limited. Two checklists are suggested to help guideline developers to cover all important topics related to laboratory testing.

BACKGROUND:We undertook an assessment of current use of evidence-based guidelines for the use of cardiac biomarkers in Europe (EU) and North America (NA).