Osteoporosis is a low bone mass disease most often caused by an increase in bone resorption not compensated by a similar hike in bone formation1. Since gut–derived serotonin (GDS) inhibits bone formation2, we asked whether hampering its biosynthesis could treat osteoporosis through an anabolic mechanism. To that end we synthesized and used LP533401, a small molecule inhibitor of Tph1, the initial enzyme in GDS biosynthesis. Oral administration once daily for up to 6 weeks of this small molecule prevents the development of and fully rescues, in a dose–dependent manner, osteoporosis in ovariectomized rodents because of an isolated increase in bone formation. These results provide a proof of principle that inhibiting GDS biosynthesis could become a novel anabolic treatment for osteoporosis.

No abstract

Background:A cross-talk between a kinase and phosphatase plays a critical role in determining cellular fate. Results: We report that p38␥ phosphorylates its phosphatase PTPH1 in regulation of Ras oncogenesis and stress response. Conclusion:These results indicate that a MAPK can signal through its phosphatase. Significance: These studies reveal a novel mechanism by which a MAPK signals through its phosphatase to determine cellular outcomes.

No abstract

Estrogen receptor a (ERa or ER) is the only target of breast cancer therapy using antiestrogens. However, about 50% of ER-expressing breast cancer is intrinsically refractory to the antihormone therapy and strategies to improve the therapeutic response are urgently needed. Dynamic ER phosphorylation and dephosphorylation play an important role in ER activity and antihormone response. Although more than 10 kinases participate in phosphorylating ER protein, phosphatases involved remain mostly unidentified. Here, we tested the hypothesis that the protein-tyrosine phosphatase H1 (PTPH1) may regulate ER tyrosine phosphorylation and thereby impact breast cancer antihormone sensitivity. Our results showed that PTPH1 dephosphorylates ER at Tyr537 in vitro and in breast cancer cells. Moreover, PTPH1 stimulates ER nuclear accumulation and increases breast cancer sensitivity to tamoxifen (TAM) and/or fulvestrant in cell culture and in a xenograft model. Further analysis revealed that PTPH1 depends on its catalytic activity to stimulate ER nuclear accumulation and to enhance breast cancer antihormone sensitivity. These studies thus identified PTPH1 as a novel ER phosphatase and further demonstrate a therapeutic potential of enhancing breast cancer sensitivity to antiestrogens through dephosphorylating ER by PTPH1. Mol Cancer Ther; 13(1); 230-8. Ó2013 AACR.

No abstract

BackgroundThere was a low adherence to influenza A (H1N1) vaccination program among university students and health care workers during the pandemic influenza in many parts of the world. Vaccination of high risk individuals is one of the recommendations of World Health Organization during the post-pandemic period. It is not documented about the student's knowledge, attitude and willingness to accept H1N1 vaccination during the post-pandemic period. We aimed to analyze the student's knowledge, attitude and willingness to accept H1N1 vaccination during the post-pandemic period in India.MethodsVaccine against H1N1 was made available to the students of Vellore Institute of Technology, India from September 2010. The data are based on a cross-sectional study conducted during October 2010 to January 2011 using a self-administered questionnaire with a representative sample of the student population (N = 802).ResultsOf the 802 respondents, only 102/802 (12.7%) had been vaccinated and 105/802 (13%) planned to do so in the future, while 595/802 (74%) would probably or definitely not get vaccinated in the future. The highest coverage was among the female (65/102, 63.7%) and non-compliance was higher among men in the group (384/595; 64.5%) (p < 0.0001). The representation of students from school of Bio-sciences and Bio-technology among vaccinees is significantly higher than that of other schools. Majority of the study population from the three groups perceived vaccine against H1N1 as the effective preventive measure when compared to other preventive measures. 250/595 (42%) of the responders argued of not being in the risk group. The risk perception was significantly higher among female (p < 0.0001). With in the study group, 453/802 (56.4%) said that they got the information, mostly from media.ConclusionsOur study shows that the vaccination coverage among university students remains very low in the post-pandemic period and doubts about the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine are key elements in their rejection. Our results indicate a need to provide accessible information about the vaccine safety by scientific authorities and fill gaps and confusions in this regard.

No abstract