Objective Animal studies suggested that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) facilitate the inoculation of potentially leading to a higher risk of infection and/or disease severity. We aimed to systematically evaluate the risk of COVID-19 infection and the risk of severe COVID-19 disease associated with previous exposure to (ACEi) and/or ARB). Methods MEDLINE, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, Web of Science Core Collection were searched in June 2020 for controlled studies. Eligible studies were included and random-effects meta-analyses were performed. The estimates were expressed as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Heterogeneity was assessed with I 2 test. The confidence in the pooled evidence was appraised using the GRADE framework. Results Twenty-seven studies were included in the review. ACEi/ARB exposure did not increase the risk of having a positive test for COVID-19 infection (OR 0.99, 95%CI 0.89–1.11; I 2 = 36%; 5 studies, GRADE confidence moderate). The exposure to ACEi/ARB did not increase the risk of all-cause mortality among patients with COVID-19 (OR 0.91, 95%CI 0.74–1.11; I 2 = 20%; 17 studies; GRADE confidence low) nor severe/critical COVID-19 disease (OR 0.90, 95%CI 0.74–1.11; I 2 = 55%; 17 studies; GRADE confidence very low). Exploratory analyses in studies enrolling hypertensive patients showed a association of ACEi/ARB with a significant decrease of mortality risk. Conclusions ACEi/ARB exposure does not seem to increase the risk of having the SARS-CoV-2 infection or developing severe stages of the disease including mortality. The potential benefits observed in mortality of hypertensive patients reassure safety, but robust studies are required to increase the confidence in the results.

No abstract

Background Despite the reduction in mortality and hospitalization rates, resynchronization therapy still has 30-40% of non-responders. Several studies are ongoing to evaluate if novel programming techniques such as multipoint pacing (MPP) increase the conversion rate of non-responder to responder to CRT. However, there is still lack of information about conversion to super-responders and the impact in quality of life of MPP. Purpose To evaluate the impact of MPP in conversion to super-responders and its impact in the quality of life of patients. Methods Randomized clinical trial of non-AF patients with indication for CRT and who implanted the Quartet™ quadripolar left ventricle (LV) lead. After implant, CRTs were programmed on biventricular pacing according to the latest activated area for 6 months. After a 6-month follow-up, patients were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to MPP ON or MPP OFF. MPP was programmed with the two widest spaced LV electrodes and with a LV1-LV2 to LV2-RV delay of 5ms. Patients were followed-up for 12 months with a 6-month evaluation of NTproBNP, echocardiographic remodeling criteria (LV end systolic volume (ESV) and LV ejection fraction), and quality of life (QoL) evaluated by EQ-5D, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) questionnaire and 6-minute walk test (6MWT). Results  76 patients were included in this trial, 62 with a completed 12-month follow-up (average age 67.2 ± 10.2 years old, 32.3% female gender, dilated cardiomyopathy in 77.4%). Among these patients, 24 were randomized to MPP ON, 28 to MPP OFF. Six patients died and 4 were lost to follow-up. Baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were similar between groups (p = NS). At 6 months, the overall response rate (reduction in ESV≥15%) was 75%. At twelve months, patients randomized to MPP ON had a super-response rate (reduction in ESV≥30%) higher than patients with MPP OFF (75% vs 39.3%, p = 0.01). Between 6-12 months, patients assigned to MPP ON had a higher reduction in ESV (93.4 ± 52.3mL to 82.1 ± 40.5mL, p = 0.04) and an improvement in LVEF (38.3 ± 9.8% to 45.1 ± 11.1%, p < 0.01) compared to patients with MPP OFF (92.2 ± 47.3mL to 95.4 ± 47.5mL, p = NS; 37.1 ± 12.0% to 40.2 ± 9.2%, p = NS). Additionally, QoL of patients with MPP ON improved during follow up (EQ-5D 78.3% to 86.3%, p < 0.01; MLWHF 12.1 to 6.6, p = 0.03, 6MWT 316m to 239m, p = NS; NTproBNP 1608 ± 2450pg/mL to 775 ± 914pg/mL, p = NS) and was unchanged in MPP OFF patients (76.6% to 74.2%; MLWHF 12.7 to 12.7; 6MWT 338m to 299m, NTproBNP 1112 ± 1442pg/mL to 1383 ± 2118pg/mL, for all p = NS). Conclusion In our population, patients with CRT programmed with MPP ON, when compared to MPP OFF, had an improvement in the super-response rate and in quality of life. These results may be consequence from a more favorable reverse remodeling due to MPP, with a higher reduction in the LV end systolic volume. Abstract Figure.

RESUMOEste estudo teve o objetivo de estimar o custo hospitalar de internações por AVC no Pronto-Socorro do Hospital São Paulo; para isso, foram analisados 20 prontuários. O custo diagnóstico médio diário foi de US$ 40.68 para pacientes sem complicações e de US$ 22.25 para pacientes com complicações. O custo terapêutico médio diário foi de US$ 12.67 para pacientes sem complicações e de US$ 105.46 para pacientes com complicações. As principais complicações apresentadas foram infecção pulmonar (40%), úlcera de decúbito (30%), hipertensão intracraniana (25%). O custo total médio diário foi diretamente proporcional às complicações. Unitermos: Acidente vascular cerebral, custo, economia.

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background During the COVID-19 pandemic many countries have imposed lockdown restrictions to movement. Since the 18th of March in Portugal, thousands of people have been confined to their homes. While hospital admissions for COVID-19 patients increased exponentially, admissions for non-COVID-19 patients decreased dramatically. However, it remains unclear whether lockdown-related immobility can contribute to the increased incidence of pulmonary embolism. Purpose To compare the incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) during the lockdown period (Abril 1 to May 31, 2020) compared to the reference period in 2019. Methods Retrospective study of consecutive outpatients who presented to the emergency department and underwent computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) due to suspicion of PE. Results Compared to the same period of 2019, the lockdown period was associated with a significant increase in PE diagnosis (29 versus 18 patients). PE patients during lockdown were older (median age 71 years; interquartile range [IQR][60-85] versus 59 years [44-76]; p = 0.046) and have lower prevalence of active cancer (14% versus 33% in the reference period). Women represent 55% (n = 16) of patients in lockdown group (versus 50% in 2019 group). Clinical probability (GENEVA score) was similar in both groups (median score 2.72 in lockdown group and 2.50 in reference group, p = 0.452). None of the patients with PE was diagnosed with COVID-19. Conclusion We have observed a marked increase (62%) in PE diagnosis during lockdown period compared to the reference period, which can be explained by the reduction in physical activity due to teleworking and closure of gyms and sports activities. These data reinforce the importance of promoting physical activity programs at home. The role of pharmacological or mechanical thromboprophylaxis in this scenario remains unclear.

Background Left ventricular (LV) lead placement is the most challenging aspect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implantation, with a failure rate of up to 10% due to complex coronary anatomies. We describe a modified snare technique for LV lead placement and evaluate its safety and efficacy in cases when standard methods fail. Methods and Results A prospective study was conducted of patients indicated for a CRT implant. When LV lead delivery to the target vessel failed using standard techniques, a modified snare technique was employed. Patients were evaluated every 6 months. From 2015 to 2019, 566 CRTs were implanted (26.1% female, 72 ± 10.2 years old, follow‐up duration 18.9 ± 15.8 months). The standard LV implant technique failed in 94 cases (16.6%), of which the modified snare technique was successful in 92 (97.9%). There were no differences between the modified snare and standard techniques in the rates of 30‐day postimplant CRT all‐cause mortality (3.2% vs. 1.7%, p = .33), 4‐year all‐cause mortality (15.9% vs. 15.5%, p = .49), or major acute complications (7.4% vs. 3.8%, p = .12). However, the 4‐year procedural reintervention rate was lower with the modified snare technique (3.2% vs. 10.2%, p < .05), specifically LV implant failure or dislodgement rates (0% vs. 5.3%, p < .05), improving the response rate (71.8% vs. 55.1%, p < .05). Conclusions For challenging coronary sinus anatomies that preclude LV lead placement by standard methods, this modified snare alternative was safe and effective, with comparable mortality and complications, but significantly lower procedural reintervention and higher response rates.

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction Discharge after overnight hospital stay is standard procedure in patients submitted to elective atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Taking into consideration the low rate of cryoablation procedure complications could the same day discharge be an option? Purpose To access the safety of same day discharge of patients submitted to AF cryoablation. Methods Single-center retrospective study of consecutive pts admitted to elective AF cryoablation in a tertiary center between February 2017 and November 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: same day discharge and next day discharge. Only patients submitted to ablation until 4 p.m. were included. Complication rates were obtained up to six months after the procedure. Complications were defined as death, pericardial tamponade, hematoma requiring evaluation and/or intervention, major bleeding requiring transfusion, hospital admission related to the procedure. Results One hundred fifty-four pts were included, with a mean age of 61 ± 10.9 years, 66.2% were males, 18.2% with diabetes, 65.6% with dyslipidemia, 77.9% with hypertension, 10.4% with chronic kidney disease KDIGO stage 3 or more. Median follow-up of 436 (IQ 178 – 729) days. Most of the pts had paroxysmal (73.4%) and persistent short duration AF (23.4%). Sixty-two pts (40.3%) were early discharged and there were no differences between the two groups regarding epidemiological and clinical characteristics (p = NS). A very low rate of complications in both groups was observed, occurring in 6.5% of pts with early discharge and in 8.7% of pts in overnight stay, without statistical significance between the two groups (p = 0.61). The most frequent complications were local hematoma (5 pts, 2 in early discharged group), pericardial effusion (3 pts, all in overnight stay), femoral pseudo-aneurism (2 pts, 1 in each group) and arteriovenous fistula (1 pt in overnight stay group). The type of complications did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.51). Two pts died during the follow up, unrelated with the procedure. In addition, no difference in success rate and arrhythmic recurrence was observed between the two groups. (p = NS) Conclusion Our study suggests that is safe to early discharge pts submitted to AF ablation, reducing the hospital stay length in selected pts. Larger studies are needed to confirm this data before routine implementation of this strategy.

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction Catheter ablation (CA) prevents ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrences in patients (pts) with structural heart disease (SHD), and might have a favorable outcome, but is associated with severe short-term complications. Identification of pts at high risk of periprocedural acute haemodynamic decompensation has important implications at procedural planning. The PAINESD risk score is a promising tool to predict VT ablation procedure-related mortality. Aim To evaluate the accuracy of the PAINESD risk score to predict short-term mortality after structural VT ablation and to compare it with other conventional clinical predictors. Methods Prospective, observational, single-centre study of consecutive pts with SHD (ischemic or nonischemic), referred for VT-CA. High-density substrate maps were collected, through endocardial, epicardial or combined endo-epicardial approaches according to clinical data and operator preference. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality or hemodynamic decompensation. Univariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify relevant clinical predictors and to compare them with the PAINESD risk score. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate predictors of 30-day mortality. Results A total of 102 pts with SHD referred for VT ablation were evaluated(mean age: 67±11 years, 94% male, 78.4% in NYHA class I-II; mean LVEF was 34±11%). The baseline PAINESD risk score was 12.39±5.8, 19.6% at low risk, 36.3% at intermediate risk and 27.5% at high risk of adverse events. Overall 30-day mortality was 4.9%. The PAINESD did not predict 30-days mortality or hemodynamic decompensation (p= 0.93). Indeed, a non- significant trend to higher short and long-term mortality was noticed in high-risk score pts – Figure 1. On univariate analysis age&gt;65 years (p=0.019), LVEF &lt;35% (p=0.049), body mass index&lt;28kg/m2 (p=0.019), CKD (p=0.001) and previous VT ablation (p=0.022) were prognostic predictors. On multivariate analysis, only LVEF&lt;35% (HR2.225; CI95% 1.004-4-774,p=0.038) and CKD (HR 3.35; CI95%: 1.31-8.51, p=0.011) were independent predictors of short-term prognosis. Conclusions In our population, LVEF&lt;35% and CKD were the strongest predictors of short-term mortality. PAINESD risk score was not accurate in predicting adverse events. New score systems must be derived for prognostic stratification in this population, incorporating the reduction on the actual short-term event rates after VT ablation.