No abstract

Exercises in the brace allow adjunctive forces to be applied on soft tissues and through them, presumably on the spine. Different exercises can be chosen to obtain different actions. Physical exercises and sporting activities are useful in mechanical terms, although other important actions should not be overlooked.

Interunit variability among bone densitometers is due to different factors, including different calibration procedures and algorithms and variability in photon source energies and/or intensities. Other factors, such as the choice of scan parameters or the analysis procedures, can also introduce variability. The new generation of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has partially improved this situation. The aim of this study was to investigate the operator-dependent analysis procedures that can affect scan results and to evaluate the phantom and in vivo interunit variation of some DXA instruments. Four DXA instruments (QDR 1000 and 1000/W, Hologic, Inc.) were used. Potential sources of variability in the analysis procedures of anteroposterior lumbar spine and hip scans were considered: in most cases these procedures significantly influenced scan results. On lumbar spine, an enlargement of the scan window of less than 3 cm was responsible for an average increase in bone mineral density (BMD) of about 3%. On the hip, lowering the scan window by about 1 cm accounted for an increase in the whole-segment BMD of about 4%. After standardization of analysis procedures, interunit and intraunit coefficients of variation and percentage differences among instruments were less than 1% for all the parameters considered (area and bone mineral content and density) with both an anatomic and a geometric phantom, and in nine subjects scanned by two different devices the percentage difference in BMD was greater than 2%. This study shows that present interunit variability allows comparisons among laboratories, but only if highly standardized analysis procedures are used.

No abstract