The clinical relevance of antiphospholipid antibodies (APLA) in patients without systemic lupus erythematosus who have venous thromboembolism (VTE) in unknown. Limited evidence suggests that there is an association between the presence of APLA and both initial and recurrent episodes of VTE and that patients with APLA and VTE are resistant to warfarin therapy. Unselected patients with a first episode of clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism were evaluated with objective tests for VTE and with laboratory tests for APLA; the latter included tests for the lupus anticoagulant (LA) and anticardiolipin antibodies (ACLA). Patients with VTE were treated with anticoagulant therapy and observed during and after discontinuation of anticoagulants for symptomatic recurrence of VTE. There was a strong association between LA and VTE (odds ratio, 9.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1 to 46.2) and 9 to 65 (14%; 95% CI, 7% to 25%) patients with VTE had LA. There was no association between the presence of ACLA and VTE (odds ratio, 0.7; 95%CI, 0.3 to 1.7) because of the high frequency of positive ACLA assays in patients without VTE. None of the 16 patients with VTE and APLA developed recurrent VTE while receiving warfarin therapy. There was no difference in rates of recurrent VTE in patients with or without APLA after anticoagulant therapy was discontinued. The strong association between LA and VTE suggests that testing for LA in patients with VTE is useful. The measurement of ACLA in patients with VTE has no clinical usefulness because the results are abnormal in a high proportion of patients without VTE. Although the presence of APLA in patients with VTE was not associated with resistance to a conventional intensity of warfarin or an increased risk of recurrent VTE after discontinuation of warfarin, a larger study should address these issues in a subgroup of patients with VTE and LA.
SummaryStudy Objective: To determine the clinical utility of a novel whole blood assay for D-dimer (SimpliRED™) in patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism (PE).Design: Prospective cohort.Patients: Eighty-six consecutive patients with clinically suspected PE.Intervention: All patients had the SimpliRED D-dimer assay performed and underwent ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) lung scanning and bilateral impedance plethysmography (IPG); pulmonary angiography was performed in two patients. Patients were classified as: 1) PE-positive; positive pulmonary angiography or high probability V/Q scan or non-high probability V/Q scan and either abnormal IPG (either at presentation or upon serial testing and confirmed by contrast venography) or symptomatic thromboembolic event within three months of presentation or 2) PE-negative; normal V/Q scan or normal pulmonary angiography or non-high probability V/Q scan and normal serial IPG and absence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism within three months of follow up. Sixteen (19%) patients were classified as PE-positive and 70 (81%) patients were classified as PE-negative.Measurements and Result: The sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values of the D-dimer assay were calculated for all patients and for the subgroup of patients without comorbid conditions that independently can cause elevated D-dimer levels. The D-dimer showed a sensitivity of 94%, a negative predictive value of 98%, a specificity of 66%, and a positive predictive value of 38%. In the subgroup of patients without comorbid conditions, the specificity increased to 98% and the positive predictive value to 83%, but because only six patients had an abnormal D-dimer level, the 95% confidence interval on the observed positive predictive value is wide (36-100%).Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the SimpliRED D-dimer assay, which can be performed and interpreted at the bedside within five minutes, has potential clinical utility as an exclusionary test in patients with clinically suspected PE. The assay should be evaluated in large clinical management studies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.