The fundamental parameters of rock strength, rock mass stiffness, and interface roughness that control the development of side shear in a rock socketed pile are discussed on the basis of results from laboratory model socket tests, constant stiffness direct shear tests, and instrumented prototype piles. Based on the understanding of these fundamental parameters and on a survey of socket field test results, an empirical design method is proposed for side shear only sockets. This design method considers both the maximum load capacity and settlement criteria for single sockets.

This paper gives elastic solutions for the following: (i) settlement of a shear socket; (ii) settlement reduction due to recessment of a shear socket in a shaft; (iii) settlement reduction of flexible or rigid footings due to recessment in a shaft; (iv) load distribution in a rock socket; and (v) settlement of a rock socket.This paper illustrates the use of these solutions in the design of socketed piles and in the back-analysis of field tests on rock sockets.

Rock quality designation (RQD) was introduced by Don Deere in the mid-1960s as a means of using diamond core to classify rock for engineering purposes. Subsequently, it was incorporated into the rock mass rating (RMR) and Q-system classification methods that, worldwide, now play substantial roles in rock mechanics design, whether for tunnels, foundations, rock slopes or rock excavation. It is shown that a key facet of the definition of RQD is ignored in many parts of the world, and it is noted that there are several inherent limitations to the use of RQD. Based on mapping of rock formations by 17 independent professionals at different locations in Australia and South Africa, it is shown that differences in assessed RQD values result in significant errors in computed RMR and Q ratings, and also in geological strength index (GSI) and mining rock mass rating (MRMR). The introduction of a look-up chart for assessing GSI has effectively removed the need to measure, or estimate, RQD. It has been found that GSI values derived from the look-up chart are as valid as those derived by calculation from the original component parameters, and are satisfactorily consistent between professionals from diverse backgrounds. The look-up charts provide a quick and appropriate means of assessing GSI from exposures. GSI is, in turn, a useful rock mass strength index; one new application is presented for assessing potential erosion of unlined spillways in rock. Incorporation of RQD within the RMR and Q classification systems was a matter of historical development, and its incorporation into rock mass classifications is no longer necessary.

No abstract

No abstract