1979
DOI: 10.1139/t79-054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elastic solutions for the design and analysis of rock-socketed piles

Abstract: This paper gives elastic solutions for the following: (i) settlement of a shear socket; (ii) settlement reduction due to recessment of a shear socket in a shaft; (iii) settlement reduction of flexible or rigid footings due to recessment in a shaft; (iv) load distribution in a rock socket; and (v) settlement of a rock socket.This paper illustrates the use of these solutions in the design of socketed piles and in the back-analysis of field tests on rock sockets.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For pile sockets in rock, the finite element method provides more reliable solutions, e.g. Pells & Turner (1979). The analysis in this section can be used for both the load-transfer analysis (commonly termed the t-z analysis), in which the soil resistance is modelled by a discrete spring at each element, and the continuum analysis, in which the soil is modelled as an elastic continuum.…”
Section: (24mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For pile sockets in rock, the finite element method provides more reliable solutions, e.g. Pells & Turner (1979). The analysis in this section can be used for both the load-transfer analysis (commonly termed the t-z analysis), in which the soil resistance is modelled by a discrete spring at each element, and the continuum analysis, in which the soil is modelled as an elastic continuum.…”
Section: (24mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This increased to 6.8% after 200 days. For both of these model piers, the load transferred to the pier base is significantly lower than the end-bearing values (20%) predicted using elastic solutions (Pells and Turner 1979). The reasons for the discrepancy are uncertain.…”
Section: Testing Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Consequently, a number of studies have been carried out to examine the influence of various factors on the design, construction, and performance of socketed pier foundations. Analytical studies using finite element techniques have been performed by Coates and Yu (1970), Ellison et al (1971), Osterberg and Gill (1973), Pells and Turner (1979), and Rowe and Armitage (1987a). Instrumented full-scale tests have been carried out by Glos and Briggs (1983), Horvath (1982), Jackson et al (1973), Koutsoftas (1981), and Williams (1980).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15] This condition was the determining factor for the rock socket length -the expected settlements under the full loads were then around 10 mm and about 5 mm under the launching condition. Elastic shortening of the piles would add about 3 mm to these figures.…”
Section: Single Pilesmentioning
confidence: 99%